Porn Stars

Two Questions on Joslyn Jamesred_smile
chunks14 86 Reviews 6446 reads
posted

1)  How come she has been around for a while and has no reviews?

2)  She is sometimes advertised as the Tiger Tamer because she was one of Mr. Woods mistresses.  Now that Mr. Woods has been exposed as a man with less morals than most, does that make you want to see her more or less?

I do but I missed that one.  Also, my 2nd question is unrelated and no one answered the 1st question very well.

mrfrench1754 reads

Posted By: chunks14
1)  How come she has been around for a while and has no reviews?
  (a) Not everyone can afford to see porn stars

  (b) Many who do, are not on this site

 (c) Many who do, who are on this site, don't write reviews (for whatever reason).  Sometimes guys won't write a review because they did something with that lady that she normally doesn't do (like BDSM or anal) and sometimes because they did something that is frowned upon (like bareback).

I've seen a number of porn stars that I haven't written reviews for and the reasons have varied: they were UTR, she asked me not to, or I didn't have a good time with them because we had no chemistry and I didn't want to lower her score just because that chemistry didn't exist.  There are other reasons too but those are the most common.  
Posted By: chunks14

2)  She is sometimes advertised as the Tiger Tamer because she was one of Mr. Woods mistresses.  Now that Mr. Woods has been exposed as a man with less morals than most, does that make you want to see her more or less?
For me, no change since I have no interest in her at all. :-)

Excellent explanation, Mr. French.  In matters of taste there is no dispute.  If people cannot agree on what is the best car, the best kind of food, or the best looking clothes, then they certainly cannot agree on who is the best porn star/provider.  And considering the "borderline legality" of some of the things that are discussed on this board, it would be no surprise if 90%+ of the "reviewable" encounters never get reviewed.

Posted By: mrfrench
Posted By: chunks14
1)  How come she has been around for a while and has no reviews?
  (a) Not everyone can afford to see porn stars

  (b) Many who do, are not on this site

 (c) Many who do, who are on this site, don't write reviews (for whatever reason).  Sometimes guys won't write a review because they did something with that lady that she normally doesn't do (like BDSM or anal) and sometimes because they did something that is frowned upon (like bareback).

I've seen a number of porn stars that I haven't written reviews for and the reasons have varied: they were UTR, she asked me not to, or I didn't have a good time with them because we had no chemistry and I didn't want to lower her score just because that chemistry didn't exist.  There are other reasons too but those are the most common.  
Posted By: chunks14

2)  She is sometimes advertised as the Tiger Tamer because she was one of Mr. Woods mistresses.  Now that Mr. Woods has been exposed as a man with less morals than most, does that make you want to see her more or less?
For me, no change since I have no interest in her at all. :-)

"they did something that is frowned upon (like bareback)".

Is this one of those posts (again) where bareback is something that is meant for adult indsutry pros, foolishness...Like they're members of some elite society like a Supreme Court justice or President of the Harvard Law Review...

Frowned upon huh..I think we need to be little honest here - this lifestyle, and for that matter, the adult film industry is "frowned upon" by many in society...President Obama did not address hobbyist concerns or adult film industry matters in the SOTU Tues night...And, between water breaks, neither did senator rubio in the GOP response...I don't think people in this lifestyle and the porn industry are in a position to be judgemental when we are for the most part, "frowned upon" by much of society...

Also, i guess i'll never understand why some think because they wear a condom that somehow they are now eligible for the Brian Piccolo  Award or the Walter Payton Humanitarian  Award...Your're STILL a peraon who pays for companionship, and in many cases, the person is married...People in the lifestlye are in ZERO position to cast judgment and throw stones (though inexplicably many do)...This always reminds me of the classic line in "Godfather II" where the corrupt senator is lecturing Micahel and he responds "We're both part of the same hypocrisy, senator"....

I like you Mr French, but your post was little too self-righteous...

footnote - Yes there is a Brain Piccolo Award, named in honor of the former Chicago Bears RB who died of cancer in his mid 20's....

mrfrench1480 reads

What I meant by that comment is that on many boards, people who engage in bareback sex are ostracized, ridiculed, berated, etc.  There are many people who will not see an escort who offers bareback sex and there are many escorts who won't see guys who ask for bareback sex.  I don't think I can name any of those other boards because they are competitors to TER and so this post will be removed but anyone who has been in this hobby for any length of time, should know which boards I'm speaking about.  But, even here on this site, if you go into some of the other discussion forums, you'll see posts from hobbyists who ridicule and/or berate anyone who asks about BBFS.

For the record, I have nothing against bareback sex or those who enjoy it.  I won't watch a porn movie where condoms are used unless it's only in one scene of several.  And I personally wish that TER would allow people to mention in reviews if bareback sex was offered or available.  I think it should be one of the fields in the profile along with kissing and touching pussy, etc.  I've always believed that more information is better than less and if the information was there it would give every hobbyist more information about the escort and what she offers and would allow the hobbyist to make a more informed decision about seeing that escort.  Some people will stay away from those escorts, others will be more inclined to make a date with her.  It's unlikely to affect her business.

But, the Powers That Be here at TER won't allow it.  Discussions about bareback sex on this site have only recently been allowed at all - for a long time mentioning BBFS was cause to have the post removed.  I believe you still cannot name escorts who offer it but can only talk about it in general terms like we're doing here.

I know for a fact, based on private conversations I've had with people that there is a lot more bareback sex going on than anyone thinks.  I also know that there are hobbyists who have bareback sex with escorts but write their reviews in such a way that you can't tell that they had bareback sex with the escort.  I also know that there are hobbyists who don't write reviews because they do engage in bareback sex with the escort and they don't want to write "false" reviews.  

You are one of the few hobbyists who make it well known that you do it.  You've never named any escort that you've done it with as far as I know.  I'm not saying that's a bad thing, or a good thing, just a fact.  

There are a lot of different opinions on the subject but, for good or bad, bareback sex, BBFS whatever you want to call it, is frowned upon here by the staff, and by many hobbyists on this site and others.

So, I stand by the statement I made that bareback with escorts is something that is generally frowned upon (to put it mildly).

This is a hugely important issue and should be discussed.  I did not take your original comment as being disingenuous because you stated a simple fact accurately.  BBFS is frowned upon by most people.  I do understand The Moose's sensitivity here and am sure you do, too.
He has his own way of playing this game and it's well known to anyone who's read this board over the years.  While I don't play it his way I respect the way he does it.  He's completely open and clear about his standards and takes precautions that are as stringent as one can have.
The people who are the problem are the ones who don't take similar precautions and operate on the margins, endangering themselves and others.
What I like even less are people who are judgmental about the preferences of others.  One sees it all over the boards and it's ludicrous.  No doubt, people being people, it will continue.

We can agree to disagree...As far as the other discussion forums, i don't even read or post on any other board anymore...I use to post alot on the politics board, but i don't even go on there anymore....If i want to read/discuss politics, i will go to the New York Times...

And i'll stand by what ive said over the years, the BB topic brings out alot of sour grapes, jealousy, hyperbolic non-sense, and outright lies...And of course those that will proclaim their hatred of BB, yet if THEY do it then its ok...Sort of like those politicans who preach the family values rhetoric, then get caught with their pants down....(But these days, unless a politican gets caught with a live boy or a dead girl, then it probably won't ruin him)

And there are many who "frown upon" hobbyists who are married who see providers...I told my dentist my lifestyle and he's actually quite cool with it because I'm single....But he absolutely HATES guys who cheat on their wives, so its very safe to say he frowns upon married hobbyists seeing providers (i guess he can judge since he's been married for 28 yrs)...What about frowning upon people who engage in anal?...I find anal sex repulsive, but i don't sit there all smug and frown upon those who do anal, that's their business...

Again, being judged by another hobbyist would be like some addicted gambler saying its ok that he's losing money because he's playing cool, upscale games like black-jack and baccarat, but people who lose money on slot machines or horseracing are some sort of sub-human losers...

mrfrench1121 reads

Hm,  all I said was that there were people who frown upon it.  It seems like your problem is with people who do frown upon it rather than with me for saying that there are people who frown upon it.

I've tried to keep my own personal feelings of the subject out of the discussion except to say that I think that it should be openly discussed and that providers and hobbyists who engage in it should be free to say so here on this board, in the reviews, and elsewhere.  That would allow people to make up their own minds on who to see or not to see based on true information rather than rumors and innuendo.

I think that's the last I'm going to say on the subject.

I refer to your condescending reference to Tiger Woods as "a man with less morals than most."  Coming from a guy with more than 40 reviews on a fuck board, this pot-kettle-black moment is rather hilarious.  Thanks!

Posted By: chunks14
1)  How come she has been around for a while and has no reviews?

2)  She is sometimes advertised as the Tiger Tamer because she was one of Mr. Woods mistresses.  Now that Mr. Woods has been exposed as a man with less morals than most, does that make you want to see her more or less?

Never claimed that I was'nt for starters.  Also, I'm single and not a married man.  I operate a restaurant and have very little time for a social life.  Mr. Woods had it all!  The best golfer in the world, countless endorsements, a gorgeous Swedish model for a wife, and two beautiful children.  If I had all of that, I would'nt even consider seeing anyone except for my wife.  Mr. Wood's had 11 confirmed mistreses, at least 8 more reported and God knows how many other escorts that he was sleeping with.  I see 6- 8 in an entire year for companionship.  I'm not a sex addict like Mr. Woods that gave up on his family!!!

Quad72976 reads

I guess everyone needs someone else to look down on to feel better about themselves.

And the truth is that the fact that you see escorts at all would disqualify you from attaining a number of public positions, as your actions would be seen as a moral failure.

As for not being a sex addict, what qualifies for the label is debatable, but if you can't stop seeing escorts you're probably one.

-- Modified on 2/17/2013 10:53:08 AM

I'm not looking down on anyone.  I'm just stating the facts.  As far as your stance on wether I or similar people could hold important public positions, you have only proved what a poorly informed person you are.  Several Presidents in U.S. History have been linked to escorts, misstreses, interns, etc. and thrived.  The entire Kennedy family was infamous for their acts but their political careers continued to flourish, and that's only one example.  Finally, I could stop seeing escorts when ever I wanted to but I won't because of my hectic schedule which does'nt allow me to have any regular relationships.  By the way, I help on average 12,000 people from the general public have a great time at my work every week and my hobby has never interfered with it.

RichardHeadIII1021 reads

LMFAO!!!!

You just made me blow chunks w/ your faux moral outrage & pontificating!!!

You should post on the P&R board  w/all that  pent up faux moral outrage, it will give you a venue & soapbox.

What an ass wipe!

LMFAO......your RH III's bitch!!!

Emptypockets1010 reads

Does being single make you a better person for not "cheating" on your wife or GF?

After many years of marriage, you may not be able to resist the urge to fuck somebody else or to fuck at all in certain situations!  

Sure people have come down hard on Tiger b/c when the truth came out it was so contrary to the public image he put out.  I agree a bit that he fucked it all up.  A smoking hot wife, family, image, but his little head was in control of the big head.

I dare anyone to say that they have never let their big head overrule the little one.  I don't even want to think how much money I've blown fucking escorts.  I bet my 401K IRAs would be a lot bigger than it is now.  However, I also would have never had the experiences I've had with some beautiful women!  Some down & dirty great fuck sessions.

What does it matter if he had 2 or 200 mistresses/escorts.  Nor, does fucking escorts 4-6 times a year make you a better or lesser man than someone who fucks an escort everyday!

BTW: that's not me, but I actually met a guy at a Meet & Greet who said he did see a provider just about every single day.  Unreal!  Must have some extremely deep pockets!

she is in NYC tomorrow..just book her and find out..i am sure she will tame your little tiger..

Posted By: chunks14
1)  How come she has been around for a while and has no reviews?

2)  She is sometimes advertised as the Tiger Tamer because she was one of Mr. Woods mistresses.  Now that Mr. Woods has been exposed as a man with less morals than most, does that make you want to see her more or less?

Register Now!