Staff has told me on numerous occassions that once you post a thread under one name you can't post on that thread again under a different alias. If that's the case, then staff needs to monitor Singleton and his other identities. Cuz if he can do it, then I want to do it! Damn, as if things aren't confusing enough already...

(see AVN top 50 Post below as an example...)

-- Modified on 8/11/2003 12:01:47 PM

-- Modified on 8/11/2003 12:02:46 PM

the difference between me doing it and others doing it (surreptitiously) is that i make sure people KNOW it's me (perhaps not so much yet on this board) ... moderators on National and other boards (like GND, thirsty, etc) already know this ... in fact Girl Next Door (GND) has already posted the operative policy which is: it's ok if its done for humourous purposes (by interpretive extension: when it's obvious who it is)


but if folks here prefer a more straight-up (and humourless) approach, i'd be happy to abide by the accepted standards & practices of PSE boards (especially like "other" ones!) ... far be it for me to break any "rules"  (it would be the end of civilization as we know it!


--------------------------------------------------------------

FOR THE RECORD, i am:

- singleton (VIP member)

and

- "Cynicalman 2.0" (bastard child "upgrade" of "Cynicalman")

- "The Collector" (a twisted but faithful caricature of The Simpson's "comic book guy" but only re: Traci Lords!)

- "A Participator" (arch-nemesis of the esteemed aliased-but-VIP member "A Spectator"

.
.
.

- and the *entire* cast of THE SIMPSONS!  (on National only) ... yes don't bother, i've taken ALL their aliases!  LOL



HAPPY GEESE HUNTING!  

Singleton, I don't hear anyone laughing.
HAPPY HUNTING

[] number of reviews in the TER database: 100,000+

[] average cost-per to a reviewer: ~$300 (minimum)

[] "net worth" of the TER database = ~$30,000,000  


yes ... $30 Million! ... it's not for nothing the database is copyrighted!


[] membership cost to you:  $20/month !


so perhaps the "choose-not-to-reviewers" should consider themselves lucky in the 1st place that TER even gives them access to the database details that the blood-sweat-n-working-tears of others has created ... beyond this inequity, there's an even more egregious one: non-reviwers actually SAVE MONEY from using this database, in essence they PROFIT from reviewers' costly mistakes/triumphs ... so, are they our "equals" ? ... you tell me!


(now what was that word i used to describe people who profit from other folks' bizness/efforts? ... what's the word? ... shit! ... it escapes me now ... starts with a P, i think!  


ANY QUESTIONS?    .... no? .... then class is "dismissed"!


---


don't know about you or others ... but I'M laughing now!  

LOL

This board is for entertainment purposes only and if you are using it to glean information about PSE's, then you are as blind as you were befor you found this board, and if TER were to disapear tomorrow, it wouldn't slow me down one bit and I can assure I have seen more PSEs than you have even dreamed about.
HAPPY HUNTING

OF COURSE i'd be (almost) as "blind" as before i joined TER! LOL

heck, before joining TER (and the "other" board) i didn't even know pornstars escorted in such a "criminally organized" and "syndicated" way (with agencies and whatnot) ... i thought the only way you could bang them was if you were one of those sleazy industry "buzzard-boys" that circle them "pecking" for little morsels of nookie here-n-there

i guess i'll tell folks (though i don't know why i should bother) ... i've fucked clueless newbie "starlets" who don't deserve any mention here and been on the set of photo shoots for LFP as well as having met the perv-meister himself Rob Black and one of his proteges (heck, i was once even a "towel boy" of sorts on a 4G dildos-up-the-ying-yang vid shoot) ... except i'd NEVER call myself an "insider" ... i don't make up stuff, i don't impersonate and i very much dislike pretense ... there's ONE person here that i know and respect in that regard and that's sbjohnwe, why? cuz he has reviews and he doesn't talk shit!

believe me, as far as i'm concerned the internet has earned its keep! LOL -- and i've been using it since (almost) its very inception, before it was polluted by the "unwashed masses" -- btw, that's NOT a dig at you or anyone else here, seriously, just something i like saying a lot: "unwashed masses" LOL

i have NO DOUBT that folks like you [cough] have porked more PSEs than me -- i mean my god, haven't i been completely upfront about it from the get-go?  LOL ... i'm like ALEX THE VIRGIN IN PSE WONDERLAND! (where's that silly pussy-rabbit going?) LOL -- except i did get de-flowered proper last week and i did it entirely on my own (although i'm not sure that's something worth bragging about)

but apparently some folks here mistakenly think that somehow that makes me clueless to providers, agencies, shills and the general hobby itself ... 15+ years dude!


[drops the mike, exits stage left]  peace out!  

Well thank you, at least we agree on one thing, but let me ask you, do you ever read any of this crap you write?, Iam sure it makes sense to some one.
HAPPY HUNTING

I really debated before posting this because I don't want you think that I'm attacking you, or trying to start a flame war (as is clearly happening above), or whatever. I find you to be an entertaining, informative, and prolific poster.
That being said, I do feel that your constant attacks on those who choose not to do reviews is unjust.There are many reasons why people choose not to do them, and it doesn't necessarily mean that they are not contributing members of this community. I try to pass as much info as I can in chat, and on the boards, and I do try to help my fellow hobbyists whenever I can. Is this not contributing? I don't post as often as some, but I do when I have knowledge of something, or an answer to a question. Does this not help as well?  
When I first joined this site a few years ago, I decided not to do reviews. Mostly because I felt if I had nothing new to add or say about the lady there was no reason.  What more can be said about someone like Ali, (although I have yet to see Ali) who has pages of glowing reviews? I felt the time was personal, now obviously not everyone feels that way and that's fine, but I respect both points of view. I would post a review in the case of an ROB, if there was a drastic discrepancy with previous reviews, or if one was requested. This hasn't happened to me yet. (I did post an overview of a sesion once on this board, and that was at the lady's request, as she had been gone for a while)
You are right, because I owe a lot to those that have done the reviews. However, if there is nothing new to say I don't really understand why the "blow by blow" of a session is required. That being said I guess all I'm trying to say in this (long winded) post, is don't negate the contribution of anyone simply because they do not post reviews . I am VERY grateful to all the guys that do, and thanks for being one. Glad your first PSE was a great experience for you, and hope it just keeps getting better. Take Care LR


-- Modified on 8/11/2003 9:01:32 PM

is unreasonable !  ... what you're saying that is!  

i (sorta) respect people's choices in this and other matters. afterall, it's a FREE country if not an entirely "free" TER!

i once started a lengthy and heated debate on this issue on the NY Board, on which i was the most out-spoken and virulent defender of the (slight) priority of those who contribute to the database ... btw that's my only POV or beef, the database ... i'm aware and appreciative of folks posting informative and timely announcements to the boards

believe me i have no reason to relive the animus of that previous episode on NY(Board)PD! ... if anything i'm becoming more and more understanding of the "plight" of the non-reviewers ... but what i find hard to swallow, is non-reviewers who intimidate and boss around supposed "newbies" (but let's not go there and rehash all the nonesense)

----

i for one, think it's high time we put behind us the incessant talk of shills, reps, "seniors", experts, insiders and all that swaggering that goes with the turf (i agree i've contributed my share of it to the debate) ... and get down to the REAL business of this board ... scoring prime USDA (or AVN!) certified PSE nookie!  LOL

as i keep saying about msg boards all over the internet:  it's all good, it's all bad, it's all either your cup-o-tea or someone else's cup-o-poision! ... in other words YMMV/IMHO fully instantiated


[gently putting mike on its stand]  peace!  

OMG!!!!!!  I sooooooooooo want to change my name on this board now- from now on I shall be referred to as Prime USDA Certified PSE Nookie. That rocks! Hey maybe I should be Prime Certified USDA PSE Nikki Nookie, just so not to cause confusion.
shit!!!   Too many damned characters!  The Acronym for it sucks too...not at all sexy (PUSDACPSENN) ewww, sounds kinda Draconian or something. (sorry for the nerdy Sci-Fi reference)
dammit dammit all to hell!!!
I'll just have to stick to my original ideas for alternate nicks:
Princess Lay-Ya
or I thought the hawaiian sounding CumOnIWannaLeiYa had a nice ring to it
hmmm decisions, decisions...

(MichaelCA,I have to apologize for all the bitchy posts of mine you're going thru tonite... I'm in a particularly naughty sarcastic mood- yeah thats something new, huh?- wanna come punish me properly??? I'm home this week, bored, and as we all know, the BF is History.... there's a big empty space on his former side of the bed, you could come give me a big birthday present, I'll supply the party hats... I didn't move to a city they call "the Big Easy" for nothing, you know... WINK
hey, I'll even throw in some beads to sweeten the deal???)

E O M

Hey, it's four days after your birthday, you already got your presents, and a hell of a big birthday party.... stop yer whinin' (And you better bring ME some beads the next time you come to Philly !) - lol

Love to accomodate Nikki, sounds like fun. Sadly, no big presents from me, my nickname is PeeWee Anyway, NOLA must be murder in this heat. Let me know next time you head to LA and I will start taking my vitamins and get the pacemaker a new battery!

lostronin,

If a person chooses not to post reviews, that's his perogative... and some of your points are well taken.  And if you don't post to the database, but contribute useful and thoughtful information to the boards, that counts for a lot in it's stead.  I just think that you should consider posting reviews on a case-by-case basis, as opposed to a blanket decision not to post based on a "what more needs to be said" philosophy.  Sometimes the lady has little or no reviews posted, so in that case yours could be valuable.  In other cases, the ladies performance may have changed, for better or worse, and that would be a good reason to post a review.  I agree that if you go to her reviews and there's three pages of them, all 9's and 10's, then you probably couldn't add anything that would contribute to someone's deciding to see her or not, but there are some cases when a review is helpful.

Just MHO

while i agree with you guys that girls like Naughty Ali who have pages after page of stellar reviews may not *need* more reviews my question is does it *hurt* to add them? here's what i mean:

as absurdly anal as it seems, there are members here like Mathesar  (and to a much lesser extent me) who do some statistical analysis on provider reviews (regression, mean scores, price/performace ratios, etc). Mathesar regularly posts these to the LA board and i think many of his fellow hobbyists find his reports very useful and informative (it helps them spend their money wisely). let's face it, this is an *expensive* hobby. i figure the average serious GFE hobbyist spends at least $1K/month and in some parts of the country that's the mortgage on a freaking house (not in Boston though, here that barely gets you closet space!

i know this sounds ridiculous to some of the ladies and perhaps it is, kinda like guys memorizing the stats on their favourite sports teams  but i think that as long as you have something NEW to add it's worth doing it and in a way you owe it to your fellow brothers as well as the girls you like and patronize to do it.

when i joined TER i looked up a few of my ATFs and whenever appropriate added on iota of new information, whether to correct inaccurate statements or to give an alternative take on folks' descriptions of her, her education, her looks, etc  ... this is why i make a point to add a TRIVIA section to my reviews to mention these things

too much information is NOT a bad thing as long as its TRUE and informative and adds to the knowledge base .. but then i think this was essentially the point lostronin was making, i'm just adding a variation on the argument, perhaps both pro and con!

$0.03

who don't have new reviews posted for a while tends to get ignored.

Mathesar puts a lot of work into his stats, but in the end, its nothing but entertainment for guys who would rather talk about it then do it.
HAPPY HUNTING

bwahaha Pimp Sugah Daddy E!


There's this one line that's killing me from the bitch bettah have my money song, BTW, Singleton...

"yah picture me paying for some pussy I ain't even smelled yet"

which brings us right back to the thread about Kiki kinda sorta... what a Co-Inky-Dink!!!!

In my HO... hehehe

god im such a fucking classless smartass
but i remember to hold my pinky finger out!
(or sometimes instead, my middle finger)
better to be a smartass than a dumbass!

DAMN you are quick! ... and smart and CUTE!  

i didn't even put 2-n-2 together with that line (Ja Rule & Kiki, i mean) ... and i considahs mah-selves da sharp "ho-mo" round here!

LOL


----------------------------------------
Chorus x2:
It ain't easy pimped out
Flossing furs
Diamonds
Matching sets his and hers
Keep ya hoes on point
Tell them watch the fuzz
Cause
Bitch better have my money!