OK, here is one thing I will never understand.  There's alot of talk about price and availability on here.  That's great, but this website, it seems to me is about REVIEWS.  Unless I am completely mistaken it is even in the title of the website. However, the people in charge of the review site refuse to give any reviews on any provider who doesn't like getting reviewed and will stop reviewing women who get upset about bad reviews.  Please explain to me why a review site decides on what providers to review based on whether or not they like the idea of getting reviewed?

Some hobbyists tend to review the ladies w/o asking the lady if she could be reviewed. When I provide my Model Release Form to the Pornstars I meet, I have some blocks were they check off what I am permitted to say, show or post so that there isn't any misunderstandings.

Some recent busts in major cities, have caused several local and Pornstars to ask for their reviews to be removed afraid that it might be used against them in the court of law.

Although, TER board is mainly of reviews, they can't post what the ladies don't want for the same reasons that you would not want your DNS, Computer Name, IP Address and other information be shown publicly.

As you can see, I've posted less than 1/2 of my 53 PSE meetings to date, mainly because the ladies asked me not to and others because the were too old to post based on TER's guidelines.

Hope this helps....

Doc

Doc,

See your point but it is a problem. The TER is meant to be a guideline a map. If certain individuals cannot be posted then it is very difficult for the buyer to make an accurate determination as to whether or not to spend his money. If what you say is true and the providers can be busted for what is on the review sheets, then hell why not shut down the whole review board.

That is what the backchanneling is meant to be, which I do get a large doze of it in a daily basis and don't mind helping (Reading & Replying) others.

Some of you ask me why I get extra mileage that some of you don't?  well here is one of the answers, besides being a gentlemen with them, I respect their wishes (THE LADIES DO READ THE BOARDS FYI) and they DO thank me for it in many ways.

I think most of you guys have been very well informed and did not HAVE TO go thru what those of us went thru in the 80's and early 90's were boards or backchanneling were not available. You should be VERY Grateful and Thankful you have something and someone’s willing to share their experiences as limited as you might think it is, which I totally differ but like anything else, nothing is never enough for some......Greediness!

As for the providers getting busted, you misinterpreted what I meant to say, which is that's what the ladies think could happen not what TER or I think.

Cheers,

Doc

-- Modified on 10/3/2002 6:40:16 PM

I think I understand?  What is backchanneling? Is that where you can find out about a provider like we do informally on these discussion boards? In any event I see your logic.

-- Modified on 10/3/2002 6:32:57 PM

Very interested in seeing or getting some ideas about the form you have porn stars fill out that you mentioned at the beginning of this thread. I'd love to see or hear about the details of this and the what and why behind it.
Thanks
Rick2

The Model Release form that I use, is very similar to the ones the ladies sign each time they shoot a scene/film.

Since you are well connected with the ladies, it should be easy for you to get one and modify it with the information regarding our hobby (i.e., Reviews, Show Photos, etc...)

Hope this helps....

Doc

-- Modified on 10/4/2002 6:28:13 PM

So if I understand, seth, if a woman told you that she didn't want you to tell other people how terrible she was as a provider because she wouldn't make as much money off of people if they knew how bad she was, you would agree to this in order to appear more gentlemanly?

I don't need to further explain myself. My observation was very clear and I'm truly sorry that some don't understand. The ladies, agencies and hobbyists know that I call it as it happens with no distinction.

Cheers,

Doc
PS. BTW, OhBlah, have you forgotten my rant on the boards recently of my last meeting with LDM, and my pledges to others to talk about their bad experiences, which they have with agencies and providers such as Jean Kelly, Savanna Staxx, J.R. and others? I guess not!

-- Modified on 10/4/2002 7:18:01 PM

Doc has never failed to post a bad review if the lady deserved it, regardless of the lady or the agency.  He's always been accurate and honest about any provider he's seen.

One has to respect the wishes of a lady who wants to remain under the radar, and if they aren't publicly known to escort, as a gentleman I wouldn't review her.  But in that case, whether she was good or bad wouldn't matter, since she's not offering her services openly, so guys aren't going to get burned.  The discrete  stars are almost always referred via backchannel by other hobbyists or pornstars, who wouldn't recommend them if they weren't good...  in my experience, the girls who are not openly advertising are almost always great dates.  I've only seen a couple of "under the radar" adult stars, and they've all been exceptional.