"GFE"

Clearly "GFE" is a term of art to designate an especially wonderful level of service, and, while many girls merit such a description, it now appears that every other f*cking ads touts "GFE! GFE!"  

It's even the title of Soderbergh's new flick....

Just like the "here's MY stimulus package!" ads, it's time to stop using this term ad naseum!

Of course, that's just my opinion....I could be wrong!  

Is anyone else annoyed over the big hulabaloo regarding Miss California Carrie Prejean's "nude" photos?  Come on!  Talk about the height of hypocricy!!! These pagents parade these women around in bikini's, and in Carrie's case pagent owner Donald Trump even paid for her boobs.  They then try to legitimitize it by throwing in a so-called "talent" portion (like baton-twirlling) and a question and answer session (which usually shows just how dumb these women are).  Let's face it, beauty pagents are about sex, sex, sex.

Then she poses for a few so-called "nude" photos (which aren't really nude photos... she's topless only and never shows nipples; it's all side-boob), and suddenly people are up in arms about her morality.

Bullshit!

If anything, it's about her views on gay marriage.  Now, as most know, I'm a liberal.  I support anyone's right to marry regardless of sex; but that's just my opinion - people are entitled to their own, and to me it's nothing more than people going after someone because they don't agree with their point of view.

Just my humble opinion.

Re: Monday Rant

Can porn please find some guys who don't look like prison rejects? Who maybe, just maybe, have more than a GED? Stop giving us guys from the 'shallow end of the pool'.

Non-porn:  How stupid do food manufacturers think we are? Anyone looked at how small the containers of yogurt, canned food, and snack foods have become? They keep the same prices and give us less. Grrrrr!

OK, why do they videotape beautiful women as they are being photographed. They are posing for pictures, they aren't moving very much, so why videotape them not moving? I might as well look at the photographs. I always thought it was a stupid waste of time.

I hate when people post ISO's who obviously did NO attempt to search for the info on their own. Too many people ask for information for someone/something that's been discussed (sometimes beaten to death) in recent times.

Here's a tip when doing a search..  change the days to more than just 30.  Do at least 90, but I actually go back and search for a year or two just in case.

ALSO, in addition to the ISO's are those who post ISO's or ask for 411 on a specific provider (whether a CL ad, Eros ad, etc) and instead of offering any kind of information of value is these WK shills who are like "Oh, she's got no reviews don't see her. Go with a trusted TER name like *insert girl here*"  The guy is asking for info on a specific person, if you don't have any don't throw out the name for your ATF just so you can beef up her advertising and drum up business. I rarely, if ever, post looking for info on someone but if I do the LAST thing I'd want is someone ignoring what I'm looking for and throwing a name out there just to throw a name out there.

That new James T. Kirk is a pussy! (spoilers, dude)

He does nothing but get his ass beat in that new movie!  He gets pummelled by Romulans (thrice), a Vulcan (twice), and humans (once)!  That was NOT the Captain Kirk ANYBODY knows.

Although, it is weird that to the Classic Spock, all the "Ultimate" Star Trek characters he meets look and SOUND identical to their Classic counterparts.  He has no problem recognizing James T. Kirk and Montgomery Scott the moment he lays eyes on them.