Porn Stars

Re: Californication....
The Moose 26 Reviews 898 reads
posted

Not only is it way too intrusive, but with the severe budget crisis in California, they have much more significant things to be worried about...

Here is an article that appeared in the January 8, 2010 issue of the "Cal-OSHA Reporter."  Sorry I couldn't provide a link, but there is no on-line edition, it is delivered by e-mail in PDF format to subscribers only.  Cal-OSHA stands for the California Occupational Safety and Health Administration, the state agency responsible for creating and enforcing workplace safety regulations.

Health Group Petitions Cal-OSHA for Adult Film Performer Protections

Los Angeles' AIDS Healthcare Foundation (AHF) has petitioned the Cal-OSHA Standards Board to do what the group has not been able to do through the legislative process-force adult-film production companies to protect workers from sexually transmitted dieases.

The petition seeks to add language to California's bloodborne pathogens standard, General Industry Safety Order 5193, specifically addressing adult-film production.  "AHF is filing this petition due to the inaction of the adult film industry producers to comply with current Cal-OSHA regulations to take necessary steps to protect performers by providing and enforcing the use of condoms during filming" said president Michael Weinstein.

In fact, AHF says, the industry has "steadfastly refused" to take any steps to protect performers from bloodborne pathogens, "resulting in thousands of employees becoming infected with sexually transmitted diseases," according to the petition.  "Clarification and enhanced enforcement of the rules are called for."

AHF notes Los Angeles County Department of Public Health statistics that document more than 2000 cases of chlamydia and 965 cases of gonorrhea among adult film performers between 2003 and 2007.  Some performers suffer multiple infections in the course of one year, according to AHF.

The petition seeks to add new definitions to 5193 for "adult film" and "sexually transmitted disease," and adds a new section (i) with specific requirments for adult-film production.  It would require such employers to maintain engineering and work practice controls "sufficient to protect employees from exposure to blood and/or any potentally infectious materials."  The controls would include:
-Simulating sex acts using acting, production and postproduction techniques.
-Ejaculation outside workers' bodies.
-Provision of and required use of condoms whenever acts of vaginal and anal sex are filmed, plus provision of condom-safe lubricants.
-Plastic and other disposible materials to clean up sets.

Employers would be required to maintain an exposure control plan per 5193(c), minus the sharps injury log.  They also would be explicitly required to comply with subsection (f) on pre-exposure provision of hepatitis B vaccine to employees and section (g)(2) on training.

Finally, the petition seeks a requirement for employers to provide postexposure prophylactic treatment of HIV for any workers exposed to blood or potentially infectious materials, comprehensive testing for other sexually transmitted diseases "and appropriate treatment for any subsequently diagnosed" diseases.

This is way too intrusive on an industry that does a pretty good job of self-regulation.

Next they'll be in our bedrooms.

Not only is it way too intrusive, but with the severe budget crisis in California, they have much more significant things to be worried about...

mrfrench2321 reads

Frankly, I think in order for any such requirement to stand, they're going to first have to go to the U.S. Supreme Court and get Roe v. Wade overturned.

"Why?" You might ask.

Simple: While most people remember Roe v. Wade as the case that made abortion legal, it had some interesting side effects.  The one that applies here is the basic rule that a woman has the right to do what she wants with her body short of taking her own life.  A good lawyer could make the claim that if a woman has the right to kill a baby, then she has the right to (a) risk pregnancy and (b) risk disease if she so chooses and the government cannot interfere with those rights.  Note that this would likely apply only to being on the receiving end of disease.  It would never be ok to knowingly do something that would pass on a disease.

Just a layman's opinion...

fasteddie511001 reads

if in fact it had any chance of passing, is drive a multi-billion dollar industry out of California, taking along with it the tax dollars generated by the industry and further stressing an already near-bankrupt state economy.

But I don't think it would be an overnight process. THe industry is so established there and there is so much talent there, it would take a lot to relocate the industry. However, I'm sure Miami would welcome them with open arms.

What I find funny is the measures that would have to be taken.  "Simulating sex" through "post production techniques."  How about that, computer generated animation for porn!  Then there is "ejaculation outside workers' bodies."  Come shots will be required by law!!  (But if it's a come in face, would she have to wear eye protection?)

Register Now!