Most of us have learned to rely on TER for help in choosing a provider.  While there are ways that providers can fake reviews at least there is some help, I can't imagine being a hobbyist 10 years ago without TER help.  Does anyone buy the "I want to keep a low profile" bullshit?  I think that it ONLY means she doesn't deliver as promised.  Can anyone dispute?

Reo you think "Not having a review" means she's lousy?

well i know a wonderful lady her in the california area that has about 10 to 15 providers and she doesnt allow them to be reviewed at all . She used to be a provider herself. I am like you I have been burned and am very untrusting with out a few reviews. But i have had a few that where not reviewed that where good . But its rare

the hottest smokin' piece of zero body fat porn girl ass I've laid my hands on is unreviewed, and will remain so.  It looked like and long shot and I struck gold, that time, but I don't expect things to work out that way very often.

Reo you think "Not having a review" means she's lousy?

I can understand a guy not wanting to write a review because...he doesn't feel like writting them or have the time.  If both the latter aren't the case why withold good info?  Oh, I guess you don't want to share your hidden treasure.  But, face it, unless you're paying a girl a monthly stipend and set her up in an apartment, she's seeing a lot of men and is not a secret.  Even setting a girl up isn't a guarantee of exclusivity.  What other reason would a you guys not write a review of a provider?

I never mention that I am a member of TER.  It's none of their business and they have no right to tell me not to write a review.  I can start my own weblog and document every encounter if I choose to do so with exacting detail.  A provide may get to know me, but they don't have to know my alias on this site, so why keep a provider unreviewed?

I know for a fact that the "I want to keep a low profile" is not 100% bullshit 100% of the time. The problem is, you can't tell. Again the value of TER is that you can get info on unreviwed ladies by asking. You may get a simple "she's real, 8/7" or more. That's a review, technically, but with NO juicy details. 100% of the time I hear the "I want to keep a low profile" excuse and it's not BS, the reason is wanting to keep the juicy details private.

Obviously this means that ROBs and other crappy providers can attempt to hide behind the "I want to keep a low profile" bullshit. your only remedy is to ask the TER community.

Those of us who post reviews of our meetings have to walk a fine line between being a gentleman and being loyal to our fellow hobbyists.

I don't know about others, but I feel that a bad experience MUST be reported, regardless of the ladies feelings about keeping a low profile... it's only fair to others who read and rely on these boards.

However, some providers really like to have reviews posted, some don't care one way or another, others don't mind the review, but ask that details not be discussed, and a few just want to keep things as low key as possible... If the meeting was a good one,  I'll always ask if they'd mind my posting a review, and I always honor thier wishes.  But if the meeting is a poor one, I don't bother to ask... I just post it.  I try not to be mean about it, but I'll be sure to lay out the facts as objectively as I can.

Some of you have stated that if a girl is listed on an agency or advertises on an escort mall then it's obvious that they do indeed escort, and asking not to be reviewed is BS; but the fact is that "escorting" in the strictest sense of the word is not illegal, but having sex for money is; so those that do not want reviews posted are often concerned about having a review come back and bite them on the ass in the event of a criminal prosecution.

A similar issue exists in posting pictures of a meeting... I've been with ladies that not only don't mind, but like having photos of our session posted and emailed around... it's free advertising.  But others don't, and I had one pornstar who didn't mind me taking photos/video or  posting "glamour shots" from the meeting, but didn't want any intimate photos posted for fear of them being used by LE if it ever came to that.  Having reviews posted can raise a similar concern with a cautious provider.

I also tend to think that finding no reviews for a particular lady, especially a big name, can be a good sign... I've seen several ladies who openly escorted and were spectacular, but asked that I didn't review the meeting.  But If someone had a bad experience with a pornstar, I'm sure he'd be likely to shout it from the rooftops after spending upwards of $2000 and having a lifelong fantasy shattered.  In fact, the higher the fee and the bigger the fantasy, the more likely someone would be to expose her as a lousy date.