Porn Stars

I'm Sorry...
jacksonlips 56 Reviews 3788 reads
posted
1 / 15

I saw Lynn the other day in Santa Monica and had an amazing time with her.  I had heard so much negative talk about her in some reviews...I just don't get it.  She was beautiful, in shape, and as passionate and sweet as could be.  Not sure what is going on with some of these guys and the negativity.  I refuse to believe I "caught her on a good day."  She's terrific.

Top number on her profile is accurate.  949 number isn't.

Have fun,

Jacksonlips

kpwcchs 7 Reviews 2820 reads
posted
2 / 15

Glad she is doing well I allways liked her. Does she travel? Would love for her to be my 1st PSE..Where do you find her profile at? I'm kinda new at all this computer jazz...Thanks

Holeshot 14 Reviews 3294 reads
posted
3 / 15


END OF MESSAGE

armon 41 Reviews 2433 reads
posted
4 / 15

Awwww Yes! saw her a few years, one of my best PSE's ever, just like her videos.

bellamodels 3382 reads
posted
5 / 15

This picture was taken at the last Porn Star Karaoke that Luke Ford covered.

stwilliams 12 Reviews 2975 reads
posted
6 / 15

ohhh...shit...I like the first pictures

Notice 1823 reads
posted
7 / 15

Cannot go by Luke Ford's pics. It's wellknown in industry that his pics are worst on the planet.

ZedEx 3155 reads
posted
8 / 15

Well known?  Point a digital camera and click, how bad can it be?  I don't how 'well known' your claim is but I'd far rather see a candid shot over a glossy studio shot to judge just how someone really looks.

bellamodels 2868 reads
posted
9 / 15

I didn't say the Luke Ford picture was a bad picture just that it was more recent than the ones that were put up before it. When I saw her name I remembered seeing those pictures when I was reading lukeisback.com a few weeks ago. I just did a search on freeones.com and found several more professional recent pictures of her such as the one I've included below. I used to book Lynn LeMay years ago (at least over 5 years ago to be exact) and she was certainly one of the best reviewed PSE's then.

captainned 6 Reviews 1866 reads
posted
10 / 15

Have to agree with Zed, it does not look like time has been agreeable with Lynn, but hey, I have never seen her either.

plmokn 41 Reviews 2089 reads
posted
11 / 15

but I wouldn't call that picture flattering, either

vector7 8 Reviews 2738 reads
posted
12 / 15

I won't express my personal feelings regarding what I think of how she looks.  There are a few of you who feel passionately about her, and that is a good thing.

However I will say this about photos taken by Luke Ford.  He uses a camera, he points it, and he snaps away, nothing more, nothing less.  He catches the girls au natural, no smoke, no mirrors, no airbrushing.  If there is a bad photos, of a girl who is just standing there, not photos taken from a video, when she's all hot and sweaty, then the photos is a fair representation of how the girl looks.

The camera doesn't lie. It takes (a photo) what it see's,it has nothing to do with the operator.

bellamodels 3024 reads
posted
13 / 15

Neither picture is flattering. I posted the second picture to show that even with the right lighting, etc. she still doesn't look good (I didn't want anyone to think I was being mean by posting the first picture) but then again from her review it seems like her rate is $300 per hour so I guess you get what you pay for! In Luke Ford's defense, this picture of Lexxi Tyler and McKenzie Lee was also taken by him. His camera doesn't lie!

juggghead 2289 reads
posted
14 / 15
novamike88 4 Reviews 1927 reads
posted
15 / 15

tells the truth, since beauty is ultimately subjective. Look closer. What do you see? Whatever it is, that's what you get.

Register Now!