After what several hobbyists have been experiencing lately and the reasons many hobbyists including myself would not meet any provider that is not capable of showing us her recent photos something that several of us have done from our own experiences, Do you hobbyists think the Agencies that contract the ladies should at least screen the ladies "PERSONALLY" and not use an enhanced/edited old photo sent by the provider to avoid such disappointments?
Should independent PS do the same?
Is it so hard to ask the ladies to go to a studio and take some photos or take some digital shots for their promotion instead of posting 5 year old photos and/or when they were at their prime?
The bottom line is that we are the ones dishing out large sums thinking that the lady still looks like in her videos, magazines and promotional AD's the reasons why some hobbyist’s meeting photos and vidcaps have become so helpful for this hobby and hobbyists.
Inquiring minds wants to know?
Doc PS. I just saw a recent photo of a new PS provider and it was 180 degrees that of her promotional ones used by her agents and Official Website and the reasons for expressing many hobbyists and my concerns here publicly.
It remembers me when I met Sienna were I was expecting her as brunette from all the videos I had seen of her in addition of her most recent photos the Agency had sent me, which were physically accurate except that she was blond when I met her but she looked AWESOME though.
Others that have seen Aja a.k.a. Barby preferred her brunette look than her current blondsish look too but at least these two ladies only problem was their hair color change and not their looks that other PS have dramatically changed and aged negatively.
I have personally seen several 40ish PSE's and they were all looking AWESOME and better than in their videos.....
A resounding YES! Although typically the experience may still be what or close to what is expected from a PSE, you should still be entitled to know what to expect from an appearance standpoint currently. This would avoid any problems and would not create unrealistic expectations, as many times the makeup artist on set can do a PHENOMINAL job at making a person look entirely different than they do in real life. IMHO.
Angencies and escorts have always tried to bait and switch. Old pictures is a form of bait and switch. I really don't think the agencies will change. They are in it for the buck and really don't care what tactics they use to seperate you from your funds. The only way to put an end to this tactic is to continue to post and stop using the offending agencies.
GOT A CHANCE TO SEE MONTANA GUNN IN NYC. HER PICS FROM BODYMIRACLES LOOK AWSOME BUT THATS NOT THE CASE WHEN THE DOOR OPENS. GRANTED SHE IS ON OF THE NICEST WOMAN IVE MET BUT HER PICS ARE VERY OFF AND THE ONLY PEOPLE I BLAME IS THE AGENCIES LIKE BODYMIRACLES.
Sorry folks. My opinion is that the burden is on the buyer. The reason you seek to meet any provider is that she'll meet your depraved lust. If your depraved lust is from years past, its your obligation to consider how the years have treated your fantasy. If Nikki Dial lit your fire 5 years ago, do you think age and gravity were any kinder to her than other mortals? How does Mike Tyson measure up to your expecation from years ago? How does Worldcom measure up to your expectation of years ago? They were both recently marketed as superstars, but proved not to be. Is it the marketers fault, or yours?
You make a strong point and I thank you for your opinion.
The reason I have only seen 47 PS is because of me being extreemly selective in the fantasy, looks & requirements department that would make a lady a GFE/PSE. If one of the criterias aren't met it is a no go for me. I have yet to meet my Ultimate PSE if I choose to but since she does not meet several of my requirements is a no go.
My .02 cents...
Doc PS. BTW, those that saw Nikki Dial this past January in Vegas can tell you that she is looking BETTER than ever and not worse due to age or work...Some ladies just age real fine........
To a certain extent, we are dealing with fungible goods here. I mean, if Jaguar wants to sell you a new XK8, are they going to show you a photo of a 1995 one?
For the commission the agencies charge, it should be de rigeur that recent photos be taken. It is just too irresponsible otherwise.
There should be a certain amount of caveat emptor, this is true, but the agencies have at least an equal amount, if not greater of responsibility to make sure the provider looks as represented on the website.
Unfortunately it looks like your attempt to purchase VIP membership has failed due to your card being declined. Good news is that we have several other payment options that you could try.
VIP MEMBER
, you are now a VIP member!
We thank you for your purchase!
VIP MEMBER
, Thank you for becoming VIP member!
Membership should be activated shortly. You'll receive notification!
