I did read your first message and it was vague so I asked for clarification. I never suggested that you would give out info on UTR ladies on a public forum but, to be blunt, you have no business giving it out in private either unless the lady in question has given you permission to do so. Your "screening", whatever that may mean, is irrelevant. UTR means UTR. The info is given out at the lady's behest, not simply because you are moving on and think it's OK.
I am a long time reader of this forum, but declined to contribute in the discussion threads for personal reasons. I am moving on to a different phase of my life. Over the years, members of this forum have asked about the availability of numerous porn stars and models. Though I may have known the answer, I was not at liberty to divulge this information. Given that I remained in the shadows for so long, I have decided to share this information on a very limited basis. I will not divulge any names publicly on the forum. If you are interested, You may e-mail me for further information at max.powers0123456789 at gmail.com. Please be prepared for thorough screening. I am not a full member of TER, and do not have access to private messages sent here.
looks like Agent 007 is alive and well..i am so excited..or is it Austin Powers?...or is it Mad Max?..
This response serves as a good example of why I did not participate actively in the forum.
here is a good example for you Max.." no one really cares "...
Outing UTR providers.
You obviously did not read my original message. Where exactly do I mention anything about outing UTRs?
Hypothetically, even if I did have information on UTRs, I would certainly not divulge it in the open forum, and it would only be given to trusted individuals privately. I distinctly mentioned that individuals will be screened. That is the same requirement that the agencies that are talked about around here do when they accept members.
Max, why do you need to screen people? You're not an agency and you're not providing. Maybe I'm just cynical, but a hobbyist requiring screening info prior to sharing info sounds fishy...
Hypothetically, even if I did have information on UTRs, I would certainly not divulge it in the open forum, and it would only be given to trusted individuals privately. I distinctly mentioned that individuals will be screened. That is the same requirement that the agencies that are talked about around here do when they accept members.
I never said I would be doing the screening. I simply said that there would be screening involved.
My original post was genuine. It was an offer to help out others in this community. My contact information is there if you want to discuss the matter further. For those who are skeptical about the validity of it, or do not feel comfortable with the conditions, I understand. No one is twisting your arm.
I did read your first message and it was vague so I asked for clarification. I never suggested that you would give out info on UTR ladies on a public forum but, to be blunt, you have no business giving it out in private either unless the lady in question has given you permission to do so. Your "screening", whatever that may mean, is irrelevant. UTR means UTR. The info is given out at the lady's behest, not simply because you are moving on and think it's OK.
How exactly do you know that I do not have permission to disseminate whatever information I have? You are jumping the gun here.
I haven't accused you of anything. Simply asking what your intentions are and offering opinions.
That's what we do here...
I don't see a single question asked in your posts. What I do see is quite a bit of sanctimonious proselytizing based upon false assumptions, and a tone that distinctly is accusatory in nature.
I am certain that these hypothetical UTRs whose privacy you are so concerned about protecting will appreciate your efforts as their self-appointed guardian.
-- Modified on 6/13/2013 12:37:35 AM
Seem to have struck a nerve...
Hopefully you are aware that Fast Eddie's noble attempt of aggregation and "discrete" sharing of UTR information was an utter failure that resulted in the outing of many people. For that I will always consider him a raging ego-centric dick. Even if the guys you share information with agree to keep it private they will very likely share it with someone else under the same condition and inevitably there is a dick out there that doesn't respect an UTR's right to privacy. It only takes one dick to release it publicly.
This is not my first trip to the rodeo, so to speak. I am aware of instances where the dissemination of certain types of information has resulted in unfortunate consequences. By the same token, I am also well aware of the hypocritical stance taken by a cadre of individuals here who feel that they are the only ones worthy of possessing certain information. I personally despise such elitism. It is also naive to believe that sharing of such information does not occur all the time in private. If it did not, UTRs would only be meeting one person. Just like in real life, if she tells you that you are the only one she has ever slept with...
Wrong. Not spreading UTR information doesn't mean that the UTR only has one client. It means that it is the UTR or her agent's prerogative alone to disseminate such information.