UK foreign secretary is going to be there for the opening.

And you do realize numerous Dems have come out against the deal, right?

the Iran deal, what will happen in the unlikely event Congress has a veto proof vote against it?

Please explain that to me.  

Vox is a far left "Obama walks on water website" and you have a lib opinion writer saying its "largely" untrue. LOL

would need to go to war. Look at this list of military and Mossad officials who supported the deal as of August 5. I'd guess the list is even longer now that these guys had the courage to break with Benji publicly.  Remember Benji barely got re-elected.  Sorry Doctor Gonzo but it is time for some new thinking in Israel just as is needed in Iran.  

I gave you my plan and Iran would be begging us to stop if it were imposed.

And please tell us what is in the rest of the secret side deals not made public.

We're you laughing when your hero got smoked AGAIN at the bargaining table? By terrorists? And we have to ask permission and wait 24 days to inspect a site? LOL
   
Yeah we were all laughing at that one.

I just have a problem with capitulation.

And I wasn't expecting you to answer my question because you can't as the author of your piece is clearly speculating and has no facts to back up there knee jerk Obama suck up article

Your hero does, and refuses to act.

Just a guess.  

Remember that major faux pas of yours? LOL

I truly believe Iran has lied and connived their way to getting everything they wanted out of this; the end of sanctions, the resumption of commerce that will bring in hundreds of billions of dollars into their coffers and the continuation of their efforts to develop a nuclear arsenal will continue unabated.

Then you question givng the Cubans the same respect becuase the country is poor?
They both represent the same thing Jack.
So this is why the GOP scum is a party of hypocrisy and cowards.
 

Like said, I don't give credence to anything coming out of Fox. As far as getting news, BBC, Al Jazeera, Washington Post, Times, The Guardian, Times of India. No, I don't get news from any single source or do I watch Faux Fake News or the Confused News Network. Both are 7x24 news comedy for unintelligent, partially educated sheep population.

first you deny it was a lie, and then you start debating the meaning of the word, right out of the lefty playbook.  

And what would the target be, Doctor Gonzo?

However, the Republican's and a few Democrats with a large Jewish voting blocks do. That's why they can beat their chests and talk about how tough they are.  They know they've got nothing to lose!

When did I ever say Netanyahu "would start a naval blockade?"

Apparently so. LOL

You do that shit to me all the time, misquoting me intentionally, setting up a straw man that's easy to knock down. It was one of the main reasons I quit talking to you for quite some time. I don't mind defending my own words, but I am not going to spend the entire day "setting the record straight" when you deliberately misquote my words because you can't dispute what I actually said. So, you simply "make shit up"

You think a deal that Obama capitulated on, with secret side deals not all known, with a terrorist state that has a history of not honoring its deals, that has killed US soldiers with its technology, and us giving it $150bn to fund their terrorism, and allowing them to have advanced missile technology with NO dismantling of their nuke problem and NO American hostage release is a GOOD deal Matt?  

ou actually think the "powers to be" in Cuba give a shit about their people's poverty?

Nothing new here. Some really believe that the Castro boys are going to GIVE the money to the people. Yep! They are real humanitarians those ruthless dictators

but somehow they believe that giving the Mullahs of Iran, or Raul Castro billions of dollars is going to raise the standard of living for the average Cuban or Iranian. Anyone have the slightest idea how many billions of dollars we have spent in places like Haiti?  and just look at all the good that has done for the Haitian people

You're so cute when you get your dander up!

Nice try. You give me a choice of whether it's a good deal or a bad deal. And, on what basis does one make that judgement. One criterion would be whether it de-incentivize the Iran's significantly enough that they slow or stop development of a nuclear weapon. Neither one of us will know, for a while, whether it will.  Given that you can't prove there can be a better deal made, and that I have no faith in your proposed solutions to stopping their nuclear capabilities, and because it's a done deal, I will hope the it works. I would hope that you would hope so too!  

Not only is it a bad deal, but it's pretty obvious Obama lied once again to the American public to ram a deal through he KNEW the American public would not accept if they knew the facts.

Yes, we can "hope" all we want, Matt. But history tells me appeasing evil always works out badly for people of goodwill.

Lying Arrogant Fapping Fraudulent Yammerer does that to you, me and everyone for that matter. He does not care whether the person is on the boards or in the news. He just comes up with some fiction in his little mind and posts it without regard to the facts, truth, reasonableness or reality. He just says you or whomever said it. Then he runs and hides.

treaties or international agreements. Seldom, if ever, do both sides trust each other!  

Apparently, that is not part of his "plan" anymore, or at least not if Israel goes alone. Apparently, we were suppose to know this. So I'm lost- Jack is sure Israel will do "something" if the Iran agreement is ratified

but it would certainly not surprise me that if Israel is convinced that sooner or later, most likely sooner, Iran is going to get nukes, and that sooner or later they are going to try to make good on their threats to wipe Israel off the map. It would make a LOT more sense to take them on now, before they can use their upcoming financial windfall to rearm themselves and make themselves a MUCH more formidable enemy.

but I doubt the Israelis are quite as convinced as you.

and Russia is not going to attack Israel any more than we are going to send troops into Georgia or the Ukraine.

We are talking about Iran, there are hardly a BILLION Iranians, but you are getting better, instead of being wrong by a factor of 50, you've cut it down to being wrong by a factor of only 12.

What dumbass thought it would be a good idea you might ask?

It's the protection it gives Hamas and Hezbollah knowing they have a nuke on their side.

should “consider” a naval blockade? Iran has installed batteries of Sun Burn anti ship missiles along the Persian Gulf and Strait of Hormuz and if, you believe this report, is now mass producing a new generation  of long range anti ship cruise missiles.

H' mm I wonder if iran is going to have any free cash in the near future.

I know when I want an accurate description of Russia's military capability, my first inclination is to trust a source called Tea Party Economist, what with them being experts and all

Again, this is exactly the kind of person who's reporting on Russia's military force you should be trusting, clearly he is very qualified to comment on such a topic!

Can you name two international agreements Iran has not honored?

You first said that a blockade was "1960's thinking." So your absurd argument is that it's "2012 thinking" now? What, did you warp into a time machine and launch yourself 50 years into the future? Smart of you to backtrack though as you were embarrassing yourself with that nonsense.

The U.S. Destroyer was in the Black Sea at the time and was buzzed by the Russian SU-24. Ask yourself why would Russia choose to divulge the existence of such a weapon during peacetime, giving valuable time for the U.S. Navy to develop a countermeasures. Also, what are the odds that TWENTY-SEVEN sailors would then immediately ask to be discharged; and just as important, what are the odds such information would become so publicly dispersed?

Don't you know they possess the sunburn anti-ship missile? LOL