I would suggest that all of you Zionist apologists pay us anti-Zionist's share of the $40 billion. You defend their actions as non offensive and that they never do anything to anyone, well put your money where your mouth is,its time to bow down once again to the holocaust industry.

http://www.newsnet14.com/2008/02/24/jews-to-sue-us-govt-for-40-billion/print/

Quite a rich group of persecuted folk, those Jews.

For the PC worshipper that whined "anti semite" to my below Bush post, you will read on this link that Bush has towed the line in this matter.

... lets get back to the racists versus the sexists in the Demo race.  That gives me a chubby.

under your same line of reasoning can I opt out od paying for a socialized health care plan that I will never be a beneficiary of? or a Social Security system that will never return a dime of the countless hundreds of thousands of dollars to?

I would suggest the socialists pay the share of those that have been speaking out against these socialist programs for years.

As far as the Jew bashing goes, I'm a little bored of it. Kind of like a jukebox that plays only one tune.

""""As far as the Jew bashing goes, I'm a little bored of it. Kind of like a jukebox that plays only one tune""""""

guys like this are something of a curiosity to me...i can't really get my hands around such a cynical view of the world....

I agree with your government waste statements. That can be compared to politicians who advocate moving welfare families into middle and middle/upper class neighborhoods in an effort to promote "diversity". The only thing is while they live in their gated communities it is us who has to live with the lesser publicized "benefits" of these policies.

They should have to pay for these harmful and costly policies and leave the rest of us alone.

More people are dancing to the tune these days,people who five years ago were the same people decrying "racism" and anti-semitism.

Bet you have some really nice tats also.

Chamberlain chose to not stop the whole thing before it ever got off the ground.

after the black reparation suits get settled. There just might not be any money left over you see.

Nope.

You might want to scroll down or go to the next page and read some of my responses to some nitwit that had a screenname "JoeGoebbles" who was trying to bait me into agreeing with his simplistic utterings.

My answer to your question which in a roundaabout way is "are you a nazi" would be this, I was born in 1978, that's 33 years after the fall of Nazi Germany so it would be kinda impossible for me to be a nazi now wouldn't it??

Don't give them any ideas...lol...I am sure they will get around to that one eventually....

I am all for black reparations as long as these are met with reparations that repay this country for all of the welfare,special programs meant to improve conditions for blacks (sec 8 housing), money for criminal incarceration, property crimes,drug crimes,etc...

I think that blacks would be left owing quite a bit to the treasury even after they receieved their share from slavery reparations...lol

Not to be a neonazi  or are you a skinhead?

but you could easily be a "Neo-Nazi" or Neo National Socialist or some such thing.

Whether you are or not relly doesn't interest me, nor does the subject of blaming the jews for everything that wrong with the world either.

No.

Does one have to be to point out facts and ideas that offend the "chosen race".

Its sad that most people,even if the head Zionist figures came right out with it and admitted the facts about media control,Iraq war,etc (which actually some have in publications and other outlets that non-Jews are not supposed to see or read) people would still deny it to save themselves from thinking they are "antisemites" or "nazis".

especially if the responibility was limited to those who could trace the ancestry to being actual slaves or slave owners. Those first, second, and third generation African Americans would not be elligible nor would non africans be liable for reparations if none of their direct ancestors ever owned a slave.

I agree the US treasury would reap a huge windfall if they could ever collect.

of the Civil war to the nation. Try figuring that one out.

I respect you desire of not wanting to get involved in the matter.

I dont think all that is wrong in the world is the fault of Zionists or Jews. The Zionist machine would not be able to operate without the help of non-Jews. And there will always be problems and challenges to overcome in any society no matter how the breakdown of race is.

But isnt something kinda haywire when one group can NEVER be held accountable for anything negative. Isn't there something to that that would lead a reasonable person to believe that the group is pulling some powerful strings.

I have said several times on here that I just believe Jews should be held accountable for their actions,that debate should be allowed on issues like their connection to the Iraq war,the money markets,etc and how their actions affect everyone else. I don't believe in genocide or any other inhumane treatment of which you would all love to connect me to.

I just dont believe that the Jews are any more special than any other group and they should be held accountable just like any other group would be. And they are not and they don't wish to be either, so then you must ask yourself, just what do people who truly want to live free going to do.

I would certainly hope more than just wrapping yourself in the fetile position,staying silent out of fear of being labled a "nazi".

Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, etal. would have to agree to go away and never speak another word.

I have a feeling that will happen when Obama is elected president. Race baiting for profit will become a much harder pill to swallow if that happens.

Then again does any respectable white person,or person of any race for that matter, give a damn about these two anyway???...lol

I would be happy to contribute my share. Actually more than my share considering the fact that my grandparents were born in China and my family doesn't bear the slightest responsibility for what happened here a hundred years ago, much less four hundred, but if it will get Jackson,Sharpton and co to STFU and go away, count me in.

It's going to get 10 times, maybe 100 times worse.

Wow, you really think so????

I am not saying the media will stop trying and certainly the white population who has a terminal case of "white guilt" will not take note. But alot more regular whites then you think are sick and tired of the word play and they already recognize the bias.

All that is needed is a continued and more severe economic downturn. Once those refrigerators are empty people are more likely to care about more than whether they are considered racist or not.

I'd have to respectably disagree. Then again I read some article about how some professor said that whites will be showing they are racist by voting for obama. Some mularkey about them voting for him so they could then carry on their racist ways without worry.....What the hell????

Now that they've got one of their homeys in charge, the feeling of entitlement will become stronger and the calls for new and stronger action will come greater and more results will be expected.

-- Modified on 3/5/2008 7:35:26 PM

rob them spoiled, rich, white folks without having to break in their windows,

Just how are whites held accountable? How are blacks held accountable? How are Latinos held accountable? How do you hold any racial or cultural group accountable when the actions of the group are nothing more than a collection of actions by individuals in that group? Why not start with and stick with holding individuals accountable?

-- Modified on 3/5/2008 8:04:12 PM

there are ways that groups do pay the price of group membership, and that's not always bad.  

For example, laws (and legal structures) often create rights and duties by categories, eg family relationships, industrial classification, etc.

So what he is proposing is laws that come down on jews.  

Yes, laws already come down on categories of people - hopefully people like felons, but it's not always so clear, because many actions aren't always so clear.

and frankly, I'm much rather have people SAYING disagreeable things, and getting them off their chest cheaply, than DOING them, which is more expensive.  

Jesse jackson doesn't make me read the paper.  I do that because I think I need to know what sort of assholarity might be going on out there.

The place *I* draw the line is when some crazy bitch feeds me a ration of shit in the morning, in my own home, instead of a cuppa coffee - because that is involuntary.

I see your point there..

Whites are constantly held as responsible for all the evils ever committed in the world. Slavery (even though blacks did and still do enslave their own people) to the Indians and on and on. I take it that you may have been educated in schools that weren't white guilt factories,saw pre 1950's and 60's. You definatly haven't been in a high school or college classroom in the last 30 years or you would know that "whitey" is the cause of all evil according to the filth that run the schools.

Blacks and Latinos are noted in criminal statistics as having a disproportional amount of their population in jails. Certainly nonwhites are not ever demonized the way whites are but they do get mentioned with negative things,often with some sort of explanation that has "racism" as a root cause of the reason they are where they are.

Jews are never called out as a group for anythiong negative. Trends where jews are involved,the disproportionate amount of jews pulling the strings within the current national defense structure which has formulated proIsreal foreign policy, these points are never pointed out to the public. Most people dont even recognize that many of the people telling them how to think on the boobtube are Jews. Hell up untill about 5 years ago I didn't know,I just thought Krauthammer,Podhertz,Kristol,et all were just ugly white people....lol

Hey, back in 1914 i told you all how this would likely play out with my epic "The Birth of a Nation."

Was i thanked for my efforts?  no, i was called a racist.  The NAACP hounded me and my movie for years.  Thank God Woodrow Wilson stood by mr.

Did Hollywod care?  No, even though that movie single handedly turned the American movie industry into the printing press it has been for the last 90 years.

well, my prophetic and cautionary tale is available on DVD.  Don't try to find it at the library.  Censorship by the usual types.

I'm content to be a prophet without honor.

At long last, posthumous vindication!

Watch my movie, if it the last thing you do.  America's future may depend upon it.

the fact that you can go to single-color countries and find the bottom economic tiers locked up more often, which coincidentally coincides with the economic situation in the USA, couldn't possibly be relevant.

What's important here, for everybody's peace of mind, is to catgorize people before they actually do anything, so that you can just LOOK at somebody, and know right away who the no-goodniks are.  

You can just LOOK at a Bush, or a Pat Robertson, and know that he'd never drive drunk, go over the hill, get mixed up in a banking scam, nor nothing like that.  Shit, it's the Jews and spicks and coons that do that.   Neil Bush's real middle name is Stein, right?

Because we wouldn't want to say anything that would hurt your poor honkie assed self-esteem.

You talk like a little girl on speed.

You got stuck at only two?

JJ does more than talk in public. He's used his talking abilities in private to become a master shake down and extortion artist.

Sharpton's no better. Ever heard of Twanda Brawley?

I couldn't agree with you more. Just watching the bashing is enough for me. I like a good debate. However, I'd rather be watching the Design Channel by that point.

Hugs,
ciara

-- Modified on 3/6/2008 8:01:55 PM

have in mind apart from those 2?

I don't know that they're any more obnoxious than any other lobbyist, and maybe less for being in public - especially with stuff like the aforementioned Tawana B.

Sharpton's appearance alone is a caricature.  Either he's a PR disaster, or only trying to appeal to the homies.

And my response was basically, “What, you can’t think of more than two yourself?. . . You need to know of who I was thinking?

It’s my right to post flat assertions without offering supporting details. It's OK to ignore your question or to answer it in any way I choose. I learned that from you.

You really can’t think of more that the two I cited?