You're right Mein. They'll never, ever, ever, ever admit that electing this guy was a mistake. The battle cries of "Change" and "Anything is better than Bush" will ring in the ears of voters for years. This country needed someone to lead us out of the funk that we're in and he wasn't and isn't the person to do it. BUT, in fairness to the voters and Obama's supporters, McCain ran like he didn't want the job. We were screwed from the git-go but McCain was the better of our bad choices.

"No boots on the ground" he said...

http://www.wcti12.com/news/27257042/detail.html

And what is "Biteme" going to do?.....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Adpa5kYUhCA

This country is heading for a disaster at the hands of the Liberal, left traitors.

Maybe the Marines need to be deployed to Washington DC instead of Libya to protect the innocent civilians.

the NATO coalition is falling apart.

Which means guess who will be left holding the bag?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1368693/Libya-war-Germans-pull-forces-NATO-Libyan-coalition-falls-apart.html

Perhaps you can explain this one.

He has the most White guilt I have seen around here.

Many of those bamboozled are not saying much, or they don't care or even understand what is going on.

is several of the people who voted for BHO have condemned him---see my thread below.

But, how about our previous POTUS ? Think he did a better job than BHO ?!-------LMFAO ! And you don't think folks voted for him because he was a GOP White Christian" ?!----Of course, these folks got more than they bargained for------



-- Modified on 3/23/2011 10:04:41 AM

Nice guy, but truly one of the "believers", I'm sure he is heartbroken to learn his here has "feet of clay" lol

As for Trannyboy, I doubt he has the mental capacity to digest any of this.

The left has certainly turned on the annoited one, but there are still diehards who will support him no matter what. I am happy that you are not one of them, but that doesn't change the fact that there are still lemmings out there who will never admit that they were wrong about Obama.

Black in tan nothing more.

After continual whitey failures as President, I can understand the publics  hope, and their votes for a Black President.
 Hopefully next time, they won't pick a hypocritical impostor.

http://www.hermancain.com/index.asp

Dubya_boy! Dubya! Dubya! Is that yooouuuuuuu!?!

because what you say about the New World Order resonates true to my spirit and with the research I have done.  Can you please tell me your thoughts on Agenda 21?  My friends are so distracted with the Charlie Sheen and Lindsey Lohan stories while popping their Prozac.  I am seeking the truth and wish to awake.  Thanks, Madison

Yes, there are 400 Marines but they're on amphibious assault ships off the Libyan coast and have been there for weeks.  The DoD positioned lots of assets off Libya to be sure they could quickly respond to whatever the President ordered. The only Marine boots on the ground have been the guys who landed an Osprey to rescue a downed pilot.  Search and rescue are always part of a no-fly plan and this was always foreseen.  Again today Obama re-iterated that no American troops would be landing in Libya.  
As for the other poster's link about friction among the allies, you're making much too big a deal out of it.  It's being ironed out and I doubt very much if we'll be heavily involved for a very long time.  Of course, we'll have to wait and see.  There is a legitimate reason  for  concern with a rather fuzzy mission and a very unclear situation on the ground in Libya.  But intervention of any kind isn't pretty.  Sitting by and watching Ghaddafi slaughter his people would have been worse.  So far, the complications have been far fewer than those in Iraq.
PS:  dumba_boy should win a prize  for "most appropriate alias."

-- Modified on 3/23/2011 3:00:31 PM

No one was killed.  There were a few shrapnel wounds.  Try not to keep bending the truth.
PS:  I don't need any "jingoistic thrills," I'll settle for the truth.  You might try it some time.

You think it's ok to wound and main innocents, as in "a few shrapnel wounds", just as long as we don't kill them?

as it is very hard to back pedal once you have been called out.

You didn't say you were glad they weren't killed, you said they weren't killed, only wounded.
No distortion, that's what you said.

Say what you mean, mean what you say, and stand by it.

But that seems to be what "lib-tards" do, open their mouths, then back track with "that's not what I meant" or "you're distorting what I said" when called out.

Explain it? You see, he can't or won't!

I'll explain it!

It's just a gutless alias racheting up the rhetoric we heard during the eight years of the Bush administration, against those who criticized then President Bush. Then, when one criticized President Bush, his administration, or his policies, they were called "unpatriotic," because we were a country at war. Well, things seem to have changed under President Obama's administration, though we are still at war, and those who called critics of President Bush "unpatriotic" feel free to call liberals traitors.

Ya see! It's really quite simple!

I never said I was pleased anyone was wounded.  I simply corrected the poster who said they were killed.  I'd say there's a big difference between being wounded or being dead but perhaps the distinction is lost on you.  More evidence that your alias is well chosen, dumba.

On the morning news after the first strike I heard/saw reported on the BooB Tube B2 bombers drop (40) 2000LB bombs on military base and that over 100 cruise missles strikes had been made from sea.

Subsequently Pentagon officials were stated as reporting: NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO CIVILIAN casualties. Now that's what I call SMART munitions.

In just about any recent war (past century) civilian to combant deaths are around 10 to 1.

And the beat goes on.....

Help me Mr. Wizard.

-- Modified on 3/24/2011 8:29:08 AM

OH......slaughter...

As in the hundreds of thousands of Iraqi and Afghan citizens who after hearing of Patrich Henry said "sure no problem".

It's easy to rationize aggression when your on the higher moral ground, yes?

Just the facts son just the facts.....LOL

Apparantly you still don't see the difference.  All I did was point out a simple factual error in a post, which the OP has yet to dispute.  You're the one who missed the point.  And, yes, you did distort what I said.  I leave it to others to decide who's right here, as you are clearly unreachable.  But thanks for continuing to confirm the appropriateness of your alias.  God, I hope you're not planning on going to med school after you get your GED.

-- Modified on 3/24/2011 1:41:59 PM