The bull in the china shop seems to be unconcerned about the possibility that his increasingly aggressive stance towards Iran might lead us into Iraq, Act II.  The situation is quite complicated over there and I am not going to try to summarize it here.  But so much of baby Bush's tactics seem uncomfortably close to the build up to the war in Iraq that I can't help wondering whether his megalomania has finally run away with him.

Let's face it: the best insurance that Bushy boy has is that Dickey-poo Cheney is the Vice President (a peculiarly fitting title for him, methinks.)

The irresponsibility of POTUS Bush and his "policies" is simply breaktaking.

Not content to quit when he's behind, he thrashes about and flails around, boundless energy devoid of all thought, like a destructivee force of nature and guarantees that he, and we, fall even further behind.

I'm not too sure about the "accidental" part.  Both sides seem eager to continue to ratchet up the rhetoric, and the thought is father to the deed, so...

Personally, I'm counting down to 012009, 12 Noon EST, when the body politic is at last free of this lingering, debilitating sickness [figuratively speaking, of course] we known as The Bush Administration.  Or is it Maladministration?

Preserve, Protect and Defend The Constitution?

Take care that the laws be faithfully executed?

We're at some pass here -- I'm counting on the Iranians to be moderate and circumspect and to take a step away from the brink.   Just great, just great.

It is not necessary or productive to fly into a state of hysteria every time some dipshit reporter pontificates about something in order to continue to get paid for being a professional misleader and misinformer.

You think getting drunk or stoned is the way to deal with world problems, eh?  Unfortunately, name calling and self-important rants are no substitute for informed rebuttal.  But then, you apparently are unable to provide any rebuttal except the same old, tired, empty rhetoric.  I guess that makes you a good Republican.

I am certainly not going to jump on the libbie hysteria bandwagon every time some dimwit pinko says something "could" happen in order to meet their daily writing quote for a rag publication.

Read the Project For A New American Century's defense assessment from Sept 2000 which was written by the same people who masterminded the current SNAFU. The goal all along was to start with Iraq and use that toehold to move against Iran and Syria.

It's time to face the music. The people hwo pull the strings in the Bush administration do no have the best interests of the U.S. in mind.

it in no way goes to the relative truth or falsity of the journalists' opinions.

I'm assuming that you DO NOT suck donkey dew, and look at the various musings you offer up here on the Board.

See what I mean?