Write Review
1,980,536 Total Reviews 3,628 New Reviews
7,734 Users Online

Politics and Religion

Yep! And, Newt wasn't just going to the library to study, but to....
mattradd 40 Reviews 1623 reads
posted

boink the head librarian!  ;)

Priapus534236 reads

Person that runs this website is Erick Erickson, hardcore Tea Party activist & CNN political analyst. Sounds more like he's working for the DNC.

Looks like a chance that Mitt could win Fla ( according to most recent polling ) get the nomination & give BHO a run for his $. But many
conservative writers/pundits think Newt/Mitt fracas is ruining it for election & STILL clamor for a new candidate.

Sounds like the GOP needs a morale director; or, perhaps, a better POTUS candidate.



-- Modified on 1/26/2012 7:01:52 AM

Related Link: http://www.redstate.com/erick/2012/01/24/were-fighting-over-two-guys-and-neither-side-t...

ReplyQuoteReport
PitchingWedge948 reads

This has been obvious for months. And the power of the incumbency is even greater than the power that the buffet line holds over you . . . . .

ReplyQuoteReport
Priapus532114 reads

As you know, I carefully monitor polls ( some might say to nauseatng degree ) & consider myself a "political realist".

Obama is QUITE vunerable for several reasons : he has a 46% approval rating, "economic recovery is shaky" & Romney trails BHO by razor thin 1.9%
& is GOP candidate who polls best among independents.

With Romney having that good a shot, I'm really quite amazed how demoralized how many in GOP ( including yourself ) are.

I would guess it's because many in GOP distrust/dislike Romney & have no confidence in him as candidate. I have to say it's damned puzzling.

ReplyQuoteReport
PitchingWedge1697 reads

He has his faults but so does everyone else.

I think he would make a fine President and would be far, far better than the man in office right now.

I'm simply looking at the facts.  Incumbent Presidents seldom lose.  Bush 41 did in 1992 but the economy took its hit right in the middle of the campaign and not a couple of years earlier like it has for Obama.  That gave Obama plenty of time to deflect the hits, blame his predecessor and wait for any marginal upturn he could get in the economy.

Carter lost but even a Ronal Reagan critic like you would have to admit that Reagan was a superior candidate and a larger-than-life personality.  And the hostage crisis and high mortgage rages were things that Carter could not overcome.

Ford really doesn't count because he was never elected and was in office for only a couple of years.

Before that, you have to go back to pre-WW II to find an incumbent losing.

And Bush 43 was certainly beatable in 2004 but the Dems were unable to do it. Despite the unpopular wars and the mass hatred that liberals had for Bush over his defeat of Gore in the 2000 election.

Look at the polls all you want. I feel more comfortable looking at history.

ReplyQuoteReport
Priapus531300 reads

in '80, couldn't bear to vote for him or RR, so I voted for Anderson. In '84, given terrible choice of RR or Mondale, I voted that year, but not for the Presidency.

Beginning of my long slide away from the Dems to become an independent.

ReplyQuoteReport
MSHSEX1472 reads

Speaking of Independents, I'm surprised that an Independent hasn't made a competitive run for the White House as of late. You'd think the time would be right for the Indie party to shine and blame both the Republicans and Democrats for the US's current predicaments.

Posted By: Priapus53
in '80, couldn't bear to vote for him or RR, so I voted for Anderson. In '84, given terrible choice of RR or Mondale, I voted that year, but not for the Presidency.

Beginning of my long slide away from the Dems to become an independent.

ReplyQuoteReport
MSHSEX1033 reads

That is one of the funniest cartoons I've ever seen.

But to be fair, Mitt was never a businessman but more of an investor (which is how he made the vast majority of his fortune).

Posted By: Priapus53
Person that runs this website is Erick Erickson, hardcore Tea Party activist & CNN political analyst. Sounds more like he's working for the DNC.

Looks like a chance that Mitt could win Fla ( according to most recent polling ) get the nomination & give BHO a run for his $. But many
conservative writers/pundits think Newt/Mitt fracas is ruining it for election & STILL clamor for a new candidate.

Sounds like the GOP needs a morale director; or, perhaps, a better POTUS candidate.



-- Modified on 1/26/2012 7:01:52 AM

ReplyQuoteReport
mattradd1624 reads

boink the head librarian!  ;)

ReplyQuoteReport
MSHSEX1363 reads

While he was in an open marriage with the school prinicpal ROFLMFAO!

Posted By: mattradd
boink the head librarian!  ;)

ReplyQuoteReport
inicky463500 reads

But find it sad he's pining for some "deus ex machina" consensus candidate to materialize and save the party.  Who?  From where?  There ain't anybody.  I still say Romney, despite his baggage, is the only one with a chance to beat Obama, because he'll appeal to the independents and that's where elections are won.  His Achilles heel is if evangelicals and Tea Partiers stay home because of his moderate record and Mormon faith.

ReplyQuoteReport
Priapus531226 reads

Dayum, icky-------thought I was only one on board who knew that-----man-----you're almost as smart as me------;)-------LMFAO !

ReplyQuoteReport
inicky461919 reads

here's a defintion.
"The Latin phrase deus ex machina comes to English usage from Horace's Ars Poetica, where he instructs poets that they must never resort to a god from the machine to solve their plots. He refers to the conventions of Greek tragedy, where a crane (mekhane) was used to lower actors playing gods onto the stage. The machine referred to in the phrase could be either the crane employed in the task, a calque from the Greek "god from the machine" ("ἀπὸ μηχανῆς θεός," apò mēkhanḗs theós), or the riser that brought a god up from a trap door. The idea is that the device of said god is entirely artificial or conceived by man."
As a student of Elizabethan and Jacobean drama, I've seen the device used quite often.  Like many conventions, it was adopted from Roman theater.  The sonnet form was also adopted from Roman literature.

ReplyQuoteReport
NeedleDicktheBugFucker2617 reads

Wtf?

Posted By: inicky46
here's a defintion.
"The Latin phrase deus ex machina comes to English usage from Horace's Ars Poetica, where he instructs poets that they must never resort to a god from the machine to solve their plots. He refers to the conventions of Greek tragedy, where a crane (mekhane) was used to lower actors playing gods onto the stage. The machine referred to in the phrase could be either the crane employed in the task, a calque from the Greek "god from the machine" ("ἀπὸ μηχανῆς θεός," apò mēkhanḗs theós), or the riser that brought a god up from a trap door. The idea is that the device of said god is entirely artificial or conceived by man."
As a student of Elizabethan and Jacobean drama, I've seen the device used quite often.  Like many conventions, it was adopted from Roman theater.  The sonnet form was also adopted from Roman literature.

ReplyQuoteReport
inicky461447 reads

Shit, man, where do you think you are, on a fuck-board or something?  I guess I should post on the literary board here, but I doubt it's as much fun.  LOL!

ReplyQuoteReport
Priapus531357 reads

ReplyQuoteReport
PitchingWedge1672 reads

that explains his disdain for Romney.

From what I heard of an interview with him the other night, he will stubbornly give in and support Gingrich if Newt gets the nom but I doubt he will ever support Romney.


But who cares.  He is one guy and carries no influence.  Kinda like all the rest of us . . . . .

ReplyQuoteReport
nuguy461453 reads

if obama is re-elected......the welfare president is the wrong guy at the wrong time..a jimmy carter clone....only worse.....let's all picket sunday at the church of GD America!

ReplyQuoteReport
Post Reply Back To Forum
Register Now!