Politics and Religion

Video of Powell and Rice in early 01 ADMITTING Saddam had no WMD!!
emeraldvodka 2882 reads
posted


 A video of Rice and Powell admitting in early 01 that Saddam was not a threat to his neighbors, had no WMD capability, and was wholly contained!!
 It's hilarious because if Kerry had balls(or even one left nut) this video of Rice and Powell would have been the only commercial he needed to run the entire campaign to discredit these liars.  
Truly, truly pathetic.  
 
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article6456.htm

emeraldvodka3146 reads


  Somebody has to have something to say about it!!  Doesn't amaze anyone that in 01 the head of the NSC and Sate say Saddam is no threat and all the sudden he becomes a such a big threat to the world and the US that we invade Iraq.  
  Either Powell and Rice are lying on the video, or they were lying afterward when they started to claim he was a threat.  Sure would like to ask them both under oath which was the case!!  
  Now had Powell gotten a blowjob, or had Rice given one to somebody then there would have been a real scandal!!  What was I thinking??

That would be if Powell GAVE a blowjob.

there really isn't much to say, is there?  Anybody with half a brain knew they were all lying about Iraq after 9/11, and anybody who really read the news objectively knew that the UN inspectors had been very effective all along.  What's way more disturbing is how the U.S. press has played along with the Administration for four years.  I don't get it.  Or perhaps they are afraid they'll have their White House press passes revoked.

Musical Joke2341 reads

It might sound difficult to believe, but there's an off-chance that Powell and Rice were sincere about what they said when they said each comment they made.  And that's the problem with using bad intelligence.  It might sound scary to imagine that politicians believe what they are saying, but one is safer to assume sincerity than to assume a lack thereof.

Imagine if members of the Bush administration were debauched...  Would it make any difference among Bush detractors?  Nope.  Those who hate the Bush administration would still hate it, and those who idolize his administration would probably not believe anything bad said about his cabinet.  Likewise, the Monica Lewinsky scandal got press because radical Republicans were fishing for something, anything, to impeach President Clinton over.  And they finally found a flimsy case that has hurt the nation.  (If Clinton had been impeached over letting missile technology go to China in exchange for campaign contributions, I would have supported that.  It's too bad that Republican fishing expeditions obscured some real criminal activity.)

It seems to me that we live in a political culture where it is standard to assume insincerity from one's opponents and enemies.  And that's too bad, because it is not only rude to assume insincerity from people who are sincere, but it is dangerous as well.

the calculus changed after 9/11.  'Course, perhaps Kerry wasn't as smart as you guys on the Left tried to suggest.

emeraldvodka1610 reads


And since Im a conservative, I don't fall into the Kerry camp either.  The fact is Bush wanted Saddam removed from the time he came to the WH and 9/11 was just an excuse.  A means to an end.  Had W gone after Iran or N. Korea I would have wholeheartedly supported him.  But he had a hard on for Saddam from day one and used 9/11 to stick that hard on up saddam's ass.

Register Now!