Maybe not by getting shot at, but they certainly "served their country".
Military service is far from the only way to serve your country. BTW I am a veteran myself, I just don't see that as a unique badge of honor, millions served before me, millions more after me. It doesn't make any of us better people for having done so. It just "is".
and I am the only one who is sick and fucking tired of hearing every swinging dick (and vagina) that enters the military being referred to as "heroes"? Military service doesn't make you a fucking hero. It doesn't make you a "baby killeer" like the soldiers of my time were referred to , but it doesn't make you a hero either.
Went back to the beginning of Nov. and did Not see a post on W, did I miss it. Pres. Bush was on Oprah last week, said he approved water boarding as he wrote it in his new Book that he pushed it,not just went along. Saw a clip from the Rachel Maddow show where John Stewart says, W is technically a War Criminal. Reminds me of a recent film, "Ghost Writer". Right now the Military & Justice Dept. will prosecute anyone who is guilty of water boarding. Also, after WWII the US War Crimes Commission hanged Japanese & German who water boarded & sentenced others to long prison terms. Think about it.
Bush wrote it in his book and he said so on an interview promoting his book.
You can't pin this one on John.
You can't pin this one on John.
The US under CAT specifically required that a specific intent be found to support a finding of torture.
-- Modified on 11/15/2010 5:49:02 PM
It worked too, didn't it. KSM fessed up. He was not talking until that happened.
W said KSM said WB allowed him to waiver his vow to Isalm .
KSM said that he had to resist interrogation only up to a certain point. Waterboarding was the technique that allowed him to reach that point and allowed him to talk .
badly misinformed. Here is the deal, enemies are working everyday to cause harm to us. If waterboarding is necessary to obtain information to protect us from attack, then so be it. The Bush administration efforts were focused on finding and preventing attacks from Afghanistan to the Phillipines rather than waiting for the evil-doers to show up at a US airport. JerseyFlyer has right, because this methodology worked.
It's either waterboarding and aggressive rules of engagement or having to submit to ridiculous airport pat-downs. Secretary of Homeland Security NaplitalaNO is an idiot.
I can't believe anyone at this point would think torture is a lofty idea, but apparently there's still a few dim bulbs among us.
Lastly, I'll say that the 8th amendment of the US Constitution states:
"Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted."
Note that there's no qualifiers there for this to apply only to US citizens. This protection applies to everyone. The Founders knew that a gov't that could torture it's "enemies" could also torture it's critics, or even it's citizens. Therefore, the support of torture is fundamentally UnAmerican, and demonstrates your hatred of the principles this country was founded upon.
Might I suggest you move to a nation whose principles are more in tune with your own, Breaker. I hear they still boil people alive in Uzbekistan.
-- Modified on 11/15/2010 8:09:13 PM
not about bankers or alcoholic consumption. We were discussing Waterboarding as a tactic to combat terrorism. I say hell ya.......waterboard, waterboard. Waterboarding is neither torture nor illegal, nor is the same as boiling people.
To combat terrorism you can either use law enforcement techniques which have proven ineffective or attack terrorism using military tactics. The choice is clear and the rules of engagement are different. In combat if the enemy is pointing a weapon at me or my buddies, I shoot to kill. I don't stop and yell to the enemy and inform them of their constitutional rights.
What you fail to understand in the safe confines of your cubicle is that we are at war. Wake up! While we are in the subject on the war on the Terrorism; how is President Obama doing in deactivating Guantanamo? Yea I thought so.
By the way I swore to protect and preserve the United States Constitution not Uzbekistan's.
We've moved on to a military and diplomatic effort against terrorists.
Waterboarding isn't torture and isn't illegal? Is that why we prosecuted the Japanese for doing it?
As Israel has yet to realize, but their entire history demonstrates, using military tactics against terrorists is ineffective. The same was demonstrated in the UK's fight with the IRA.
Law enforcement and intelligence operations are marginally more effective, but as the UK/IRA situation demonstrated, a far more effective strategy is to use negotiation. This forces the terrorists to give up violence and move to resolving disputes politically.
In combat, if directly threatened you should shoot to kill. However, I doubt someone tied down to a board could literally or metaphorically point a gun at anyone.
If you swore to protect and preserve the US Constitution, then perhaps you shouldn't wipe your ass with it.