She has been on a 3-day rant about how bad conditions are at the border detention center, but just days before going there, she and 97 other Dems voted AGAINST the $4 billion appropriation for more beds for the detainees.  A great commercial for 2020 would be photos of kids sleeping on the cold cement, and then on the beds provided by this bill, with an overlay listing the names of the 98 Dems that didn't want to come up with the money for the beds.  

Were you asleep last week during all the coverage of the war within the Democratic caucus over whether to support this bill?  AOC and other Progressives were against the McConnell-supported bill because, while it provided funding to care for the refugees, it required no accountability from DHS regarding other protections for them. They lost. Again, this was a week ago, so this is not news. Point being, they DID "want to come up with the money for the beds," but they also insisted controls be put on DHS and Immigration to make sure the overall treatment of the refugees improved.
And while it's legitimate to argue that their stance was foolish, your oversimplification of her stance just makes you look dumb.
I would have thought that a week ago you might have argued that this internecine combat among the Dems was foolish and weakened Pelosi. At least then you would have been right, instead of taking the simplistic position you did.

-- Modified on 7/4/2019 8:00:22 AM

Those lips would be much better served wrapped around my dick than any of the words that come out of them. PLUS it would have the added benefit of shutting her up for a while.

A positive spin on her vote against giving children beds.  Why does there have to be conditions?  Either you want to get children off the cold, concrete floor, or you don't.  It should be unconditional.  She's soulless.  

Anyone who's followed the behavior of Customs and Immigration down on the border knows they are permitting sub-human conditions down there -- and not simply due to lack of funds -- and need some requirements to make them use the money to actually take better care of the refugees.
But please report to your handlers in St. Petersburg that you are doing your very best to sow dissension here in the US.

-- Modified on 7/5/2019 1:47:34 PM

By those standards there are literally BILLIONS of people who could, and possibly will be claiming asylum here simply because life sucks in their own country.  

But do you know how stupid you sound?
Most of these people are from Central American countries like El Salvador and Honduras which have become incredibly dangerous and plagued with drug and gang violence. And your Emperor was stupid enough to cut off aid to these countries which was designed to assist in those problems and remove the incentive people have to leave anyway. So TRUMP has actually made the situation worse.
And your statement about "Other countries don't allow people by the millions to simply flood into their countries," is hilarious. What rock were you sleeping under the past few summers when refugees from the Middle East and Africa flooded into European countries like Germany?  By the hundreds of thousands. Of course, this is NOT a good thing, as Angela Merkel has realized too late and if you weren't so abysmally stupid it could have helped you make your point. So not only did you miss an opportunity, you also said something ponderously dumb and also totally WRONG. You WIN.....today's Daily Double of DUMB.
As for Canada, they are so tough they've accepted loads of refugees from the Mid East and Africa that we refused. So you are WRONG again.
This really was a paroxsym of stupidity on your part, Wu. You are usually stupid, of course. But even for you, this was unusually dense.

the same "conditions" that were set up by the Obama administration, who built the chain-link holding cells and initiated the policy of separating children from adults until parentage can be determined in order to thwart human trafficking of children.  Why was it such a progressive idea when Obama did it, and such a sub-human condition now?  Do you think it has to do with politics?  Are the Dems being a little disingenuous on this one?  

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/06/23/trump-falsely-says-obama-started-family-separation/1540733001/
Trump defends conditions for detained migrant kids, blames Obama for family separations; fact checkers call foul
.
"But, according to FactCheck.org, "previous administrations did not have a blanket policy to prosecute parents and separate them from their children." It was after the Trump administration announced its "zero-tolerance" immigration policy in April 2018, in which everyone who illegally entered the U.S. was referred for criminal prosecution, that thousands of migrant children were separated from their parents."
.
"PolitiFact found that family separations were rare during the Obama and Bush administrations and became "systematic" under Trump's zero-tolerance policy."

The entire narrative about Obama being the one to separate families at the border has long since been proven to be a lie.
What makes you repeat it? Is it simply that you are desperate to believe it? Or will you say something you know is untrue because it suits your argument? Read on....

when they first showed news footage of the "cages" for children while bashing Trump, only to find out after the fact that the footage was shot in 2014 when Obama was president.  Go ahead and fact-check it.  Include the link.  

Clearly you never even read the link I already supplied proving your post was WRONG. Please remain in denial.

-- Modified on 7/8/2019 12:54:16 PM

On Obama's Immigration tactics going back to 2011.  It even quotes the LA Times, not exactly a conservative publication by any stretch of the imagination.  

I don't do that so I didn't read it. You still didn't say if you read mine.

cookies are virtually useless when you are accessing from a VPN.  The VPN protects your privacy.  

You replied about a cookie problem but you did not reply to the above comment that quoted your own link about the Obama vs Trump policies:  "To be clear: the Obama administration’s use of ATEP was not intended to break-up families – that was an OCCASIONALLY expected side effect – while Trump’s recently [April 2018] -confirmed policy is expressly directed toward that end in the name of “deterrence.”"

His position on that MORE recently.  April 2018 is not that recent.  Try to keep up.  It probably wasn't reported on CNN, so its understandable that you're behind.  

http://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/trump-s-family-separation-policy-never-really-ended-why-ncna1025376
"Trump's family separation policy never really ended. This is why.
At least 700 more families have been separated since the administration said it was ending its inhumane policy.
President Donald Trump signed an executive order last June ostensibly ending zero tolerance and family separations at the border and promising to reunite almost 3,000 children with their parents. Yet relying largely on a technical exception, at least 700 more families have been separated since then, and at least five children have died."

Reports say the ICE is about to start raids to arrest and deport more illegals.  And since some of them have kids who are US citizens, more kids will be separated from their parents. The purpose is to scare the crap out of anyone trying to seek asylum here.

We have been deporting illegal aliens since well before ICE even existed. INS routinely conducted raids as far back as I can remember, I remember learning what a search warrant was at about the age of five when INS would show up every month or so to my uncle's farm to round up all the wetbacks and chinks who had "jumped ship"  

As you say, its probably just a rumor to try to curb the flow of illegals into this country.  However, under Obama, they had a similar announcement, and ICE did some isolated raids (we had one in SoCal) where they rounded up 20-30 people, and that DID have a chilling effect on the illegal migrant flow for a few months, but by not repeating the raids, things went back to normal after awhile.  

There have been raids for DECADES,enforcing our laws is not what's new, NOT enforcing our laws is what is new, not deporting illegals for the very good reason that they are illegal. What's the sense in even having laws, borders etc if we aren't going to enforce them?

run by Dems.  There was a story on local LA news last night that showed Governor Newsome talking about giving Medicaid coverage to ALL illegals.  Then the camera switched to scenes of homeless people living on the sidewalks of LA and SF, piles of shit where they relieve themselves, and then scenes of businesses and residents planting cactus and other thorny plants around the perimeters of their businesses to keep the homeless from moving onto their property.  Even arch-Lib Cher has been screening at the Dem controlled government lately to keep the illegals out until they take care of the homeless problem.  For the record, this is the ONLY time I have ever agreed with Cher politically.

It tried to keep Chinks out of this country until 1943. It was enforced but it FAILED because there are ALWAYS loopholes. Read on, from Brittanica.com:
"Some Chinese simply evaded the laws altogether by immigrating illegally. In fact, the phenomenon of illegal immigration became one of the most significant legacies of the Chinese-exclusion era in the United States. Despite the disproportionate time and resources spent by U.S. immigration officials to control Chinese immigration, many Chinese migrated across the borders from Canada and Mexico or used fraudulent identities to enter the country. A common strategy was that of the so-called “paper son” system, in which young Chinese males attempted to enter the United States with purchased identity papers for fictional sons of U.S. citizens (people of Chinese descent who had falsely established the identities of those “sons”)."

the train, you should thank the Chinese guy sitting nearby who's ancestors built most of the early  railroad system near the end of the 19th century.  They were hard workers.  How many of them ended up needing government support?  Its apples and oranges.  You can't compare the past Chinese immigrants, some of whom MAY have come here illegally, to the hoards of illegal mooches that are flooding our boarders today..

Nobody whined that the illegals of any color should be above the law and not deported when caught. I remember a LOT of Chinese being deported all the way up to the 70's. I didn't have to read about it, INS would round them up right in front of me.

The Irish built the railroads in the East, not the Chinks.

The Chinese were not on the Eastern Seaboard.  My mistake.  

Yeah, have you seen the teeth behind those lips ....ouch

AOC reminds me of Janice Griffith and JG reminds me of AOC. I'd love to do either or both.  
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/porn-stars-23/ps---celeb-doppelgangers-193258?page=1

She doesn't have the "Bug Eyes" that AOC has. That makes it VERY easy to tell the two apart in the pics you posts a few months ago.

I’m not sure what you consider a pussy hound but no doubt I get more pussy in a week than that miserable little wretch, LTM, does in a year.