I don't care whether your're a Democrat, Republican, Independent, this is deplorable....Offers of financial aid & supplies was either not accepted or significantly delayed....

This is shameful & is just another colossal blunder of this administration..

The previous has been a public service message brought to you by the corrupt forces of the right wing sleight of hand Swift Boat Vermins for Lies, Damned Lies, and Outright Misdirection.

With funds paid for by your tax dollars and insidiously funneledto special interest groups via the Karl Rove Underground Sleazeway.

And yet, mindless idiots like the ones in this forum who CONTINUE to echo the talking points of an exceedingly ultra-Fascist right wing faction are precisely the reason why the criminal Bush administration continues to get away with murder.

Amazingly, the entire episode reminds me of Abraham Lincoln.

They fooled all of the people for some time. They continue to fool some people all of the time.

Fool us once shame on you. Fool us twi.... you can't fool us again.

A typical response from airhead Righti

Good luck trying to talk sense into empty heads!!! Usually there are brain in one head-In their case, they have manure in their head instead.



-- Modified on 4/29/2007 11:46:27 AM

what is PAINFULLY lacking on this board is a neutral even handed review of the past two POTUS's handling of the Terrorist threats against this country.  Clearly the attacks are escalating and we sit and either do nothing (Clinton) or we do the totally wrong thing (BUSH 43).  

In Iraq we are doing what I have feared that we would do, and that is unite the Muslim world in their hatred for the US.  Way to go BUSH.  but why was he empowered to so do?  was it only 9-11?  I would say no, I would say the the inept 8 years of Clinton's do nothing policy was also a contributing factor.  So, for all those who say that 9-11 was a governmental conspiracy, I would say - maybe, just not as direct as one might suspect.  When Clinton had the ability to take Bin Laden out, and didn't, well that contributed.

believe everything that Sean Hannity says, you will always remain stupid.

admits that he failed to take out bin Laden when he had the chance.  So - hannity -  no, but I do listen to clinton.

Under Clinton, at least three opportunities to have Bin Laden handed over to the U.S. were rejected inexplicably.

According to the Sunday Times of London, Clinton himself said his refusal to accept the offer to hand over Bin Laden was the "Biggest Mistake" of his presidency.

Dude, Clinton himself admits it!  Get a grip.  I am not saying that bush is innocent, but neither is clinton.  what is YOUR problem?!  Asswipe.

with the money he saved stripping down our military to the bone.

he had the foresight to know the world was a safer place now that bin laden had his own counrty in afganastan

clifton never did anything wrong
just ask the guys here that wack off to his picture

Are you like 12 or just retarded?

The Associated Press, The Washington Times, and the L.A. Times) are right wing organs?!  - at least they provide their sources.... but hey, us retarded folks like to know that some provide their sources and check them out, unlike the ilk of Dan "kenneth, what's the frequency" Rather

Sources:

The Heritage Foundation, "AFTER WORLD TRADE CENTER BOMBING, U.S. NEEDS STRONGER ANTI-TERRORISM POLICY,"
The Jewish World Review, "Clinton's priority: Political correctness over fighting terror,"
The Jewish World Review, "Clinton's failure to mobilize America to confront foreign terror after the 1993 attack led directly to 9-11 disaster,"
Newsmax, "Clinton Paid 'Lip Service' to Terror Attacks, Expert Charges,"
Human Events, "Gore's 'Ill-Considered' Somalia Story,"
Townhall.com, "Clinton's legacy,"
Accuracy In Media, "Catastrophic Intelligence Failure,"
Newsmax, "Morris: Clinton Was Oblivious to Khobar Towers Terror Alert,"
Judicial Watch, "Why Was Clinton Soft on Terrorism?,"
MSNBC, "US State Dept. blocked FBI-Sudan cooperation on embassy bombings,"
Insight Magazine, "Clinton Connection Causes Quandary,"
The Associated Press, "Analyst: terrorism warning ignored,"
The Washington Post, "Intelligence Failure? Let's Go Back to Sudan,"  
Accuracy In Media, "CLINTON'S "BIGGEST MISTAKE,"'
The Associated Press, "Clinton rejected military strike on bin Laden"
The National Review, "Another Clinton Tale? Did he really come close to taking out Osama Bin Laden?,"
The Washington Times, "Clinton White House axed terror-fund probe,"
World Net Daily, "Was Clinton pro-Taliban? Congressman charges Afghan extremists were coddled, oversight efforts 'belittled,'"
World Net Daily, "Did Clinton nod to Mubarak overthrow? Book suggests foreign policy goof led to Luxor terror massacre,"
Newsmax, "CIA Sources: Clinton Administration 'didn't want' Bin Laden Arrested,"  
World Net Daily, "Pentagon suspects Osama bin Laden - Officials anxious to take terrorist out, after Clinton let him 'grow in strength'"
L.A. Times, "Clinton Let Bin Laden Slip Away and Metastasize,"
Newsmax, "Clinton Paid 'Lip Service' to Terror Attacks, Expert Charges,"
U.K. Guardian, "Milosevic: Bin Laden was in Albania,"
Newsmax, "Agents: Clinton-Reno DOJ Nixed FBI Terrorist Probe"
Newsmax, "Clinton Briefing on '98 WTC Hijack Plot to Stay Secret"


-- Modified on 5/1/2007 10:30:23 AM

-- Modified on 5/1/2007 10:31:29 AM

-- Modified on 5/1/2007 10:43:57 AM

You are way stupid. Most of those sources like Heritage, Mooney Times, World Nut Daily, Townhall, Newsmax, etc. are right wing rags. On top of that most of these look like opinion pieces, not reporting. After all Charles Krauthammer is published in the Washington Post. Is he liberal?

By the way, the fact that you think that the Washington Times is not biased proves that you are stupid.

they represent both sides.  get it?  Both sides.

As far as being mostly editorial, yes they are mostly editorial, but unlike most of the liberal gibberish, at least this has the guts to post sources... and uncover the potential for bias.  You doin that?! nope. cause that would expose you!

be dumb enough to think that a bunch of right wing editorials from different sources constitutes balance.