Again the NYT and the msm proven to be liars.

It's only been two months since this fact has been made public, so I am glad to see the "Old Gray and Senile Lady" keeps right on top of her corrections.

I can always tell when you've lost your objectivity on a subject!

You go into your four year old 'potty-mouth' mode!

Everyone that has kept repeating this "17 intelligence community" meme obviously has no idea what they are talking about.  
Please do some research for yourself and try and think for yourself.  
Included in this 17 number are several offices that are generally just names at the top of the org chart. The Office of the Director of National Intelligence.  This is the "Boss"  The office does not gather or analyze any intelligence at all.
Another is the Defense Intelligence Agency.  Each military service has their own intelligence agency.  Think about it, what would the Navy, Army, Marines, Coast Guard or Air Force intelligence agency have to do with Russian civilians and US officials?  They have their own jobs to do and no budget or resources to go outside the scope of their charter.
A few more of those agencies are the National Reconnaissance Office. They take pictures. The DEA. They focus on drug cartels. There are more, with their own little piece of the world of intelligence.  
Get the picture?    
(Yes, I know what I'm talking about. I worked for one of those agencies)

libs lie cuz the truth exposes their nonsense and  

Even within the 3 actual agencies that did participate, the conclusions were not made by the top of each agency but instead was the product of a handful of analysts, handpicked by Klapper. And even those conclusions were not equal. Two of the three (CIA and NSA) were not as conclusive as the FBI. And regarding the FBI, the fact that the DNC refused to allow their server to be examined by anyone but a private company that the DNC selected is just now coming out with more force.

-- Modified on 7/1/2017 2:21:32 PM

How it takes the Slimes 2 months to correct a "story" is stunning,  

Come on Jack! We both know this isn't about honest or credibility!

Bottom-line, you started your screen, attacking CNN, by referencing an opinion piece from the Hill. You and it had some legitimates points, but you oversold the significance of them. What really came through is, the underlying, essential stimulus for your rant is, you don't like them because they appear to beating up on 'your boy.' I've got no problem with your perception, particular when there is evidence supporting it. Just own it, and don't oversell your legitimate points. Those times when CNN failed journalistic standards, should never have happened. But, what you and other righties typically fail to point out is, CNN did take corrective action. And, yes, I am hoping they learn from their mistakes!

Matt is my “little Chihuahua”?

Would that have killed you? You had, and continue to have, many posts in that thread. Why the reticence to acknowledge those "legitimate points" at the time? You arguing all this to death, when YOU AGREED WITH ME on some points, just make you look silly.

It IS relevant that Hilary went out there with the "17 agency" lie. There was NO need for her to exaggerate it. The three would have been good enough, but no, she couldn't contain herself and the lib media ate crickets.

Hillary had no where else to go. she had to lie, in fact she always lies. She had nothing to lose and went the way of a pathetic washed up loser politician who will be making her next speech in front of a judge telling him why she does not deserve to go to jail.

Judy Miller swallowed the Bush Admin's bullshit about Iraq's WMD program.  You know, Jackie, the one that didn't exist? Miller (and the Times) blew it so badly she got fired and now exists mainly as an "expert" commentator for Faux News. You know, that channel with the uber-high journalistic standards.

That people believe "lies"?

People believe lies that support their interests.  It's not either, or. Why is that so hard for you to understand?
I don't question your intelligence because I know you have none.
Please start wearing a bib.

IOW, you had to go back, what, 15 years or so to find a lib media mistake that benefitted an R president? How many can you point to in the Trump era? Any at all? And if by chance there was one or two, how would they compare to the dozens, or possibly hundreds, of reports from the lib MSM that have been debunked as completely false??

I'm working very hard to take them off!

And that was just the easiest of your many mistakes, Jack.  
1) I didn't have to go back 15 years, that was just the most egregious Times mistake in favor of the right that I recalled.
2) As for mistakes that benefit Trump, it's impossible to find any because Trump is such a self-destructive fuck-up. That's not the Times' fault.
3) Quote as many Reps and Dems as you want, they were ALL WRONG.
So glad you want to associate yourself with all those Dems who were WRONG.
Fair and balanced! That's YOU Jack!

you don't acknowledge it when I do, or it's not enough to satisfy you, so why waste my time?

And not to look foolish or petty for two more. You admitted you agreed with several of my points eventually, so this is all just an exercise in childish silliness on your part.

Too late! You've already taken the stage looking foolish and petty!

I'm not the one who failed to put his big boy britches on, and have a cryfest about how evil and corrupt CNN is, or any news outlet for that matter, I have my ways of working around poor journalism that's more mature than yours!

You said Judy Miller, believed Bush admin lies about WMD.

That would be YOU...you seems to enjoy posting quotes and articles from the biggest fake news outlets on a regular basis......CNN, MSNBC, WAPO and NYTimes.

Your last post was complete word salad.  Unintelligible.

Only the FBI and the CIA reported a high level of confidence. The NSA rated their level of confidence as moderate. The only choices are low, moderate or high.

Still straining at gnats, I see!

Bottom line: I don't see many, if any, intelligence officials jumping up and down saying the Russians were not involved (camel).

Wanted the entire world to vote in US elections?

Everything I said is true as well. It's no surprise you can't admit it, but then again you are quite often not interested in reality.

Dang! Just double down on those gnats, why don't you?

But, you're wrong about me not being interested in reality. I do like to put it all in perspective! I can acknowledge there are gnats, but I'm not blind to the camels, and give them more weight!

It's not just your perception of reality that is flawed but you also lack a self-awareness and have an inability to recognize how you are embarrassing yourself. Could be your perceived gnats are starting to eat your brain.

the lefties have been shown as nothing but liars...so too their cohorts on the board....so eager to  punch Trump, they care not for accuracy, ethics, morality or just common decency. Looks like a group of Venezuela writers have infiltrated the USA.

I can't believe how moron Dem. Congresspersons such as Al Franken quoted it at being 17.  17 is the new 3.....in snow flake math.

You have a TOTAL lack of self-awareness.

I hate to break it to you, Ed, but you are not the arbitrator of truth and reality. So give it up. Just stating so doesn't make it true, other than inside of your own head!

You were just lecturing everyone on that yesterday. Hmmm.

his  claim that the “17 intelligence agencies” exaggeration is somehow a “big deal.”

Whenever someone at the level of Director of National Intelligence LIES in the middle of a Presidential election, specifically for the purpose of aiding one party then it's always a big deal, unless of course you agree with the hoped for outcome. To claim it had zero effect on anyone goes beyond all credulity (and actually beyond the point) and to think this was Clapper's and Brennan's only instance of meddling strains one's level of believability.  

who know when he'll be able to extricate himself!

I have no doubt that you personally believe it is a “big deal” but your post has been challenged on the basis that the technical misrepresentation and the Times delay in correction had no real world effect on conduct.

He's just shown you more proof that the liars are all on your side. Person, you really need to find a new passtime.

I'll be sure to stop in to say hello.

Posted By: mattradd

Re: lol! Now you've done it! You've sent him down the rabbit hole and,...
who know when he'll be able to extricate himself!

I already told why it was a big deal. The chief intelligence officer of the country fabricated a falsehood, almost certainly in an attempt to stop Trump. I understand your partisanship is trumping your patriotism at the moment. So sad that you actually appear to believe that a statement of “Two agencies believe it’s true and a third sort of believes it’s true” has the same effect and impact as saying that “ALL SEVENTEEN intelligence agencies believe it is true.”