129,000 jobs last month ( minimum needed is about 300,000), lowest labor participation rate ever, GDP for the first quarter just less than 1%, stagnant wages for the last 7 years, more people on government assistance than ever before; now that's a recovery! middle income wages lower than in 2009, 1% 'income' up from 2009.....

he Obama family is doing ok and so are his political enemies.

can you provide different data than what I stated? didn't see anything in your response that indicated my info was incorrect?  
(btw,u are better off than in '09? if yes, will you admit to being part of the 1%?)

But actually, it will only last until our currency collapses due to skyrocketing debt (8 trillion in 6 years, frightening).

The unemployment rate is down but the more important metric is the labor participation rate which is at 62.7%, is a 10 year low which is NOT a good thing AND the trend line is going in the wrong direction.  The Labor Participation Rate is a  much better tool for understanding how bad unemployment really is because the unemployment rate does not include people who have become discouraged and are out of the job market.  The participation rate reflects that many more people are out of work than any time in the last 10 years. Also keep in mind that the job creation rate is very low and almost 60% of the jobs being created are part time, partly due to Obama Care concerns and costs.  

Because someone told you?

Economy collapsed under his watch.

Yes facts are facts, but there is not necessarily any linkage.  I'd say the Fed policies have had a bigger impact than Obama on the economy.

That is the case with every POTUS Democrat or Republican. Being that said, POTUS can really fuck it up by not regulating markets as Bush did which led to the economic collapse.

According to FactCheck there is plenty of blame to go around, including Bill Clinton.  But yes the Bush Administration was in place when things crashed.  Whether another administration would have prevented the crash we will never know, but there were very few voices speaking up against the housing market, none of whom obviously caught the ear of either Congress or the administration.  Remember what Barney Frank said about Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac???

Another President with any sense of economics would not cut funding for SEC nor would they have given director level jobs to their cronies as Bush did.  

The Community Reinvestment Act, sign into law by Bill Clinton and supported overwhelmingly by Democrats, required banks to give loans to people who had no chance of paying them back. These loans were then sold off. This continued for a decade until there were no more buyers. There was nothing Bush could have done about this other than use taxpayer money to buy the loans. You could call this the Bailout. The idea that deregulation is in any way responsible for the crash in 2008 is nonsense. And the idea that that crash has permanently broken the economy, hence companies hesitant to invest 7 years later, is ludicrous.

.and after 6+ years of having a King rule, here is where we are (facts not opinion)....

for mis managing the economy.

Exactly where did I go wrong?

main reason being wing nuts think nations economy and personal finance are one and the same so they cannot comprehend economics, even at ECO 101 level.

ou spoke sense to the senseless.
You were logical to the illogical.
You were intelligent to the intellectually deficient.  
You were reasonable to the unreasonable.  

You just showed us all how well you comprehend economics.

another response with not an inkling of a factoid...so I ignore it