A potential pathway for Robert, Imp, BigPapasan, and Nicky?

He should have just improved it by erasing it.

She knows that DT is not remotely anti-war where Bibi Land is concerned.  In that case he's as pro-war as the ancient deity Mars.

Surprising that Yale let the study be published.

It might get her back on the right side.

"Wall Street" isn't "trying" to do ANYTHING. Wall Street isn't an entity with a brain (kinda like The SPOAT and Loser) and doesn't have an opinion on Trump's agenda. It is an uncoordinated community of investors simply reacting en masse to events. What the markets do is essentially create a valuation for shares based on the expected performance of the companies that issue the shares. It is, as ed pointed out earlier, it is a LEADING economic indicator that's trying to guess how a company will perform in the future by assigning a future-based multiple to its current earnings. That's what makes a stock's price.
But it's NOT a single entity that "tries" to do anything. It doesn't have a will, or intentions.
That BUS fails to understand this proves she has no clue about what's going on and simply wants to blame something for Trump's brainless blundering.

There was nothing "blue' about what I wrote. Just simple Economics 101, which Loser is too fucking dumb to comprehend..
Loser is one stupid mofo. Which means he'll be poor for the rest of his miserable life.

BUS is far from ignorant. While your description of stock valuation is clear and understandable, it doesn’t mean that a “Wall Street is scared/worried/optimistic/fill in the blank” statement does provide not an accurate analogy. You know that monolithic descriptions of “Wall Street” are common in the media and in the case of BUS’s description are meant to show the different priorities of the investing class and the working class.  

Over-simplifications and monolithic descriptions are, by definition, ignorant.

So the commentators on CNBC, Fox Business and Bloomberg are ignorant, in your eyes?

Now please prove that's what they are doing.

First, you said referring to Wall Street as an entity was ignorant. Now you’re saying that referring to Wall Street as an entity looking to short Trump’s agenda is ignorant. Which is it?

both things can be true at the same time?

Interesting essay at commonplace.org

how jacking up the price of goods by thousands of dollars helps the American worker and "Main St?"

A new Maserati’s going to go up thousands. A Rolex is going to go up thousands. Most Americans will see a slight increase in prices corresponding with an increase in productivity and wages.  

By explicitly accepting my high-end status.
And I will stipulate it's far too soon to know exactly by how much the tariffs will affect prices, because importers may simply eat some of the costs and not pass them on.
But estimates (which one would assume ChicKie has seen) are that the price of cars will go up by several thousand dollars; the price of flat-screen TVs by hundreds; and the same thing for appliances. Groceries (Trump's favorite word) will increase by a large percentage, too.
So it's not simply the rich (like me) who will be impacted.  
PS: there's one encouraging sign. Vietnam has said they'll drop their tariffs on US goods to zero if we'll do the same for theirs. If Trump is lucky, a negotiation will deliver a win. We'll see.