Politics and Religion

When you reference an article…
CENZO1 162 Reviews 28 reads
posted

…you best make sure you read it completely, especially if you start to make your own additions at the end. There was a significant discussion about Obama and what happened (or didn’t happen) during his eight years in office. But you excluded that, only focusing on Bush and Trump. Are you really so stupid as to think that people who read the complete article are going to miss that? Talk about checking hands, you might want to check out your brain function.

A great impartial interview.  
Afghanistan deserved better, says New Yorker staff writer Steve Coll. "We're a democracy," he says. "We decided to go over there and do this — and look what we've got."

My addition: So a republican president invaded the country, another deserted the country (or sold out the country to tyranny of Taliban) - and yeah, blame the democrat Biden for the whole cluster fuck that developed over two decades!
Yes, Biden botched the last mile - but the righty fuckers check your dirty hands first.

…you best make sure you read it completely, especially if you start to make your own additions at the end. There was a significant discussion about Obama and what happened (or didn’t happen) during his eight years in office. But you excluded that, only focusing on Bush and Trump. Are you really so stupid as to think that people who read the complete article are going to miss that? Talk about checking hands, you might want to check out your brain function.

If that war was EVER winnable, and it may or may not have been, it was after the first surge of troops Bush put in there. But then he pulled out tens of thousands and sent them to Iraq on the fake belief Saddam had nukes. By the time Obama's surge started it was too late, though no one knew it at the time.
What a waste.
And while getting out has been messier than it should have been, I'm still glade we'll be gone.

the Iranian General with a single drone shot to his vehicle that we have the technology to strike surgically without much collateral damage to civilians.  This war became MORE winnable as time passed, and I DO blame Trump for not pulling us out as winners instead of losers.  Trump certainly knew that Joe does not have the balls or mental capacity to pull this off, which has now been proven, at the expense of many innocent lives.  There will be many more innocent deaths in the coming months and years.  

 
The Taliban mission is to make sure that NO ONE in Afghanistan ever cooperates with the US again by using unrelenting brutality.  To borrow a saying from the brutal 19th century leader who united the Zulu nation under his sole leadership . . . . "Never leave an enemy alive, or he will rise up against you in the future."   I'm sure the coming genocide of the Afghanis who worked with us will be an example to the world that there is a price to pay for being pro-US, and we can thank Joe for giving the Taliban the opportunity to make this example.

Did you listen to it? It’s about 42 minutes and you posted within an hour - most likely you didn’t but bd that as it may, here are some pointers for you:
 I listened to the whole interview during driving.
I gave you access to the whole thing.
I declared what is clearly labeled as my addition.  
You take it or leave it! To me starting by Dubya and ending by selling out by Trumpolini are the important part!!!

The problem is you - particularly a fake balanced righty hack - and other righties cannot take an honest and unbiased report.

Now let me treat you like you treated me here: go fuck your self and start analyzing why self fucking is anatomically possible in your case - cause congenitally your little prick came inserted in your ass! Just saying... please check!

Once again you display your total ignorance. No, I didn’t listen to the report as you apparently did; rather I READ the article as posted. When one reads an article, one is not subjected to the pauses and breaks that go along with a broadcast interview. Thus it was possible for me to read the article in less than 42 minutes. You, however, would probably have a problem with that, especially since your comprehension skills seem to be at a remedial level. You talk of an honest and unbiased report and I have no problem with that. You, however, are the penultimate hypocrite in that you pick and choose only those parts of the interview/article that you are espousing, ignoring the parts you don’t like and then accuse others of not accepting the report. Do you ever really analyze your thoughts before posting?

And by the way, I don’t need to go and fuck myself. I’m getting plenty of ass. How about you? If you don’t remember you might check out the last dates of your TER reviews.

From his context he seems to think it means "beyond ultimate." In fact, it means second to last.
Poor STRONZO.

Thanks Nicky, always a pleasure to have you around, correcting people’s grammar and spelling. If I referred to you as the great “pontificator”, would that be appropriate? And remember, STRONZO has his eye on you.😈

I gave you access to both - written and voice!  
I added my take of the interview. Don’t you support my right to say whatever I want? I thought you fight for anybody’s right to ... you are the ultimate hypocrite!

Why is it my ignorance? Oh I get it - because you’re an ignorant and angry righty hack that can’t digest an impartial report blame me?

Talking about getting pussy ... I was listening to that interview on my drive back after I got some  ;) but then this is an anonymous board ... who knows what people are saying! Isn’t it smart pant?

Here is reply 2: Yes to your rhetoric. I do believe you righty hacks are stupids en made that you will miss it!  

How is that for an answer? You stupid cuck!

Register Now!