Politics and Religion

What's more important, we won't find MTP or NBC issuing their question towards the Left.
GaGambler 385 reads
posted
2 / 18

The WSJ said it would be very careful in ever using the word "lie" and I believe them, I don't recall them EVER calling out Obama for telling a "lie" although Barry told some whoppers

bigguy30 268 reads
posted
3 / 18

Also Trump is a liar and a con man too.
This is another reason why you voted for him.
Just like the rest of your cult members.
So the WSJ has the courage to call it the right way now!

 
Posted By: GaGambler
The WSJ said it would be very careful in ever using the word "lie" and I believe them, I don't recall them EVER calling out Obama for telling a "lie" although Barry told some whoppers.  
 

quadseasonal 27 Reviews 323 reads
posted
4 / 18

"As an example, Baker cited one of Trump’s more outrageous lies: When he claimed that thousands of Muslims in New Jersey gathered on rooftops to celebrate 9/11. Baker noted that the WSJ investigated his claim and found it baseless."

 
 Directly From the Washington Post   "In Jersey City, within hours of two jetliners' plowing into the World Trade Center, law enforcement authorities detained and questioned a number of people who were allegedly seen celebrating the attacks and holding tailgate-style parties on rooftops while they watched the devastation on the other side of the river."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/2001/09/18/northern-new-jersey-draws-probers-eyes/40f82ea4-e015-4d6e-a87e-93aa433fafdc/?utm_term=.1b9e6ab9530b

http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2015/11/washington-posts-fact-checker-doesnt-read-the-washington-post.php

bigguy30 305 reads
posted
5 / 18

Posted By: quadseasonal
"As an example, Baker cited one of Trump’s more outrageous lies: When he claimed that thousands of Muslims in New Jersey gathered on rooftops to celebrate 9/11. Baker noted that the WSJ investigated his claim and found it baseless."  
   
   
  Directly From the Washington Post   "In Jersey City, within hours of two jetliners' plowing into the World Trade Center, law enforcement authorities detained and questioned a number of people who were allegedly seen celebrating the attacks and holding tailgate-style parties on rooftops while they watched the devastation on the other side of the river."  
   
 http://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/2001/09/18/northern-new-jersey-draws-probers-eyes/40f82ea4-e015-4d6e-a87e-93aa433fafdc/?utm_term=.1b9e6ab9530b  
   
 http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2015/11/washington-posts-fact-checker-doesnt-read-the-washington-post.php

JackDunphy 250 reads
posted
6 / 18

Were there some people in the NYC/NJ area who celebrated? Yeah, I am sure there were. But were there thousands of them, like Trump actually said? No evidence of that.

In fact, Trump lovers Christie and Rudy are on record saying there were not thousands of people rejoicing from the attacks.

He also said he saw people jumping off the buildings from Trump tower. TT was about 4 miles from the WTC. Thats some pretty damn good eye sight. lol

ed2000 31 Reviews 277 reads
posted
7 / 18
GaGambler 215 reads
posted
8 / 18

His reading comprehension is almost as weak as his ability to write coherently. I suppose you have to start off with coherent thoughts before you can write a coherent sentence, which is as good an explanation for his practice of inserting a comma after every other word as any. I think his little pea brain can only comprehend words in groups of three or less, so he has to stop and insert a comma every two or three words in order to gather his thoughts. lol

JakeFromStateFarm 229 reads
posted
10 / 18

TP's headline totally mis-characterized what the WSJ executive said.  Beyond that, the WSJ is known as a solid and reliable newspaper on its "news side."  The editorial side is another matter and is about as right wing as a major media arm gets. But there's long been a very effective wall between news and opinion there.  So I'd be reluctant to condemn the WSJ before they've even done anything.
And thanks again for diminishing the credibility of the Left around here.
You really should just leave

GaGambler 258 reads
posted
12 / 18

and a thousand times smarter than anything fg has ever said

That of course includes even the many very dumb things Trump has said.

Still a thousand times smarter than anything that will ever come from fg.

RiverStark See my TER Reviews 199 reads
posted
13 / 18
FatVern 148 reads
posted
14 / 18

Most people didn't like the attack, but they may have had disdain for who feel the brunt of the WTC attak, the NY NJ Port Authority.

Just ask any dem, who crosses the GW, bridge.

bigguy30 387 reads
posted
15 / 18

So I don't care how your weak ass feels about the headline either.
The editor was responsible for the headline.
You can call them up and fight with them about it asshole.

Posted By: JakeFromStateFarm
TP's headline totally mis-characterized what the WSJ executive said.  Beyond that, the WSJ is known as a solid and reliable newspaper on its "news side."  The editorial side is another matter and is about as right wing as a major media arm gets. But there's long been a very effective wall between news and opinion there.  So I'd be reluctant to condemn the WSJ before they've even done anything.  
 And thanks again for diminishing the credibility of the Left around here.  
 You really should just leave

bigguy30 203 reads
posted
16 / 18

So don't cry about one headline now!

Posted By: ed2000
TP's headline is blatantly a lie, in and of itself.

JakeFromStateFarm 230 reads
posted
17 / 18

He must be terribly embarrassed.  If so, that would be a first.

bigguy30 200 reads
posted
18 / 18

You are really a bitter bitch and fool.
 

Posted By: JakeFromStateFarm
He must be terribly embarrassed.  If so, that would be a first.

Register Now!