What difference does it make ? ......................................

Hillary Clinton did not use or have a govt email address when she was Sec of State.
 http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/03/us/politics/hillary-clintons-use-of-private-email-at-state-department-raises-flags.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&module=a-lede-package-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=0

...Benghazi, Area 51 and Bigfoot.

...He didn't use a gov't email account.  Where was your concern about the security factor then?

From the NY Times article I posted. .....................

Quote:
“I can recall no instance in my time at the National Archives when a high-ranking official at an executive branch agency solely used a personal email account for the transaction of government business,” said Mr. Baron, who worked at the agency from 2000 to 2013.

Sorry, but this is yet another "issue" that I refuse to get my panties in a wad about.

Unless you can show where she broke some law by doing do, Frankly I really don't give a fuck, If it were THAT big a deal, someone would have insisted that she use a .gov address at the time, and we wouldn't just be hearing about it now.

Then it should also be an issue for Obama and his Chief of Staff for allowing it to occur.

My point remains, after the whole IRS email debacle, how much less secure could they have possibly been? Or did the Hildabeast all of a sudden lose 30,000 like Lois Lerner did?

1) It's a probable violation of the Federal Records Act.  The article points this out.
2) It was very likely her emails were less secure and could have been read by people who could have used them against our interests.
3) While she has now given her emails to the government, it was a potential oversight issue because Congress had a right to see them.
As you know, I'm generally supportive of her, but this has handed a huge club to her many enemies and it was just stupid and unnecessary on her part.

Not exactly a success story, is it?

I think your argument is the one falling flat on it's face, not mine.

I am hardly a fan of the Hildabeast, but this sounds like another non issue to me.

Now if you want to talk about Benghazi, or TravelGate, or even WhiteWater, I am all ears.

Lerner's missing emails were actually pretty damn secure, as it took experts months to be able to retrieve them.  So your comparison falls flat.

Nothing seems to go her way. No wonder she always has that ugly look on her face. Or is that just her face? lol

The truth of the matter is, she just doesn't seem to have that "Teflon coating" that both her husband and Obama seem to have. Shit slides right off of both Bill Clinton and Barrack Obama, but shit just seems to stick to her.  Maybe her coronation is not sure thing yet? I may have to pick one of the other candidates with longer odds to bet on.

The real irony about this "scandal" is that she did it for years, no one said shit, and all the blame is being laid squarely at her doorstep with both the Chief of Staff, and the POTUS getting a free pass when this happened on their watch.

But I'm too lazy to repeat it.  Your assignment is to go  back and read what I wrote.
Then write you're sorry 100 times on the blackboard.

............she has aways to go getting progressives truly on board her campaign wagon. The battle is on between centrist Democrats and true movement Progressives groups like move-on.org.

You're sorry, you're sorry, you're sorry, you're sorry, You're sorry, you're sorry, you're sorry, you're sorry You're sorry, you're sorry, you're sorry, you're sorry You're sorry, you're sorry, you're sorry, you're sorry You're sorry, you're sorry, you're sorry, you're sorry You're sorry, you're sorry, you're sorry, you're sorry, You're sorry, you're sorry, you're sorry, you're sorry You're sorry, you're sorry, you're sorry, you're sorry You're sorry, you're sorry, you're sorry, you're sorry You're sorry, you're sorry, you're sorry, you're sorry You're sorry, you're sorry, you're sorry, you're sorry, You're sorry, you're sorry, you're sorry, you're sorry You're sorry, you're sorry, you're sorry, you're sorry You're sorry, you're sorry, you're sorry, you're sorry You're sorry, you're sorry, you're sorry, you're sorry You're sorry, you're sorry, you're sorry, you're sorry, You're sorry, you're sorry, you're sorry, you're sorry You're sorry, you're sorry, you're sorry, you're sorry You're sorry, you're sorry, you're sorry, you're sorry You're sorry, you're sorry, you're sorry, you're sorry You're sorry, you're sorry, you're sorry, you're sorry, You're sorry, you're sorry, you're sorry, you're sorry You're sorry, you're sorry, you're sorry, you're sorry You're sorry, you're sorry, you're sorry, you're sorry You're sorry, you're sorry, you're sorry, you're sorry You're sorry, you're sorry, you're sorry, you're sorry, You're sorry, you're sorry, you're sorry, you're sorry You're sorry, you're sorry, you're sorry, you're sorry You're sorry, you're sorry, you're sorry, you're sorry You're sorry, you're sorry, you're sorry, you're sorry

Yes, you are totally fucking sorry, and wrong to boot.

I think righties have bigger problems to worry about, I honestly don't see Tea Party members agreeing to support any of the well known establishment Presidential candidates.

That was 124 "you're sorry"s.

For a self-professed lazy mofo, I can't believe he put in so much time and effort on this.  It would have been so much easier if he'd just gone back and read what I wrote until he actually understood it.

It took me less than a minute, much more time that your post deserved, but still hardly what I would call "time and effort"

As for "understanding" what you wrote, I already understand that you are making much ado about very little, and if this really is such an issue, why isn't Obama and his Chief of Staff being taken to task for the oversight on their watch.

Obama is Teflon. Bill Clinton was Teflon. The poor Hildabeast, everything sticks to her. lol