Politics and Religion

Weasel is . . . .
JakeFromStateFarm 255 reads
posted
1 / 15

Virtually everyone -- even McConnell -- said they were for it and Trump supported it. Until he met with the NRA's Wayne -- Bride of Satan -- La Pierre at Donnie's golf club in NJ. Naturally, he backed down. As he always has.
Weasel.

coeur-de-lion 400 Reviews 15 reads
posted
2 / 15

such a negative word.  I think you're being a little harsh.  He met with the opposition to the bill (NRA) who probably explained to him that NONE of the recent mass shooters would have been denied a gun purchase under the PROPOSED background checks from the House and Senate.  Something else that is more comprehensive is needed, and he will wait until Congress comes up with something that would flag the potential mass shooters.  I still like my idea of a psych evaluation for purchasers under 35 years of age.  Most black on black shooting is committed with guns purchased on the street, not from licensed dealers.  

 
The only people that will be screened out under the present proposed legislation are the bib-overall-wearing hillbillys who are not going to show up on a TRW report.  However, these are the rural people that NEED guns to put meat on the table for their families.  (Possum Kiev or Raccoon Alfredo anyone?)

GaGambler 18 reads
posted
3 / 15

Raccoon Alfredo??? EVERYONE knows that "coon" is a dark meat, who in their right mind would put a dark meat in a white Alfredo sauce?  

 
Must I teach you EVERYTHING??? lol

 
You are correct of course with your statement that the backround check that Trump just flip flopped on would not have stopped any of the recent mass shootings.

 
Now I will toss the libs a bone, just like "bump stocks" I could most definitely get behind a ban on "large capacity" barrel magazines that hold up to 100 rounds. Without the high capacity magazines an "assault rifle" only looks scarier than any other semi automatic rifle. Using the Dayton shooting as an example, without the high capacity magazine he had, the body count quite likely would have been cut in half. I am not in favor of "feel good" laws that don't actually have any impact on stopping these crimes, or even mitigating the body count, but bump stocks and 100 round magazines can't really be argued that they have a place in a civilized society.

impposter 49 Reviews 16 reads
posted
4 / 15

Posted By: coeur-de-lion
The only people that will be screened out under the present proposed legislation are the bib-overall-wearing hillbillys who are not going to show up on a TRW report.  However, these are the rural people that NEED guns to put meat on the table for their families.  (Possum Kiev or Raccoon Alfredo anyone?)
Do you have any recipes for Heart of Lion?  Imp Pasta would leave a funny taste in your mouth.

coeur-de-lion 400 Reviews 11 reads
posted
5 / 15

Nothing of yours is getting anywhere Near my mouth!!!!!!!

coeur-de-lion 400 Reviews 15 reads
posted
6 / 15

If GaG wants to outlaw high-capacity magazines, I'm willing to trade TWO high-capacity AR-15 mags for a full-auto conversion kit.  That should make me much safer to be around.  

coeur-de-lion 400 Reviews 14 reads
posted
7 / 15

raccoon  is a "dark" meat, in an alfredo sauce, it gives the dish a little color (I would add some English peas for color, too), and if you pair it with a nice pinot grigio, it actually "works."

coeur-de-lion 400 Reviews 11 reads
posted
8 / 15

didn't call me out for being wrong on this thread, you should have known that I am right, and whatever you post to the contrary will be wrong, and everyone will see it and think you're an idiot.  

JakeFromStateFarm 8 reads
posted
9 / 15

According to your post, if I DON'T call you out on a thread you must be right. Which can ONLY mean if I DO call you out on a thread you must be WRONG. And since I almost ALWAYS call you out that means you are almost always WRONG.
Thank you!

coeur-de-lion 400 Reviews 13 reads
posted
10 / 15

It doesn't mean anything of the kind.  It just means you don't have an argument to support the opposite side.  If you feel you have an argument, even a specious one, you jump in and call me out, buy it rarely ends with you being right, even though you will never admit you were wrong, as I do when I am.  Repeat after me, "I stand corrected."  You will have more cred if you use this once in awhile rather than trying to persuade us that you are infallible and ALWAYS right.  Another similarity you have with Trump.  Are you sure you're not related, and you are only bashing him here so no one will find out?  

impposter 49 Reviews 21 reads
posted
11 / 15

Posted By: coeur-de-lion
Re: When you saw that Jake . . . .
didn't call me out for being wrong on this thread, you should have known that I am right
That claim by CDL is just illogical and wrong.
.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverse_(logic)
You implied that you accept the Proposition: If P, then Q. If [Jake does call you out], then [you are wrong].
Inverse: If not P, then not Q. If [Jake does NOT call you out], then [you are NOT wrong].
.
Proposition: If something is a cat, then it is a mammal.
Inverse: If something is not a cat, then it is not a mammal.
.
The inverse of a proposition is not necessarily true.

-- Modified on 8/22/2019 11:07:14 PM

JakeFromStateFarm 14 reads
posted
12 / 15
impposter 49 Reviews 16 reads
posted
13 / 15

Posted By: coeur-de-lion
Re: Whoa . . . .
Nothing of yours is getting anywhere Near my mouth!!!!!!!
We finally agree on something!

coeur-de-lion 400 Reviews 13 reads
posted
14 / 15

on your claim of infallibility and always being right in all of your posts?  That's what Laffy does.  Maybe you're related to him and not Trump.  Its a genetic defect, but we don't know where you're getting it.  Were your parents brother and sister?  No, that would be too obvious to be true.  That's what you WANT us to think.  lol

coeur-de-lion 400 Reviews 12 reads
posted
15 / 15

Jake, not you.  If you use "tree mode", you can see who is talking to whom.  

Register Now!