Politics and Religion

What can 85 Million Test Subjects Tell You About Covid Shots?
willywonka4u 22 Reviews 25 reads
posted

A new paper has been published in the International Journal of Preventative Medicine. It’s entitled “COVID-19 Vaccination and Cardiovascular Events: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Multivariate Meta-Analysis of Preventive Benefits and Risks”.

 
They did a meta analysis, and it covers 85 million people from all across the globe. 46 million who got Covid shots and 40 million who didn’t. That’s quite the sample size. The shots they looked at include the Pfizer, AstraZeneca, and Moderna shots.

 
The study found the following:

 
For Coronary Artery Disease.
Pfizer First Dose, 64% increased risk
Second Dose (all vaccines) 244% increased risk

 
For Myocardial Infarction.
Pfizer First Dose, 87% increased risk
Pfizer Second Dose, 284% increased risk
Second Dose (all vaccines), 286% increased risk

 
For Arrhythmia.
First Dose (any vaccine), 199% increased risk
AstraZeneca First Dose, 389% increased risk

 
For Stroke.  
Pfizer, First Dose, 269% increased risk
First Dose (any vaccine), 240% increased risk

 
So much for “safe and effective”, eh?

The study also said:
"Results:  
Bayesian meta-analysis revealed a link between vaccines and CAD risk (OR, 1.70; 95% CrI: 1.11–2.57), particularly after BNT162b2 (OR, 1.64; 95% CrI: 1.06–2.55) and second dose (OR, 3.44; 95% CrI: 1.99–5.98). No increased risk of heart attack, arrhythmia, or stroke was observed post-COVID-19 vaccination. As the only noteworthy point, a protective effect on stroke (OR, 0.19; 95% CrI: 0.10–0.39) and myocardial infarction (OR, 0.003; 95% CrI: 0.001–0.006) was observed after the third dose of the vaccine.

Conclusions:  
Secondary analysis showed no notable disparity in cardiovascular outcomes between BNT162b2 and mRNA vaccines. The association of COVID-19 vaccination with the risk of coronary artery disease should be considered in future vaccine technologies for the next pandemic."

Please stop lying, Wanker.

Register Now!