Politics and Religion

votes
gentleguy1020 38 Reviews 320 reads
posted
1 / 11

"It’s wholly un-American": Harris County drive-thru voters await court rulings as Texas Republicans push to invalidate 127,000 votes
A conservative activist and three Republican candidates have asked state and federal courts to toss the votes and shut down drive-thru voting in the state's most populous, and largely Democratic, county.

macdaddy1944 51 Reviews 11 reads
posted
2 / 11

The GOP know they will lose big time..They know their only hope is to suppress and try to invalidate any votes through the courts..Desperate people take desperate measures..

lester_prairie 12 Reviews 19 reads
posted
3 / 11

Having people on a whim modifying election procedures leads to voting fraud (Project Veritas just caught some Texans paying people for their votes.)  
.
People who want different election laws have the political process (elections) to enact their desires.  We can't have random officials changing election procedures just on their own whim.

cks175 51 Reviews 13 reads
posted
4 / 11

Harris County Democrats should concede the lawsuit ASAP. Invalidate the illegal ballots now, giving those voters the chance to have their voices heard on Tuesday.

gentleguy1020 38 Reviews 21 reads
posted
5 / 11

Yeah, give them more than one Dropbox... GOP is marginaliged voters there big time!

cks175 51 Reviews 14 reads
posted
7 / 11

It’s very likely that SCOTX agrees with Les that the drive thru polling places are illegal.  The only issue they cited was the timing of the lawsuit.

Unfortunate for the defendants that SCOTX didn’t rule on the case in their favor, as a federal judge would give great weight to that decision.  As it stands, the federal judge will now judge the case on merits, with no state ruling to rely on.

gentleguy1020 38 Reviews 32 reads
posted
8 / 11

Why “It’s very likely” ? CKS?
They have already rejected the Republican case!
You are not just a stupid you are a lying stupid.

cks175 51 Reviews 11 reads
posted
9 / 11

This case wasn’t dismissed on its merits. That’s a legal concept so basic I’m almost surprised even you fail to grasp it.  Almost.

Had they taken the case and ruled on its merits, it’s very likely that the all Republican bench would have ruled in favor of the plaintiffs.
You're not just a stupid, you’re a lying stupid
You do prove the existence of stupidity with that line, you just don’t realize who the “a stupid” is.

inicky46 61 Reviews 30 reads
posted
10 / 11

Thats from the article I posted above. So where's your information proving that the ruling was on a technicality?

Register Now!