During the demonstrations the last few weeks, the Democrats had no problem with thousands of protestors violating the safe-distancing guidelines, but now they are calling out Republicans for attending Trump's upcoming rally in Tulsa. IT seems that are different health guidelines based on party preference.  Am  I the only one here that thinks that is just about the dumbest thing that government health workers have come up with?  How will they have any cred the next time around with a pandemic?  

 
Apparently, the Left believes that the coronavirus is ON THEIR SIDE and will only infect Republicans who are too close together, but that the virus will spare the Democrat protesters because they are protesting for a good cause.  What a devious way to engineer a virus.  Imagine a virus that plays politics?  

I mean look at Once. He can denigrate Sharpton but I cant criticize Obama for hiring him? Does that make ANY sense???

 
And I don't mean to pick on, or single out, Once. He has been a moderate voice here lately, and fair to the police, so I will give him his due. But he is just my most recent example to back up the point.

 
But there is CLEARLY two sets of rules liberals have; one for them and a TOTALLY different set for R's. Whether it is on race, misogyny, homophobia, or now Covid, its just wash, rinse, repeat.

 
They can feel free to do that, just as we can feel free to point out the utter hypocrisy of it all whenever they do it.

END OF MESSAGE

I've been watching CNN and MSNBC and BOTH of them have been reporting for WEEKS about the danger of COVID spread at the demonstrations.  
Here's a link to just one article from more than two weeks ago, but there are plenty more.
You see, there's this new thing called Google where you can look stuff up.
Or just be like Hack and keep your head wedged up your ass.

Jonathan Turley, Law scholar, calling out Pelosi for HER duplicity.  When she talks out of both sides of her mouth, how do you know which side to trust?  

END OF MESSAGE

that is not going to take you anywhere.  

END OF MESSAGE

Didn't stick to message...weird but?

...he had no FACTS to back it up.  He just pulled that post out of his ass.  inicky rightly called BULLSHIT, stuck to the topic of the OP and provided a link.

 
Cur-de-Liar, having exhausted his feeble intellect, had to then change the topic of his own OP and divert to:  But, but, but...Turley...Pelosi...duplicity...

 
Cur-de-Liar is so far out of his league intellectually on this board.  He should retreat to the safety of the K-Girl board where he can assuage his feelings by pretending to be the king of that board.

The left are the folks wearing the masks.

How do you tell Republicans from Democrats at a Trump rally?  You can't tell becaue they are all cheering Trump and will vote for him in November.  Before he suspended his rallies because of Covid-19, he was pulling in 20-25% democrats at every rally.  If even half of them vote for Trump, its curtains for Biden.

but they are wearing them NOT because of COVID, they are wearing them because they are looters and rioters and don't want their face caught on camera, just in case anyone in LE decides that rioting, burning and looting is actually against the law and should be prosecuted someday.

 
The righties are PROUD to be seen at a Trump rally, and unless they are worried about being targeted by ANTIFA they have no need for anonymity.

The looters were all wearing masks. Makes facial recognition impossible, and they don't stand in one place long enough to get the serial number off the big-screen they are hauling away.  

From the 1st thorough the 116th Congress, this is the breakdown of control of the US senate, house and presidency by party (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Party_divisions_of_United_States_Congresses).  

 
(sorry but copying a table into TER is not like Word, the format goes askew)

Party:  Senate; House; Presidency; %'age Senate; %'age House; %'age Presidency
Democratic:  50; 58; 44; 43%; 50%; 38%
Republican:  43; 36; 45; 37%; 31%; 39%
Democratic-Republican:  12; 13; 14; 10%; 11%; 12% (many from this party became the current Democratic party)
Federalist:  3; 2; 2; 3%; 2%; 2% (If I remember correctly a number of these left to for the Whig's)
Pro-Administration:  3; 2; 0; 3%; 2%; 0%
Whig:  2; 2; 2; 2%; 2%; 2% (some of these left to form the current Republican part)
National Republican:  1; 1; 0; 1%, 1%, 0% (not related to the current Republican party)
Anti-Administration:  0; 1; 0; 0%; 1%, 0%
Opposition:  0; 1; 0; 0%; 1%; 0%
National Union:  0; 0; 2; 0%; 0%; 2%
Split control:  2; 0; 1; 2%; 0%; 1%
Independent:  0; 0; 5; 0%; 0%; 4%

 
Another wiki shows that since 1922 the breakdown of US state governors by party (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_party_strength_in_U.S._states).

 
Democrats held 52% (1,907 cumulative years in office 1922 to 2020)
Republicans 47% (1,703 cumulative years in office 1922 to 2020)
Independent 1% (40 cumulative years in office 1922 to 2020)

 
The same link shows years state governments since 1977
Democrats held 27% (587 cumulative years in office 1977 to 2020)
Republicans 23% (516 cumulative years in office 1977 to 2020)
Split 50% (1,097 cumulative years in office 1977 to 2020)

 
There are probably some statistics somewhere that show a breakdown at local government levels, but was taking too long to find.

I'm surprised I can still play you like this.  Who does THAT make the weaker intellect here?   All I have to do is lay off for a few days, and then you take the bait, hook, line and sinker.  OR should I say hook, line and stinker.  I almost forgot about the dead fish breath.  A provider's words, not mine.  I'm just borrowing them from her.

only comes back for his "bitch slap" of the day.  He craves attention, even if it is negative.

 
Don't be surprised if he PMs you, thank you for giving him air time, and of course, the "bitch slap."  Resembles Trump, more and more with every post.

 
Don't you think?