Politics and Religion

LGBTQ Activist and Trans Husband Housed Trans Minor Against Mom’s Wishes
cks175 44 Reviews 132 reads
posted
1 / 9

This is literally insane. Police did not intervene in favor of the girl’s parents.

A man dressed as a woman and his wife are harboring a 17-year-old autistic runaway against her mother's wishes, and are indulging, and encouraging, her gender fantasies.  

And the girl's biological mother can't get her back. Despicable
In police footage, the girl’s mother referred to her as a female. The Smothermans used male pronouns to refer to the girl.

LostSon 43 Reviews 22 reads
posted
2 / 9

Posted By: cks175

This is literally insane. Police did not intervene in favor of the girl’s parents.
A man dressed as a woman and his wife are harboring a 17-year-old autistic runaway against her mother's wishes, and are indulging, and encouraging, her gender fantasies.  
   
 And the girl's biological mother can't get her back. Despicable
In police footage, the girl’s mother referred to her as a female. The Smothermans used male pronouns to refer to the girl.

Wait a second if the child is technically a runaway, can't the police return her to her home?

willywonka4u 22 Reviews 19 reads
posted
3 / 9

Call the FBI and have them put in prison.

cks175 44 Reviews 17 reads
posted
4 / 9
inicky46 61 Reviews 20 reads
posted
5 / 9

Yeah, I guess Kash Patel has already fixed that bunch, or that's what Wanker seems to believe.

cks175 44 Reviews 13 reads
posted
6 / 9

Under Biden/Harris, we wouldn’t be surprised if it turned out that the DOJ/FBI had investigated the runaway’s parents. Now I don’t know if there’s a federal case here or not, but we do know parental rights will be a priority going forward.

inicky46 61 Reviews 17 reads
posted
7 / 9
cks175 44 Reviews 19 reads
posted
8 / 9

Jonathan Turley:

Gavin Newsom doubled down on teachers not telling parents about children changing genders: "I don’t think they should be required to turn in kids" to their parents. Democrats are about to find out that parental rights are not partisan, they are primal.
“’Now, you have to choose between two roads,’ ” Jiang wrote. “Thin-Face looked straight into my eyes. ‘You can break with your family and follow Chairman Mao, or you can follow your father and become an enemy of the people.’”

Thankfully, we are constitutionally and culturally protected against such authoritarianism. Yet, we are experiencing our own type of cultural revolution as parents and schools collide over the education of our children.
In a truly Orwellian line, the judges declared, “As per our understanding of Supreme Court precedent, our pluralistic society assigns those curricular and administrative decisions to the expertise of school officials, charged with the responsibility of educating children.”

Most of us must have missed that memo. Few would believe that sending our children to a public school means we have transferred the most fundamental parental rights to “experts” on rearing our children.
In the meantime, Foote should be appealed to the Supreme Court, which can reinforce the constitutional protection afforded to parents.

A century ago, the nation’s highest court ruled in Pierce v. Society of Sisters that “the child is not the mere creature of the State; those who nurture him and direct his destiny have the right, coupled with the high duty, to recognize and prepare him for additional obligations.”

In its 2000 Troxel v. Granville decision, the court recognized “the fundamental right of parents to make decisions concerning the care, custody, and control of their children.”

There is no greater natural right than the right to control the upbringing of our children. This right was not granted to us by the grace of the state. It rests with us as human beings.

inicky46 61 Reviews 15 reads
posted
9 / 9

Not to mention that Newsom seems to be trying to re-make himself as a centrist, not this. Not to mention the Dems should be letting Trump and his MAGA pals make more unforced errors instead of handing the Reps a cudgel.

Register Now!