Politics and Religion

This interview....
crsm27 32 Reviews 66 reads
posted

Really doesn't throw anything "new" out there.    She is talking about heavily redacted info.   A call to the FBI of the 13 year old allegation.   Which we don't know what allegation it is.  The one that has been debunked or not.    

 
She is more critical of the whole things being redacted and victims names are not redacted.

 
I will say it again.   If there is evidence of actual rape and it was Trump.   Throw the book at him and let him burn.    But this right here is nothing "new".   It is the same old criticism of the whole situation going on.   Over redaction of people involved and yet they don't redact some of the victim's info.     This is nothing "new".

 
But people will tote it as "break thru" and "see trump is guilty", etc.     When it does nothing of the sort.    

edinathens286 reads

The Department of Justice allegedly removed, withheld, or redacted dozens of pages from the Epstein files relating to Trump's alleged sexual abuse of a minor decades ago . . .
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MG1xu9kq5i4

Click on play button to hear the first podcast . . .  
http://www.wbur.org/hereandnow/2026/02/24/epstein-files-npr-investigation

-- Modified on 2/25/2026 2:57:45 PM

See what happens when you cut public broadcasting funding. Again, FAFO. This is also why we need a free press.

Now all the conspiracy theorists will be sure Donald is a child-raper.  And they're the ones who voted for him.

Really doesn't throw anything "new" out there.    She is talking about heavily redacted info.   A call to the FBI of the 13 year old allegation.   Which we don't know what allegation it is.  The one that has been debunked or not.    

 
She is more critical of the whole things being redacted and victims names are not redacted.

 
I will say it again.   If there is evidence of actual rape and it was Trump.   Throw the book at him and let him burn.    But this right here is nothing "new".   It is the same old criticism of the whole situation going on.   Over redaction of people involved and yet they don't redact some of the victim's info.     This is nothing "new".

 
But people will tote it as "break thru" and "see trump is guilty", etc.     When it does nothing of the sort.    

What are you talking about? An FBI worksheet, evidently released in error, noted that a woman the FBI interviewed 4 times in 2019 reported that she gave trump head when she was only 13 or 14. And because evidently she was too toothy it's reported that trump hit her. The 302s from the interviews has not been released. Bondi is covering up the release of the 302s because that allegation would make trump an alleged child rapist. Such allegations would likely be impossible to prove in court since it's a "he said, she said" situation unless there are video and audio tapes. Everything must be released now. Stop covering up this shit.

he thinks it's fine that Trump's name was redacted from the rape allegations and that the FBI covered it up.

http://www.livenowfox.com/news/missing-epstein-files-trump-sexual-assault-claims-withheld-lawmakers-say
Bottom line: Put an end to the rumors and innuendos by releasing all the Epstein files, then let the chips fall where they may.

Register Now!