Richard Dawkins just got his entire Facebook page deleted for saying a boxer with XY chromosomes is a man.

VP candidate Walz also advocates government censorship. He says government should be able to prohibit "misinformation".  Naturally government gets to define misinformation and also when it qualifies for suppression. We see this playing out in Progressive UK -- not only Russia or China. It will come to our shores just as vehemently if we don't start to turn back the increasing power of Big Brother state.

The boxer in question only on the word of one man tested that way. The fact is the results of the test were never published. Read and educate yourself.

Richard Dawkins on the other hand is one of the most important evolutionary biologists in history. Dawkins’ “The Selfish Gene” transformed evolutionary biology by presenting a model that would not just move the entire field forward by leaps and bounds, but help give birth to entire new scientific disciplines like evolutionary psychology. When Dawkins speaks on matters of biology there are few in this world who on his level.  

You are the least qualified to talk about the difference between XY and XX …ya know what I mean?

And opinions are not facts just because a scientist spoke it. Facts are facts no matter whose mouth they come from. Tell me exactly what in my article is not true. Tell me where her gender was published for everyone to see.

When Dawkins is speaking on a matter of biology it is not an opinion. It is Dawkins relating the EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE from a field in which he has devoted his entire life to study, and helped to transform the field, becoming one of the most important evolutionary biologists to ever live. Dawkins is right up there with Darwin, W.D. Hamilton, and Robin Trivers as one of the all time heavyweights in the field.  

All you do is continue to heap praise on Dawkins like he’s some kind of god. You have failed to answer my questions.  The best part is that when Dawkins tweeted about his FB account being deleted, he himself said his opinions (his words not mine) are open for debate. He called the boxer a male. He said she has XY chromosomes. These are not facts because they have not been proven. No proof has been shared with anyone. It’s the word of one Russian hack. This isn’t science. You’re just a lemming that won’t let go of real facts.

That link was informative. I was going to say, "Settle the controversy. Just get a DNA test and show the world whether you are XX or XY." But the article mentions "People with Swyer syndrome, according to the National Library of Medicine, have one X chromosome and one Y chromosome in each cell (typically found in boys and men), but they have female reproductive structures. Again, it's not known whether either of the boxers has these genetic variations."  
.
There have been other XX-confirmed female athletes over the years with NATURAL very high testosterone levels who had that competitive advantage. I seem to recall a fairly recent case (2000s) where the governing body required a high-testosterone XX female to take drugs to bring her testosterone levels down to their max allowed level in order to compete.  
.
But back to Dawkins: I don't do Social Media. I don't think that he should be deplatformed from Facebook. I haven't read the complete twitter post that got him banned. It isn't clear (to me) whether Dawkins claimed that the boxer definitely had XY *chromosomes* or that she had  XY *TRAITS* (such as high testosterone). Many articles talk about "XY traits" which does not always mean having a big dick.

Your repetition of MISINFORMATION does not make that false information true. Walz was talking about "ELECTION misinformation."
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/politics-and-religion-39/your-own-misinformation-446144

So are you saying that walz wants to prohibit ELECTION misinformation like this

"There's no guarantee to free speech on misinformation or hate speech, and especially around our democracy." -- aWalz
.
"especially" means not limited to.  Hate speech is protected by the US Constitution, since the government doesn't (yet) get to define what hate speech is.  Misinformation is also whatever government decides when Walz is in power.
.
This guy is a commie pure and simple -- "one man's socialism is another man's neighborliness."  

Seems like it.

There are not many reasons why someone would get their FB account deleted. I’m guessing that decided what he said was a form of hate speech. Of course something like this is always objective and there will be varying opinions if it is or is not. I’m not sure if what he wrote warrants his FB account being deleted either. But we should call it what it is. He was sharing an opinion, not just facts, and that opinion was not a favorable one towards the boxer and her gender. So I can see why some would consider it hateful.