are in this administration,  I call it darn right scary.  Thoughts from both sides of the?   We need to stand up,  and I say it is time for a revolution.
 
 

http://frontpagemag.com/2013/frontpagemag-com/the-muslim-brotherhood-infiltrates-obama-administration/

How many Xicanos, convert to Islam.

..So let me get this straight, you're not ok with Muslims being in the cabinet?  Since when in the heck does one's religion have anything to do with their job qualifications?  Or is it just your fear that since they're not white, Christian males they obviously want to destroy America?  America was NOT founded as a Christian nation and it has no national religion.  America is a wonderful place because no matter your beliefs, you can accomplish anything if you're willing to work hard. My brain was insulted by reading your thoughts.  I will pray for you and your ignorance.  Hopefully one day all that will matter to you is whether or not a person can do the job.  
I am fully aware that one of the first lines of defense will be "but Muslims hate us!".  Yeah, some do.  We gave them plenty of good reason to.  But that's a select few.  There are a select few Christians, Buddhist and Atheists who hate us also.  Grow up.

I can't condone profiling. Where I live it is widespread and I'll have nothing to do with it.


Samiam

With all due respect Sir,  we are "the INFIDELES" to  the Muslims and if you don't think so,  then just pray for yourself,  don't pray for me.  I am a Spiritualist/Pantheist and have no believe in your "Gelatinous Being" that says I am going to hell.  
And since when were soo many Muslims in an Administration?  And as far as   your statement  "America is a wonderful place because no matter your beliefs, you can accomplish anything if you're willing to work hard."  Yes it does appear that the Muslims  (and yes I recognize all MUslims are not that way,  I have Muslim best friend in the business,  and she will not let anyone know that she is Muslim because of the radicals in our society)  do beieve,  come to America,  get welfare,  get school paid then ATTACK.  And if you think they are not infiltrating,  come back when we have the next attack and say that,  or better yet,  pray to your God.

Pray tell,  might you have a better way to protect the citizens of America?  HMMMM

I don't think it would make a difference.

and truth be told it explains many of the horrible things we have done as a nation.

but as for Muslims in the Cabinet or anywhere else in Government, unless they start calling for sharia law, they are no more scary than fundamentalist Christians in positions of power, actually a lot less so. Have you heard some of the stupid shit that comes out of the mouths of such "mainstream Christians" as Rick Perry or Todd Akin? now that's fucking scary, and they are actually in positions of real power.

I suppose the OP was in favor of rounding up all the slant eyes during WWII too, because they might be loyal to the motherland? I too would ask the OP to grow the fuck up, but you can't fix stupid.

Honestly WIlly,  I have very little in faith in our government protecting our boundaries,  the first priorities these days is to line their own pocketbooks.

Have you ever heard of the Trojan Horse?  Its here.

I get so goddamn tired of people thinking that "lining up" an entire race and shooting them solves problems.

Maybe my BLACK foreman should go on welfare cuz we all know that's all they're good for. O this makes me angry

Bye bye

Samiam

I haven't been following the story that much, I'm just going by what I have heard.

Bring up gun control or taxes and one of the first things you'll hear, from the right is "the Slippery Slope." We all know what that means, so I won't go into it. However,  for many on the right, when it comes to talking about taking away someone's civil rights as a U.S. citizen, the concept goes out the window!  

ttp://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2013/04/boston_bombing_suspect_stops_t.html

I am glad, but with some reservations that an American citizen on American soil will not be, and still cannot be tried as an "enemy combatant" by a military tribunal. That would be the ultimate example of a "slippery slope" and would scare me more than a thousand bombers.

The thought that I could be swept up off the street, detained indefinitely, and tried by a military tribunal without due process of law quite frankly scares me even more than the very real terrorist threat that we face. I hate to say this but we need the loony left to protect our rights every bit as much as we need the "law and order" right to protect us from terrorists both from within and from abroad.

Here in L.A. one probably has more of chance of getting shot or run over due to "Road Rage," than being killed by a terrorist. Once you give to someone the powers that the law enforcement officers have, things can go south very quickly, even for the average behaving and looking citizen. And, the more power, the more temptation to abuse it. And, we all know that the cops protect their own.

I wonder how many Palestinians there are! I guess we both know the answer to that question, don't we?  

The rationale is/was that they had an ironclad case against him even if every thing he told them before being Mirandized where to be thrown out, (which of course it would be).LE wanted to exert as much pressure as possible to get him to reveal any other plots he might have known about to save potential lives.

I have very mixed emotions about this one. If lives were saved because of this it could be argued that trampling his constitutional rights was justified, and if it saved someone I knew you would be hard pressed to get me to think otherwise, BUT where do we stop in our efforts to save lives? Do we give up all of freedoms and become a police state in order to feel safe? Tough questions and I don't really have the answer, but the term "slippery slope" certainly applies here.

His rights were not trampled by the pre-Miranda interrogation.  There is a special exception in that ruling permitting a delay in reading him his rights if the public safety is at risk, as it was in this case because LE did not know if there were more bombs out there as well as co-conspirators.  Once they had enough to be sure that was not the case, they read him his rights as they were required to do.  As you have pointed out, none of the pre-Miranda info they received needs to be admissible, given the other evidence

Yes, this would have been considered "trampling on his constitutional rights"

I will grant it's a tough balancing act between keeping the public safe, and safeguarding our constitutional rights. Like I said, I have very mixed emotions on this, but I will agree that in this case at least, and from what I have heard SO FAR at least that LE operated in a legal and judicious manner. If other facts come out to the contrary I might very well change my mind, but this is by no means an easy call for LE.

Sassy,

It's certainly not the first time sassyfla has posted an extremely bigoted post.
 

fine,  it is not the first time the crowd didn't agree with me,   so I am now the board ogre.  Oh well,  can't say as I ever backed down from a my viewpoint,  and no it is not racist,  it is the belief that our boundaries should be first and foremost.  I don't care what color they are,  if our people's lives are at stake,  that should supersede all Political Correctness,  in fact,  PC is destroying this country.

Spewing hate through all offices and becoming dumber by the second, it is highly possible

the seemingly departed and unlamented Nancy.

How is what you said not racist? You have no reason to hate the individual but you grouped them all together. You can't even state exactly why any of those government officials are evil. You have zero proof but sputtering out hate.