Posted By: coeur-de-lion
It's pretty hard to dispute your own likeness and voice on a video, wouldn't you say.
With deceptive editing and biased commentary, you can make misleading claims about anything and anyone. For example, the Mayor of America lost a $148 lawsuit to two Georgia election workers after he defamed them by showing a video in which he claimed a roll of breath mints was actually a USB flash drive with fake votes. July didn't buy it.
When you see corruption, what is wrong with planting an investigator in the organization to either confirm or deny it?
As long as it's done legally and ethically, I don't have an issue. But . . . "On June 1, 2017, Robert Creamer's firm, Democracy Partners, filed a $1 million lawsuit against Project Veritas, claiming it had lied to gain access to the firm and violated anti-wiretapping laws.[155] In September 2022, a jury found that Project Veritas had violated wiretapping laws and misrepresented itself to Democracy Partners, which the jury awarded $120,000. Project Veritas said it would appeal the decision.[156][36]
80% of Americans think the pardon of Hunter is corrupt and confirms the two-tiered system of justice the Dems use regularly against Republicans and to favor Dems.
I predict Trump will use it as an excuse to pardon Jan 6th insurrectionists. Wait and see.
-- Modified on 12/4/2024 3:44:00 PM