Rose McGowan, Evan Rachel Wood, The Atlantic, The Slimes, etc all turning on Joe! WOW!

 
http://media.breitbart.com/media/2020/05/ERW.jpg

Wasn't it just this morning he was claiming Biden would only get softball questions. Yet no praise for Mika, who actually asked tough questions. And Biden handled them well. Much better than our inarticulate, bumbling, babbling President.
Now let's see if Reade actually comes forward  It's early, but so far, crickets. And to say the folks he cites are "all turning on Joe" is ludicrous.
First of all, who the fuck is Evan Rachel Wood? Second, the Rose McGowan piece was quite fair and hardly a slam. Unless you're a political hack, Hack.

-- Modified on 5/1/2020 6:57:53 PM

Rose is an emotional and mental wreck and always has been.  Evan Rachel Wood is seriously hot, but not really a major political beacon of thought.  The Atlantic article makes an incredibly weak argument that Joe is evading releasing his personal papers that he donated to the University of Delaware.  He makes it abundantly clear that any HR complaint against him would be in the National Archives and he has already sent a request to the Secretary of the Senate to make those records available.  I’m not sure he had to, because its public record, but he did anyway.  Thats the kind of guy he is.  Trump would have filed a lawsuit and try to sign an EO making all public records unavailable.

Since Joe donated his personal papers, which he describes as his speeches, position statements, etc.  NOT Human Resource documents it would be a WASTE OF TIME to look there.  Besides he has no control over the Universities property and it would be unprecedented for him to waive the condition that the papers not be made public until two years after he retires from public life.  Such agreements are commonplace.

These facts are all stated in the article.  You either did not understand them or you are being intellectually dishonest by not considering them in your ridiculous  premise that the left is turning against him.  Two crazy actresses and a hard hitting inquiry, which Joe handled honestly and directly does not equal progressives all of sudden preferring this idiocracy we now have to continue a day more than it has to.

I’m glad Joe is getting this thrown at him.  He will certainly be able to demonstrate to the American People what a straight shooter and honorable man he is and able to act responsibly under pressure.   Indeed this may all be another fake liberal hoax.  You will never know and I’m not saying anything else.  

But Trumpy pants is going to have a very full diaper in November.  

Were you with him when the alleged assault took place? That was an odd comment. Notice I have never said Creepy was guilty. I have no idea. I am willing to give him due process but making a statement that Joe handled this "honestly" would be JUST as dumb as me saying he is guilty as charged, so do you want to stick with your "intellectually dishonest" comment?

 
And why are you so concerned about a "waste of time?" How could you possibly know that? Did you see Mika question him today? He kept dodging the question. He is hiding something or he would ask the U of D to release the records. That would be full transparency right? Something he says he is all about.

 
And thank you for bringing up the National Archives and they rebutted what Biden said. Per my link from ANOTHER progressive site:

 
"He declined to speculate as to Reade’s motives and called on the secretary of the Senate to search for her complaint in the National Archives — the “only … place a complaint of this kind could be,” Biden said. Less surefooted than these broad strokes were their substance and delivery. Soon after Biden called for the search, a National Archives spokesperson told Business Insider that they do not hold the records to which he referred, which, if true, means the vice-president directed the inquiry toward an easily verifiable dead end."

 
"Easily verifiable dead end." Hmmmmmm....

 
Does that should like "full transparency" to you or does it sound like someone not being fully honest and not wanting the public to find the full truth? Hmmmmmm....

 
#BelieveAllWomenUnlessTheyAccuseJoeBiden

seems to have done a 180 from the position he took when Kavanaugh was on the hot-seat with an accuser like he is now.  He said then that for a woman to come forward on a national stage with an accusation, there must be some truth to it, and it should be accepted, even if her story has become a little shaky from the passage of time (I'm paraphrasing), but now he is saying his own accuser cannot be believed unless she has proof.  
Apparently, he has not heard of either circumstantial evidence.  Likewise with transparency by releasing his own records to show he has nothing to hide.  When asked about releasing his sealed archives, he said they are "private."

In using critical thinking to evaluate allegations and test credibility, Tara Reader's accusation against Biden fails the test of credibility. Details in this article explain why.

I have to admit that when Tara Reade’s accusations against Joe Biden first went public, I thought she was just some floozy trying to get some notoriety. However, After listening to her interview with Katie Halper, I was impressed with the way she detailed her side of the story. If it’s all a piece of fiction, whoever wrote it is a master playwright; and she’s a great actress. I recommend that everyone listen to it in its entirety and make your own decision. It certainly is much more convincing than Susan Blasey Ford’s vague memories and ramblings were in the Kavanaugh hearings.  It also is interesting that the mainstream media seems to have put her interview on the back burner.
All that being said, I still believe that the accused is presumed innocent until being proved guilty. Unfortunately that changed in the Kavanaugh hearings. Will it happen again?

Easy.  Years of practice.  Joe advised the Secretary of the Senate, where according to the National Archives said the records were at, to release the records.  Joe simply misspoke when he said National Archives, when he likely meant the Senate Archives - the exact location that he contacted.  I didn’t know there was a difference either until I read that article which was about the only useful information in it.

As no one would know that definitively either way in a he said/she said. Biden needs due process, the exact thing he himself DIDNT want for Kavanaugh.

 
To me, it's all about Biden being shown as a complete fraud, liar, hypocrite with NO desire for "full" transparency, like he has lectured Trump on many occasions.

 
No one forced him to say "believe all women." He did that of his own, stupid, insane volition. He made that bed, he now has to sleep in it.  

 
It's about time SOME good peeps on the Left are applying #metoo rules to their own.  

 
The rest of the dolts on the Left don't understand how this all helps Trump come November.  

 
#ReleaseTheRecordsJoeWhatAreYouHiding?

He bleats "#ReleaseTheRecordsJoeWhatAreYouHiding?" when Biden has asked the Senate to do EXACTLY that.
PS:  Biden DOESN'T need "due process," you dolt. That's what you get in court when accused of a crime. The only court here is public opinion. And Kavanaugh wasn't accused of a crime either. He was undergoing a confirmation hearing and wasn't in court. The Senate sets the rules and Republicans controlled the Senate and the hearings.  Kavanaugh reaped what McConnell sowed when he blocked Garland from a hearing: a totally politicized confirmation process. He got what he deserved: the opportunity to cry like a little girl
Jesus, Hack, could you BE a bigger fuck-up?