Write Review
1,980,906 Total Reviews 3,387 New Reviews
6,403 Users Online

Politics and Religion

"St Matt", I will say your constant partisan shilling for Obama isn't "weak"
Priapus53 1175 reads
posted

but it IS "wearing thin", as many on this board will attest to------:)



-- Modified on 4/19/2011 1:13:52 PM

Priapus533024 reads

Perhaps this is due to his falling approval numbers; be sure to watch the video on the link.

Related Link: http://news.yahoo.com/s/yblog_theticket/20110419/ts_yblog_theticket/president-obama-get...

ReplyQuoteReport
Officer Cartman832 reads

Obama speaks in a very slow, deliberate manner.  He's far from concise.  Most of these reporters will have just a few minutes during a 1 on 1 and they will interrupt him to move it along.  People got pissed at Bill O'Reilly during the Super bowl interview but he won't be permitted to ramble like he does during his press conferences.

ReplyQuoteReport
mattradd1572 reads

No big deal one way or another. I imagine those on the right can see through your weak attempt. There are plenty of more meaty issues to criticize President Obama for than a TV news interview.

-- Modified on 4/19/2011 12:59:31 PM

ReplyQuoteReport
Priapus531176 reads

but it IS "wearing thin", as many on this board will attest to------:)



-- Modified on 4/19/2011 1:13:52 PM

ReplyQuoteReport
mattradd1785 reads

I have been a shill for President Obama, as the term is defined?

Related Link: http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=shill

ReplyQuoteReport
marikod1458 reads

That happens to be Priapus's favorite reference source.True, he does not read it but then he posts about lots of things that he has never has read.

    But I'm very concerned bc Priapus says you have engaged in "constant shilling" for Mr. Obama so we can all expect a reply with extensive links. I'd say it would take at least 15 a month to reach the "constant" level.

ReplyQuoteReport
Priapus531677 reads

therefore, a subjective count that constitutes
"shilling" would be problematic, at best.

As to what I've "never read", my taste in literature,compared to yours, is quite "rarefied".
I prefer Faulkner & Kafka to the work of "cultist hacks" like Raynd & L Ron Hubbard. How do I know the previous works by the 2 authors are junk, without reading them ? Well, if it quacks like a duck--------

ReplyQuoteReport
marikod2213 reads

you have never actually read a shill by him, much less observed "constant shilling." H'mm.

Okay, let's go to the second part of your post:

   "as many on this board will attest to"

       Surely you'll agree that is objective and we can measure that by how many posters chime in - "yeah, I'm tired of Mattrad's constant shilling too." Let's see how many we get by tomorrow.

     Hey, I'm not necessarily disagreeing with you, I just don't ever recall reading any shills by him  - only statements supported by the facts or reasonable opinions. But, as soon as you show me otherwise, I'm going to jump all over him for "constant subjective shilling."

ReplyQuoteReport
Timbow2417 reads

Posted By: Priapus53
Perhaps this is due to his falling approval numbers; be sure to watch the video on the link.

ReplyQuoteReport
willywonka4u1120 reads

ReplyQuoteReport
Post Reply Back To Forum
Register Now!