Karl Rove, who helped mastermind the 2006 mid-term Senate losses, is making up so many contradictory things about Obama, that they have failed to define him....In 2004, they went w/an elitist tag with Kerry right from the get-go & made that work..But they have called Obama too many different things, & they will not be able to make any of them stick...


"Taegan Goddard at Political Insider notes that the Republicans have squandered their opportunity to "define" Barack Obama during the primary season and the past few weeks. They have called him too many contradictory things. Is he:
     - an elite country clubber or a guy with a strange name raised by a hippie?
     - a Christian with a controversial pastor or a secret Muslim?
     - a black activist who hates whitey or an Ivy League lawyer who doesn't understand Joe Sixpack?
     - someone who is naive or someone who is a Washington insider?

He can't be all of them at once. Now it is too late to define him as Obama, backed by tons of money, will be defining himself very soon."

WTF Obama can't keep straight about Obama. He is proving himself to be just another pol who talks out of all three sides of his mouth.

Did you see him trying to straddle the SC decision today? Just another example of a slimy politician who will say whatever is neccesary to get votes.

Oh amd BTW Moose, cutting and pasting a resume that looks like it belongs to someone running for alderman is not an answer to my question. You still have not shown me a single thing that he has accomplished or even planned that would give me the slightest reason to vote for him. On the contrary you have reinforced my opinion that he would make the worst POTUS since Carter and maybe even worse.

ACLU are all doing a wondeful job of keeping poll takers on the FlimFlamma bandwagon....

hope, change,

talk about happenstance.  Karl Rove gets a going over today at the hands of some pinko named James moore at The huffington Post.  and check out the next-to-last paragraph.



http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jim-moore/the-unbearable-lightness_b_109200.html

He appears to be a serial idiot (i.e. politician).

who changes more often than the weather...Detailed list below of some of his flip flops...

I believe I answered your original question (from the earlier post) at least 2-3x...And it is not possible to be a worse POTUS than Bush, Obama wouldn't be that bad even if he tried...Bush will be lucky for his approval rating to stay above the drinking age - he's in the high 20's now, but there's still time for him to drop more....

-- Modified on 6/26/2008 10:08:02 PM

"Bush will be lucky for his approval rating to stay above the drinking age -""

You Keithy O'Dopermen are crack-ups.

But hey, you've got the stones to be posting under your TER handle. That's more than I can say for some of the vajayjays hanging round here....

-- Modified on 6/26/2008 10:14:04 PM

I thought Obama was a PROGRESSIVE? I am shocked to hear that Obama, leader of the liberals, supports capital punishment for crimes other than murder. But here he is, siding with the conservative minority led by Justice Alito in this week’s 5-to-4 Supreme Court ruling.

and soon, Moore's reason for living, his white whale, will be out of office on 1/20/09. It is sad/funny to read in his bio he has been conducting a 10 yr investigation of Bush ANG's service record.


You gotta love his use of language: "The NYT could find no evidence" that the CIA agent was undercover. He doesn't say it's not true, just that they could find no evidence. The NYT couldn't figure out that a guy in their fucking newsroom in the middle of their own building was making stuff up. So who would be surprised that they can't find evidence. They can't find any advertisers, either. Damn shame.

longer than Bush's was when he took office.

let's try setting the bar just a little bit higher this time, ok?