Politics and Religion

So, how does this work? ;)confused_smile
mattradd 40 Reviews 422 reads
posted

Trump accuses, first Obama, and now Rice of crimes.

http://www.rawstory.com/2017/04/trump-declining-to-provide-evidence-says-thinks-obama-adviser-rice-committed-crime-nyt/

He weights in on whether or not Bill O'Reilly is guilty of charges involving sexual harassment; saying he believes Bill hasn't done anything wrong.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/donald-trump-bill-oreilly-harassment_us_58e51f1ee4b0917d347635f9?

Yet, when Obama weighed in regarding what he believed happened between a police officer and a college professor, in his own home, the righties here were up in arms, claiming he should have kept his nose out of it.

How does that work? Why their moral outrage then, and none now? ;)

Being the President of the United States should cause some refrain from speaking out about cases that may come before a judge. President Obama was wrong to speak out about Skip Gates and Trump is equally wrong to speak out about the cases you cite.

TwoMints124 reads

He's not allowed to have an opinion?  Guess what after seeing what she said, how she lied about not knowing first then claiming some other nonsense, I don't doubt she likely acted criminally.  She's a serial Liar. I don't doubt for a second she wasn't using that information for political purposes.  She wasn't investigating anything. She has no role in an investigation. She doesn't write the PDB, she just reads it.  She has almost zero reason to ask for an unmasking. Do you think she's part of the FBI?  That she's going to have some superior understand of intelligence?    

Again it's Trumps opinion. People settle this kind of thing all the time. He probably did it. That doesn't mean he isn't a good person. Not that I care a wit about O'reilly.  Who cares.  

If I had a son...   Rushing his Holder down to Ferguson..  Well maybe that was just that racists call to go there himself...

Morals?  Go kill another batch of babies you ghouls.

Posted By: mattradd
Trump accuses, first Obama, and now Rice of crimes.  
   
 http://www.rawstory.com/2017/04/trump-declining-to-provide-evidence-says-thinks-obama-adviser-rice-committed-crime-nyt/  
   
 He weights in on whether or not Bill O'Reilly is guilty of charges involving sexual harassment; saying he believes Bill hasn't done anything wrong.  
   
 http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/donald-trump-bill-oreilly-harassment_us_58e51f1ee4b0917d347635f9?  
   
 Yet, when Obama weighed in regarding what he believed happened between a police officer and a college professor, in his own home, the righties here were up in arms, claiming he should have kept his nose out of it.  
   
 How does that work? Why their moral outrage then, and none now? ;)

The cartoon with a bloodhound hot on a trail. You righties are like the bloodhound on a hot trail when the person has a D behind their name, and they are viewed as guilty until proven innocent. However, you're the bloodhound, in the cartoon, who then gets a cold, and can't find a trail, when the person has an R behind their name.  ;)

It  actually works very well. Since you have to ask you clearly do not understand and cannot figure it out.
Therefore explaining to you even in the simplest of terms will not help you so go back to your nappy-poo.

You're Welcome

followme141 reads

that is how you and your lefty, lib pals get you information. you dream it up.

You're welcome

Register Now!