From Eli Lake, The Free Press,

And showing that filthy war criminal putin is just a paper tiger

The biggest losers here are Russia, Iran, Hezbolla and Hamas, none of which are our friends. The biggest gainers here (besides the Syrian people) are Israel and Turkey, both of whom are our allies.
This is clearly a gain for US foreign policy because Russia and Iran have both lost a ton of influence in the region.
So how in hell is this a humiliation for Biden? It's not.
This clown Lake is clearly a toxic partisan. And by showing his willingness to lap up this nonsense simply because it's anti-Biden and anti-Democrat, ChicKie has once again proven himself a complete partisan hack.

free press go "anti-Democrat."   This seems to me like a guy just making an honest observation of the reality of the situation.  

If our two biggest enemies have lost their position in Syria; if a dictator who has been their client has been toppled; if Israel is now stronger and more secure; if US and Israeli air forces bombed the shit out of Syria so the new Islamist government has no Air Force, Navy, chemical weapons and other gear, how in the world is that a humiliation for US policy or Biden?
This is simply a bizarre turning of reality on its head.

had backed the Assad government.  When it comes to foreign policy, there are very few things, if any, that Biden got right, not just as President, but throughout his political career.

Unless or until you provide some proof for this statement I will assume you just pulled it out of your ass (per usual) because you don't have anything factual to dispute my posts on this.

Why don't you prove it's not true? Since you have all the answers.

Biden sent American troops into Syria to keep the remnants of ISIS at bay?  Who does that help, except Assad?  Now Biden has to worry about getting them out.  Maybe if he gives them a lot of military hardware like he did the Taliban, they will let our troops leave with only a dozen or so casualties.  

It was actually Obama. Trump wanted to remove them but was convinced that would be a bad idea, so there were there during his ENTIRE TERM. Here's what Reuters has to say about it.
Time for CDL to take the L on this one and bring The SPOAT along with him.
"The U.S. military intervention in Syria began in 2014 with air strikes against the Islamic State jihadist group that had declared its rule over a third of Syria and Iraq.
An initially small contingent of U.S. special forces deployed to Syria, working with the SDF, fighting to drive Islamic State from areas it had captured in Syria's north and east.
Declaring the battle with Islamic State almost won, Trump announced in 2018 he wanted to pull out U.S. troops.
But the plan was softened within a year after facing criticism for leaving a void that Iran and Russia would fill.
U.S. forces remain in Syria and continue to support the SDF.
U.S. military positions and personnel in northeastern Syria remain essential to ensuring Islamic State can never resurge, U.S. Ambassador Robert Wood told the Security Council on Dec. 3.
U.S. troops are also stationed at Syria's Tanf garrison near the intersection of the borders of Jordan and Iraq, where they support a Syrian rebel force to counter Islamic State in the area.
Assad's government views the U.S. forces as occupiers.
About 900 US troops are currently in the country, mostly in the northeast."
In other words the US troops were NOT there to prop up Assad. They have been in the far Southeast of the country and not near any territory controlled by Assad. He didn't give a fuck about them. He was focused on the North of his country.

It’s clear he didn’t read the piece, which went back to Obama foreign policy in the Middle East, specifically the decision to appease Iran for the sake of the nuclear deal.

And if my memory serves me correctly, Biden is STILL the commander-in-chief.   If he didn't support having American troops in Syria, they wouldn't be there.  They are clearly NOT assisting the rebels, so Assad is the beneficiary of them keeping ISIS in check, although it's a moot point now that Assad has fled.  I'm sure Biden said something to Assad about not thanking him publicly for keeping ISIS away from the capital, wink, wink.  

You didn't SAY Biden supported "having American troops in Syria." You said he put them there. He didn't.
And Assad was not "the beneficiary" of them keeping ISIS in check. The main beneficiary has been Iraq, which suffered greatly under ISIS. And I sincerely doubt Assad has ever even talked to Biden let alone thanked him.
CDL will say almost anything to avoid taking the L. Even when he's lost.

…another Middle East country getting taken over by Islamic extremists like the ones who flew planes into buildings is a win for Biden, the USA or the West generally. Especially given how many Muslim extremists now live in the West, including the USA, thanks to woketard leftists who couldn’t figure out that terrorism was a bad thing.

still can SOUND convincing.  Time for school.  There is no military theatre in the world where Americans are stationed overseas for four years.  The typical "tour" of duty is one to two years.   If it's a base of an ally, such as Germany or Japan, it will be two years.  If it's a combat zone, typically 12-15 months.  I guaranfuckingteeyou that there have been no troops within the last two years that were sent there by Trump.  Troops are rotated through areas where there is action, which means Biden could have stopped the flow anytime he wanted to, but he didn't.  He kept SENDING fresh troops to replace the ones who had finished their tour.  

USA continues to turn situations into worse crap shows. Not a lot of hope that this will turn out better. In Syria now the purge killings are amping up. One slaughter after another.

based on a meaningless "distinction" about the length of a tour. I really wonder if you have any clue how transparent you are. Possibly it's a result of your desperate attempt to continue avoiding taking the L you so richly have earned.
You are the King of "distinction without a difference."
Enjoy your stay in the Land of Denial.
Sorry, but the L is tatooed on your forehead.

How in the world did ChicKie invent the idea that I hate "to admit" "that Assad is gone?" In fact, I'm very happy he's gone. But keep making stuff up, ChicKie.

except your full of shit ... again...

The Middle East has long been defined by complex conflicts, yet pride of place is likely Syria since the outbreak of the civil war in 2011. U.S. forces, operating there since 2014, officially against the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL), are involved in one of the more perplexing elements of that conflict.

I definitely didn’t mean to say Nicky hates to admit that Assad is gone. When that comma is dropped you get to my actual intent, that Nicky hates to admit that Assad is gone at the hands of Erdogan and BiBi, not Biden (AKA “The Big Guy”).

I will stipulate that I can't stand Bibi and am not a big fan of Erdogan either. But that does NOT mean I hate to admit they played a large role in getting rid of Assad. That is simply a rational view of the facts, something all too lacking among our large claque of political hacks.

I always take a rational view of the facts. So nothing has changed.  But ChicKie is only able to perceive "progress" when someone agrees with him.

claiming Biden has not sent any troops to Syria.  Glad to straighten you out on that point.  You got crushed on that one, and yet, you still think you won.  Who's in denial.    

You did NOT prove "Biden HAS sent troops." You failed utterly.  So you had to fall back on a technicality that troops had to be rotated in and out and you called that "sending them." All this while evading the fact that Obama originally sent them and Trump KEPT them there (after saying he wouldn't), as did Biden.
In a career of embarrassing and fact-free posts, this is one of your most ludicrous ever. Talk about being in denial.

right now, save the ones that Biden sent.  Look it up, the Army does not post soldiers overseas for four years.  All tours abroad are shorter.  Obama's military response to ISIS, who he described as the JV team while they were beheading Americans was an embarrassment.  Are you sure you want to go there?  Even if you do, the same thing applies.  There are NO troops there that were sent by Obama unless they are on a second tour sent by Biden.   Show me anywhere since WWII where a solder has been posted overseas for more than two years continuously.   (There is a provision for 36 months when your family accompanies you to the foreign posting, but all postings to Syria are unaccompanied, with a 24-month OR LESS, max.  Who wants to settle their family in Syria for three years unless they REALLY hated their wife and kids?  Lol)

You are now simply repeating your idiotic, non-germane technicalities that have ZERO to do with the fact that all THREE past Presidents supported having troops there. But only Trump said he'd pull them out and then failed to do so.
Your inability to understand or take your well-deserved L on this shows what a complete buffoon you are.
Take the last word if you need it but it won't change that fact that you've utterly failed. I'm done here.

taught us when he took office is that no incoming President has to continue the policies of his predecessor.   The fact that Biden elected to keep sending replacement troops to Syria was his call, not in deference to Trump, who he despised and took affirmative steps to eliminate most of Trump's policies.   There would have been a discussion at some point in Biden's presidency with the Pentagon on whether to draw down the force in Syria that was left from the Trump administration.   Otherwise, they would have all rotated home and there would be no one left there today.  THAT is the procedure within the military.  The withdrawal in Vietnam began the same way, as soldiers finished their tours and rotated home, no replacements were sent, so the fighting force in-country diminished significantly over the space of a year.  Biden SENDING replacements under his watch was the ONLY way to keep troop levels the same in Syria.  I don't know why that is so hard for you to understand.  I'm any other ex-military guys here understand the process and may have been involved in rotations one place or another.

Iran isn’t our friend? Since when? Your BFF SJB has been harder on our best ally Israel than Iran. “Free” cash. Unimpeded access to world oil markets. Allowing the massive funding and equipping of malign Mideast actors (Hamas, the Houthis, Hezbollah etc) on and on and on. Your guy SJB had his tongue so far up the ayatollah’s ass the tip popped out of his ear.  

Now filthy maga traitor cunts are lying your little cunt asses off and saying Biden is/was supporting Iran?  What a shit for brain moron. Iran is our mortal enemy, just like filthy war criminal putin

Don’t suppose you read my post did you? If Iran is was our mortal enemy why did remove oil and banking sanctions on our “mortal enemy?” Why haven’t we taken out their nuke program if they’re our “mortal enemy?” Snowflake.

Killing the Iran nuclear deal was one of Trump's biggest failures
Six years after the US withdrew from the JCPOA, prospects for its resurrection are dim and Tehran is closer than ever to a bomb

they may accelerate their nuke program. Then we'll what Trump does.