Politics and Religion

Romney doesn't mind being perceived as a bad husband...
mattradd 40 Reviews 217 reads
posted
1 / 24

Talking about others vs. the issue addressed.

Oop!!! I better be careful or you'll joking about hunting me down and shooting me. lol Perhaps you were just PUI!  ;)

mattradd 40 Reviews 2882 reads
posted
2 / 24

It's a though call, but I would have liked to hear his wife's response to his remark! And, his response in return! ;)

dncphil 16 Reviews 307 reads
posted
3 / 24

Almost as stupid as the promise that no illegal aliens would be covered under ObamaCare.  

Does anyone believe that???????


Of course, your lies are okay.
Want more?

Posted By: mattradd
It's a though call, but I would have liked to hear his wife's response to his remark! And, his response in return! ;)

NeedleDicktheBugFucker 22 Reviews 325 reads
posted
4 / 24

so their drones never hear about them.

Hear no evil, see no evil.

Oh yeah, Romney is terrible, he sucks dick. Happy laffy?

BigPapasan 3 Reviews 296 reads
posted
5 / 24

...("I don't know what my wife is doing and I don't give a shit either") as long as he becomes President.

dncphil 16 Reviews 298 reads
posted
6 / 24

OP groused about RM lying, and I just gave a bigger lie on the other side.  

While it is true that you never address what I mentioned, it is rather articulate.  "righties bitch...," pussy ... loose shit."

Kind of a vulgar version of Turrett's syndrome with a political bent.

I can respond equally rationally:  You pussy as libs spout shit and bitch and crap in your hands."

Posted By: Laffy
Also, you just did what you Righties BITCH about CONSTANTLY:


If you put up a thread ripping Obama and someone replies with, "But what about Mitt when......" you guys lose your SHIT with, "Stop diverting!!!!  Only you pussy LIBERALS try to change the subject.  You HAVE to address the Obama thing I mentioned and STOP TRYING TO CHANGE THE SUBJECT you LOSER!!!"

Of course, that is EXACTLY what you Righties do in every......and I mean EVERY thread.....ripping Righties.  You completely ignore what was said and start whining about Obama/liberals.

Righties = what they hate

mattradd 40 Reviews 253 reads
posted
7 / 24

Of course, if you're supporting Romney, I can see where your sense of humor may be frayed!!!  ;)

mattradd 40 Reviews 181 reads
posted
8 / 24

You make the assumption that one who posts from Huffington Post or the Daily Kos does not read, listen to, or watch any other sources of news.  Stupid, stupid, stupid assumption!  ;)

NeedleDicktheBugFucker 22 Reviews 240 reads
posted
9 / 24

I did'nt say someone like you who sources, what, 80-90% of your posts from huffypo does'nt get info anywhere else.

What I said was that huffypo and dailykook don't aggressively cover Obama "lies/gaffes" etc like they do with Romney and Republicans...Case in point, the cavilier attitude expressed about the illegal coordination between Obama and his "superpacs".

From what I've seen, as much whining and complaining proggies do about "Faux News", (a sure tell you're dealing with a talking pointer zombie), they are blind about their own dependancy of huffypo and dailykoo to get their own thoughts.:D

-- Modified on 8/9/2012 9:49:45 AM

GaGambler 320 reads
posted
10 / 24

of course it's a very small step, but what do you expect from someone with the name Mattgina?

Just like nuguy is better than liorr, but only marginally so.

NeedleDicktheBugFucker 22 Reviews 220 reads
posted
12 / 24

obama till he stated it publically.

which targets he chooses to go after vs those he ignores, where he sources his OP's, that was all coincidence....nothing should be assumed from that...a more astute assumption finder there has never been than matty......Mr Enigma.

NeedleDicktheBugFucker 22 Reviews 236 reads
posted
14 / 24

course the fact your last several OP's were huffypo articles means nothing at all.

it would be completely crazy to draw an inference from that, right????

GaGambler 250 reads
posted
15 / 24

I literally roflmfao

That's even richer that Pri claiming to be P&R's "most objective poster" but at least we all now that Pri is just "joshing us" I really believe that Mattgina was stupid enough to think that someone might actually believe him.

it's pretty fucking simple, to quote huffpo or the DailyKook, first of all you have to read them, and anyone who reads either of them regularly is either a masochist or a die hard lib.

mattradd 40 Reviews 234 reads
posted
16 / 24

For you a Gag's benefit, are you saying that one can not dislike Romney and be an Independent???

-- Modified on 8/9/2012 10:31:35 AM

NeedleDicktheBugFucker 22 Reviews 265 reads
posted
17 / 24

or are you simply doing what you criticize others for?

nice try at putting words in my mouth, now i know why you love laffy.

mattradd 40 Reviews 270 reads
posted
18 / 24



"matty's such an enigma..no one had a clue he was voting for"obama till he stated it publically.

which targets he chooses to go after vs those he ignores, where he sources his OP's, that was all coincidence....nothing should be assumed from that...a more astute assumption finder there has never been than matty......Mr Enigma."

You're weaseling again!!!

GaGambler 247 reads
posted
19 / 24

You are so far from independent, you might as well be a mirror image to nuguy, except for the fact that you use complete sentences. You even seem to accept Daffy, which puts you in a minority of two, only you and salonpas are so devoid of independent thought that you are willing to suffer a troll like him, just because he shares your loathing of ANYTHING the least bit conservative.

mattradd 40 Reviews 236 reads
posted
20 / 24

spouting off Republican talking points, have voted for Democrats.

And, because I don't like Romney doesn't mean I'm not Ian Independent, and you thinking I don't appear so, doesn't make your perception true, particularly since you are partisan on the Republican side.

And, yes, as far as laffy goes, I just see him mirroring what those on the right having been doing along, though perhaps a notch or two up, just to make his point. Denial is not a river in Egypt, but it's flowing strong and deep for those, on the right, who can not see themselves in the mirror.  ;)

GaGambler 267 reads
posted
21 / 24

I'll go first, I voted for Bill Clinton, and  never regretted my vote for a minute.

OK, your turn.

mattradd 40 Reviews 264 reads
posted
22 / 24

state a local offices for me to play this game. I'm much more likely to vote Republican on those levels.

GaGambler 369 reads
posted
23 / 24

and more importantly, why did you vote for him.

and in the interest of fair play, I will go first again.

I voted for Clinton because number one, I didn't think he was doing too bad a job, but more importantly because it looked pretty certain like the GOP was going to control Congress, and as I have stated before, i don't trust either party to be in complete control. Plus, i really didn't see too much difference between Dole and Clinton, they were both pretty moderate.

Truth be told, I would take either Dole or Clinton today, and I can't even remember if Dole is even still alive. He must be around 90 if he's still alive, but I'd still take him over either Obama or Romney, I'd vote for his wife over either of those two to tell the truth.

-- Modified on 8/9/2012 4:11:42 PM

mattradd 40 Reviews 287 reads
posted
24 / 24

Felt Bush had much more over Dukakis when it came to national security and foreign policy. Had no trouble with "Read my lips! No, new taxes!" Nor, did I have a problem with him in raising taxes, because he placed the good of the country over ideology. I'm with you regarding Clinton and Bob and Elizabeth Dole, though I doubt either of the latter two could get the nomination today. I would have voted for Colin Powell and Chuck Haggar if they'd ran. Like I mentioned else where, career service people lead colorful lives, which are difficult to pass the vetting process.

Register Now!