Politics and Religion

Voices of Iraq
RLTW 8073 reads
posted
1 / 9

Voices of Iraq  
By Joel Mowbray
FrontPageMagazine.com | October 29, 2004

Two former MTV producers have accomplished what the entire mainstream media thus far has not: they’ve captured the real life and times of the Iraqi people.

They didn’t do it alone, however.  Producers Eric Manes and Martin Kunert sent 150 digital cameras into Iraq this April with very simple instructions: “Videotape your neighborhood, shopping area, where you live and work, pray, relax, and play” and interview “people who have the most meaning in your life.”

The cameras were passed on to friends and family members, and the handheld devices eventually made their way to the Shia south and later to the Kurdish north.  Thousands of Iraqis turned in over 450 hours of footage, and the results surprised even Manes and Kunert.

The finished product, Voices of Iraq, is a taut 75-minute documentary, opening today in limited release in ten cities.  (For listings, click here.)  Infused throughout with an Iraqi hip-hop soundtrack, the briskly edited film is hands-off in letting ordinary Iraqis drive the storyline.  That it won’t realistically have much of an impact on the election is the only disappointing thing about this film.

Groundbreaking and instantly compelling, VOI is sort of the anti-Michael Moore film.  There’s no narration, no heavy-handed editing.  And whereas the man from Flint started with his premise and assembled his film to support it, the only goal when making VOI was to emulate the producers’ trailblazing MTV show Fear, which gave cameras to everyday youths who filmed themselves at supposedly haunted locations.  Defying expectations, the show was a hit.

Not knowing what to expect, the producers partnered with actor and Gulf War veteran Archie Drury, who personally distributed cameras in Iraq this April.  When they started getting back initial footage not long after, the situation was less than ideal, yet nowhere near as bleak as the media portrayed.

Life in Iraq is normal.  Maybe not normal by American or European standards, but certainly for a country barely out from under the thumb of a bloodthirsty tyrant.  

Throughout VOI, kids are seen being kids: laughing, playing, teasing, roughhousing.  Iraqis are seen being silly: an adolescent boy doing what could only be described as a strange solo dance, an actor who filmed himself taking a shower, and policemen making bizarre sound effects and goofy faces.  And boys being boys: young men returning to college last month hitting on pretty girls with lame come ons, such as “The most beautiful girl, come here” and “Come here, I just want to talk to you.”

Interspersed with that were painful reminders of Iraq’s all-too-recent savage history, including former victims of Saddam’s torture having a conversation over dinner and video of Shia in the south recovering skeletal remains from mass graves.  Though a few longed for the “stability” and “security” of Saddam’s regime, no one seen in VOI was under any delusions about the despot.

During Saddam’s pretrial hearing, Iraqis were shooting in celebration, and one man talked about how he danced when he heard the news of the tyrant’s capture.  

Iraqis’ elation at Saddam’s demise should not come as a surprise.  The most chilling moments of the film were four brief clips from official Fedayeen (Saddam’s paramilitary) videotape footage: a blindfolded and handcuffed man thrown from the top of a building, falling to his death; a boy’s hand being chopped off; two blindfolded young men, boys really, sitting on a bomb as it detonates; and a beheading.  

Lasting no more than 15 seconds and completely silent, those images will haunt even the most jaded for days.

This side of evil, the real enemy of VOI is the mainstream media.  Armed with footage that somehow eluded the multimillion-dollar big news operations, the $500,000 film occasionally throws up newspaper headlines—only to show how woefully wrong they were.

From the movie:

“We can’t walk on the street anymore...” quoting the Newsweek bureau chief, 4/13/04, which is placed over images of Iraqis casually strolling down the street.
“Fear of Militants Forces Ordinary Iraqis to Stay Home,” San Francisco Chronicle, 5/16/04—over video of Iraqis packed into an outdoor marketplace.
“Iraq may survive, but the dream is dead,” New York Times, 5/7/04, which is seen over footage of wedding celebrants jumping for joy, and followed by shots of exuberant youths rejoicing their college graduation.

Iraqis are nobody’s fools.  They are far savvier and more sophisticated than most would realize, particularly the paternalistic, peacenik left, which thought Iraqis were better off under Saddam.  VOI has ordinary Iraqis talking about Saddam’s commonly-known harboring of al Qaeda operatives and how foreign governments don’t want Iraq’s democracy to succeed and are thus helping funnel terrorists into the country.

The Iraqi people understand democracy, but more important, they want democracy.  Who knows exactly what form or shape their eventual government will take, but if the ordinary folks featured in VOI have any say, it will be a free society.  Throughout, Iraqis define freedom as having a secular government, freedom of speech, or the freedom to partake in technological pleasures like the Internet and cell phones.

For those who read the above and want to label the project a partisan hack job without ever seeing it, many in VOI’s team are Democrats.  (What else would you expect from Hollywood types?)  And there are several scenes where Iraqis express diametrically opposing views.

That politics was being openly discussed—on camera, no less—is perhaps the greatest indicator of how much times have changed.

One extended scene showed nuanced political disagreements within one family, spats not that unlike what one would find inside a typical American household.  The clan’s pre-teen son, Hasooni, bright and smiling, lacked any confusion or inner conflict, though.

When asked what he “wants to be in the future,” Hasooni exclaims, “American.”

MrSelfDestruct 44 Reviews 8189 reads
posted
2 / 9

"For those who read the above and want to label the project a partisan hack job without ever seeing it, many in VOI’s team are Democrats.  (What else would you expect from Hollywood types?)"

That sure sounds like a non-partisan statement to me.  You KNOW those Hollywood types!

Here's a review from Jonathan Curiel is the SF Chronicle (yes, the LIBERAL SF Chronicle):

‘Voices of Iraq’
Documentary. Produced by Eric Manes, Archie Drury and Martin Kunert. (Not rated. 80 minutes. At the Opera Plaza.)

Do the producers of this film have an agenda to show a more positive side of Iraq? Do they want to give evidence that the U.S.-led war in Iraq, despite the abuses at Abu Ghraib and the deaths of Iraqi civilians, is at least preferable to the reign of Saddam Hussein? These questions are open to debate, but one thing is clear: “Voices of Iraq” shows Iraqi society in all its complexity — one of the first times that a theatrically released documentary has ever done that. For this reason alone, “Voices of Iraq” is a must-see for anyone still coming to terms with the chaos in Iraq.

Nearly all the footage was taken by Iraqis who were handed video equipment, and nearly all the footage was taken within the past six months. The project happened when three U.S. producers (including one who created MTV’s “Fear” reality series) gave 150 digital video cameras to everyday people who live in Baghdad, Kirkuk and other Iraqi cities. More than 1,500 Iraqis took videos of their lives. We see a children’s birthday party where adults and youngsters are happily celebrating. We see students at Baghdad University rushing off to classes, flirting, talking about their future. We see a young man in a rock band playing drums and rapping. But we also see the aftermath of car bombings, we hear Iraqis say their country is less safe than it was under Hussein, and we meet a young girl named Farah who was shot in the arm and stomach by U.S. soldiers.

“Voices of Iraq” has conflicting viewpoints — which is one of its strengths. Tucked into the film are videos, apparently made by Iraqi insurgents, who urge Arabs to attack U.S. soldiers. These are juxtaposed with video, apparently made by Hussein’s son Uday, that show extreme torture of Iraqi prisoners. Some Iraqis claim that the Abu Ghraib prison abuse was tame compared with what they endured under Hussein.

There are certainly indications that “Voices of Iraq” is an attempt to counteract “Fahrenheit 9/11” and other anti-war documentaries. The movie’s Web site names the production company as “Voices of Freedom, LLC.” The conservative Washington Times newspaper has written that the film is a “potent negation” of anti-war views held by Michael Moore and Noam Chomsky. The Wall Street Journal, whose editorial pages lean right, has opined that “Voices of Iraq” “overwhelmingly (shows) signs of life and optimism” in Iraq. In an interview with The Chronicle, Archie Drury, one of the film’s three producers, acknowledges that the film “makes Bush look good” and that the producers selectively edited the Iraqis’ footage — but says the film’s main point is to “humanize” the Iraqi people.

Drury is a Democrat. As a Marine, he served in the first Persian Gulf war, where he got to know Iraqi children who walked up to his observation post. Anyone who has met Iraqis — whether it’s in Baghdad or Berkeley — knows they’re more than the images that air on the nightly news. “Voices of Iraq” gives us this more nuanced picture. It’s more upbeat than not, more hopeful than not. In a world where people often see things as either half full or half empty, this is a film that’s half full. It’s an approach that even the war’s harshest critics should find interesting.

Advisory: This film has occasional rough language, scenes of people with bullet scars and extremely disturbing footage of prisoner torture.

— Jonathan Curiel



RLTW 8051 reads
posted
3 / 9

No one has ever stated that Iraq is all sunshine and flowers. It seems that the purpose of the documentary is to provide insights into the lives of Iraqis. Insights that don't get presented through the filter of the mainstream media. An alternative viewpoint presented for people to view and draw their own conclusions. The mainstream media relies too heavily on bad news and sensational headlines to sell stories.

As far as the Hollywood statement goes, can anyone seriously argue that "Hollywood Types" are not predominately Democrats? It's not a bad thing, it's just the truth.

RLTW

MrSelfDestruct 44 Reviews 7707 reads
posted
4 / 9

"The mainstream media relies too heavily on bad news and sensational headlines to sell stories"

I doubt alternative media is free of this...it just caters to a smaller audience, so it can be more niche oriented.

I wouldn't know about the "Hollywood" types...I don't hang with them and take polls.  The only Hollywood people I have known are on TER. :)

AllHailTheBaloneySandwich 6836 reads
posted
5 / 9
GOPGeezer 2 Reviews 7395 reads
posted
6 / 9
zinaval 7 Reviews 7837 reads
posted
7 / 9

"There’s no narration, no heavy-handed editing.  And whereas the man from Flint started with his premise and assembled his film to support it, the only goal when making VOI was to emulate the producers’ trailblazing MTV show Fear, which gave cameras to everyday youths who filmed themselves at supposedly haunted locations."

"'We can’t walk on the street anymore...' quoting the Newsweek bureau chief, 4/13/04, which is placed over images of Iraqis casually strolling down the street.
"'Fear of Militants Forces Ordinary Iraqis to Stay Home,' San Francisco Chronicle, 5/16/04—over video of Iraqis packed into an outdoor marketplace.
"'Iraq may survive, but the dream is dead,' New York Times, 5/7/04, which is seen over footage of wedding celebrants jumping for joy, and followed by shots of exuberant youths rejoicing their college graduation."

That sounds a heavy handed and narrated to me.  Granted, the film-makers weren't Michael Moore but that doesn't mean they didn't have an agenda.    

Relax though.  Directed video and cinema are manipulative by their very nature.

BTW, as though weddings weren't celebrated in NY while Sherman closed on Atlanta?  A bad and worsening situation in Iraq doesn't mean a dreadful life everywhere.

/Zin



-- Modified on 10/31/2004 12:37:01 AM

RLTW 6338 reads
posted
8 / 9

I didn't write that article Zin. I merely posted it as a topic of interest. Not sure how I can contradict something I never wrote.

RLTW

Register Now!