Politics and Religion

Request for transparency?
cks175 51 Reviews 188 reads
posted
1 / 11

“I would appreciate it if you would explain your philosophy on transparency as it appears to be based solely on political advantage”

cks175 51 Reviews 8 reads
posted
2 / 11

Grenell’s declassification served the interests of the public and will help deter the IC from illegally spying on Americans in the future.

cks175 51 Reviews 10 reads
posted
3 / 11

they were compromised when the Obama Administration leaked the Kislyak call.  The cat was already out of the bag, my friend. Just because some paid hack goes on MSDNC and regurgitates Democratic talking points, it doesn’t make it true.

The declassification of the unmasking memos most certainly was for the public good, and will help to secure our 4th Amendment rights.

Once-Is-Not-Enough 7 reads
posted
4 / 11

Very interesting.  This would be a good time for you to, honestly share, your view of the lack of transparency in the Trumpty dumpty white house.

 
I would appreciate it if YOU would explain, for the benefit of those, who are not in the know.  You're on.

cks175 51 Reviews 6 reads
posted
5 / 11

All administrations have misused the classification system for invalid purposes.  Grenell’s declassification of purely political documents is a step in the right direction.  I would hope that any administration after Trump’s (be that 2020 or 2024), follows suit.

Once-Is-Not-Enough 7 reads
posted
6 / 11

making an attempt.  But if you reread my post, you will find my humble request was much more specific than that.

 
Did you dodge it intentionally, or did you fail to read it thoroughly?  Giving you the benefit of the doubt here.

cks175 51 Reviews 5 reads
posted
7 / 11

Your request wasn’t specific, it was broad. I limited my response to the topic at hand, declassification of unmasking.

If you feel your request is worthy of a broad answer, I would suggest you create a topic thread that falls within those parameters.

Once-Is-Not-Enough 8 reads
posted
8 / 11

Go ahead, hide under your bed.  You have revealed yourself for all to see.

 
Shame on me for giving you the benefit of the doubt.  Clearly, you did NOT deserve it.  Will not make the same mistake with you again.

cks175 51 Reviews 6 reads
posted
9 / 11

If transparency is so important to you, open a thread. You lame attempt at hijacking this one is noted.

Once-Is-Not-Enough 9 reads
posted
10 / 11

Put or shut up.  You had a chance to reply.  My post was DIRECTED at YOUR reply.  Go ahead and run away like a sacred little girl.

cks175 51 Reviews 26 reads
posted
11 / 11

of individuals who sought to unmask the identity of General Flynn poses absolutely no risk of disclosure of either sources or methods”

But Laffy watches MSNBC and he believes otherwise.

Register Now!