was funny.  It was the one about Exxon Mobil and how they are concerned about the environment. Those lefties  on SNL really are funny at times.

The NJ Turnpike between Exits 12 thru 16 is nicknamed "Cancer Stretch" where all the oil refineries are located.   Oh well wait for the Papa Trumpanazee and his warriors over regulations dismantle the EPA and inspections of Chemical plants.

You are the King of hyperbolic BS.  The sky isn't falling and we're going to be ok.  

Aren't there regulations(laws) in regard to opiate sales and gun violence? Where are the environmentalists, when there are people actually being killed right in front of their face? People are a component of the environment.

Exxon Valdez oil spill  in Alaska was no BS.  You are the master of evasive one liners that make you a jackass with a meat head!

Jeez.  The hyperbolic BS is your alluding to two real disasters and implying Trump's going to make it happen tomorrow.

Libberish.

Consists solely of being the managing general partner of an Oklahoma AAA minor league baseball team.
Yeah, that's the ticket! LMAO!

Libberish.

It is quite clear the "actual management experience" you were talking about was in the private sector.  And everything you just cited was in the government.
Trump does have people in his government with business management experience but Pruitt ain't one of them.

By comparison Pruitt is grossly OVER qualified.  

I was NOT making the case that such experience was necessary, TwoMints was.  Here's what he said:
"When you put people with actual management experience into these agencies you will see a lot of structural changes to the management.  When companies restructure, they rarely cut the bottom level people. Those are the people actually working. They restructure management, reduce redundancies and streamline the entire system. Of course all these middle to upper management types are shitting their pants. Many may well be looking for new jobs.  All levels of government needs these reforms."
My reply simply pointed out in response that Pruitt had very little business management experience, which TwoMints comment above clearly referred to.
So you either didn't read the thread when you decided to weigh in OR you are just doing one of your deceptive deflections.  Which is it?

If it was anyone else but you I would totally agree with you Jake. But then you've already decreed you have no use for what I think.

and he will chase you right off the right edge of the page telling you exactly that. Or until you get sick of debating the subject, whichever comes first. lol

He doesn't give a fuck what anyone thinks but himself. But it IS easy to see when he's at a loss for words.

In fact, the one who provided no rebuttal is the one up whose ass you have your tongue -- GaGa.  Here is your assignment: go back and read the branch again and report back to your class of Remedial English Comprehension 101.  
PS: It is not true that I don't "give a fuck what anyone thinks but himself."  I just don't give a fuck what YOU think.

Just as predicted, Jake you are so predictable and easy it almost takes the fun out of being right

I take that as abject capitulation on your part.  Don't be embarrassed.  It really was your only option.  Especially with dolts like ed trying to help you.  It's as if Fancy jumped to your defense.

someone you can't stop thinking about and and can't stop criticizing even when they totally agree with you.

As in "Jake dominates ed because ed is an intellectual midget."  
You meant to say "dominant."  As in "Jake is dominant in any discussion with ed because Jake is wise and ed is a dolt."
Stick with me, ed. You might learn something.  Like how to communicate more intelligently.
Or not.

You're moving in the wrong direction there.

The potential for BOTH matt AND jake falling off the margin IN THE SAME BRANCH of a thread. You've both been, there just not together. Unlike jake, I know matt can recognize what that abyss looks like but I wonder if he and jake will join hands and skip over the cliff together. . . à la Thelma and Louise.

That was a rhetorical question.