You say that we have adopted socialiast programs into our society, citing public schools, pplice departments, fire departments, ect.
The fact that something is "public" does not mean it is an aspect of socialism.
Socialism generally refers to state ownership of businesses, not all services. In every society in history there were public police deparments, armies, public officials. But those weren't examples of socialism.
Hopefully the banks will be temporary. We "bailed out" Chrysler, the Goverenment made money, and then no longer was involved in the company. It was a temporary measure in an emergency.
Let me give you one quick example of why Obama's tax relief will hurt everybody. My best friend is a personal trainer. He owns a small gym. A lot of his clients train with him twice a day at $75 per session. For those of his clients in the income range of $250,000, if their taxes increase 5,000 per year, they may see what "luxuries" they can cut down on.
My friend is one of the first things they will drop.
There are tens of thousands of small businesses that will lose much of their business. Coffee places, hair dressers, interior decorators, ballet teachers, waiters, pet sitters, trainers, and groomer, are just a few of the businesses that I have some knoweldge about that depend on "rich" peoples' "mad money."
Finally, you ask why there is such demonizing of other ideas. For 8 years the terms "Nazi,"
"totalitarian," "dictator," "facist," and "tyranical" have been applied to the GOP. Suddenly, the word "socialist" appears and everyone does a "Gosh, why do we use such nasty words?" Maybe if people had stopped with the hyperbole six years ago, we wouldn't be here today.
To the extent that Obama wants to spread wealth, the word socialist is more accurate that is the word "Nazi" when used with Bush.