What's the deal with all the illegals here.  In my area of DC THE local ads are full of folks who cant even post ads in English ( I am native Spanish speaker by parents).  I must say it's annoying and they are effecting the local and traveling American girls.

And variety/selection higher.
While it might be tempting to call ICE after a  bad session or an importi s encroaching on another SWs client base, not good for the industry in the long run.  

It's ironic that you're calling out providers for not being proficient in English but you seem to struggle with making a clear point.  
I'm not sure whether this belongs on the P&R board, whether you've failed to consult provider sites that have lots of Yankee gals, or even how you've deduced that these women are here illegally (mangling the English language is a Universal problem and not reserved to "illegals").  
FWIW, here in the City of Angels, we're flush with beautiful women from all over the globe, either directly or by heritage.  Makes for some awesome P4P.

Others have noted that it’s hard to sort out through an ad and figure out who is undocumented or not.  But what we do know is that stage one of Trump’s immigration plan will be directed at criminal aliens and the cartels. I would assume this would put a dent in the number of women trafficked by the cartels.  Later on, they’ll be trying to track down visa overstays. This could impact the number of foreign born providers available to us, but who knows to what degree?

Everyone can enjoy the wide variety of ethnicities available in the US,  esp in metro areas  

I wish I could think of even one American provider that was worth half of what she charged so I could even tap into the vibe you’re trying to spread here.  

And I really don't get it. I've been doing this since 1986 and have had almost entirely great experiences. Some of it because of TER and the info and the friendships I've had here.
Based on your complaints I think you need to review how you're making your choices and doing your homework.
Something is wrong with this picture.

I am not doubting your experiences at all, and I wont flame you, but your experiences are so vastly different from mine. I have classified my dates on these boards (and others) as either "good" or "great" about 95% of the time. I have likened seeing providers to eating pizza...even when it's "bad" it's still good. lol.  
.
I will echo Nickys thoughts by telling you I am sorry to hear of your bad experiences.

http://www.italki.com/en/post/question-111330
What do you call a person who can speak 3 languages? Trilingual.
What do you call a person who can speak 2 languages? Bilingual.
What do you call a person who can only speak 1 language? American.

...no exceptions!

They could have all sorts of legit visas:
tourist visa
student visa
student-spouse visa
H-1B job visa  
H-1B spouse visa
etc.
.
Some visas do not allow the visa-holder to take a job. Many of them do (I mean a "real" job, not a SW job). (E.g., I have known married couples where both held H-1B (work) visas. I have known married couples where one held the H-1B (work) visa and the spouse was not supposed to take a job; the spouse did find a job and earned more than the H-1B holder!  
.
I'm not an immigration expert but I think that if a visa holder commits a crime (a) they might flee the jurisdiction and go back to their home country (b) or if tried and convicted their visa is no longer valid and they get deported after serving their jail sentence.

A quick Google search puts estimates of illegal immigrant population somewhere over 11 million. In another thread, 2 million deportations a year was noted as a very ambitious, record breaking goal. So it’s going to take time to reduce the undocumented population. Do you have any thoughts on the OP’s question. Do you see Trump’s immigration goals impacting us here?

We should try to get it done before the mid terms. That’s 20 million in 730 days. Or 27,400 per day. A 727 can reasonably hold 140 passengers. That’s 196 flights a day. This should be easy to achieve since there’s 45,000 flights in US skies everyday.

I believe the largest number deported in one year occurred during the Obama administration, and that was less than one million. Hitting 10 million a year would be next to impossible.  Of course if they incentivize self deportation, that number MIGHT be achievable.

How old are you? The 727 first flew in 1967 and only a handful are still flying. Maybe you should rent this one. It's been converted into house in Costa Rica.

It's perched above one of the prettiest national parks in CR's Manuel Antonio.

It's usually one that was sold to some third-world country 20+ years ago.   The economics of flying them doesn't really justify the maintenance requirements to keep them flying, so a little scrimping here and patching-instead-of-replacing there, and they can make a little money until the inevitable crash happens.  Then the operator goes belly up.  

The B52 fleet is getting engine replacements along with new electronics to keep them in service for 30 more years, making them about 100 years old before they retire. The first flight was 1952 and entered service in 1955.

The 727
First flew February 9, 1963 not 1967 and entered service February 1, 1964.
And the last commercial passenger flight was January 2019. January 2019 was almost 6 years ago not decades ago. FYI a decade is 10 years.  

He failed to point out the 727's last commercial flight was in IRAN, which is so backward it's still flying lots of outdated airplanes.
From Meat's own link: "Iran Aseman Airlines, the last passenger airline operator, made the worldwide last scheduled 727 passenger flight on January 13, 2019 between Zahedan and Tehran."
In the US Meat's own link points out most US airlines phased out the 727 after 9/11. And, yes, that's more than 20 YEARS ago. Also, "As of July 2013, a total of 109 Boeing 727s were in commercial service with 34 airlines;[34] three years later, the total had fallen to 64 airframes in service with 26 airlines."
So SwallowMeat embarrasses himself AGAIN. His overwhelming need to attack me combined with his poor and sloppy reading skills make him play the fool.
An epic FAIL.
Sad.

palatable as a periodic side dish.  That's the way I keep my satisfaction level at 95%.  I think if you're seeing more indies than Kgirls and your satisfaction level is 95%, then your standards are much lower than mine, but if that works for you, keep it up.  It's all about the happiness of the person paying.

because 1) the military is not responsible to shareholders to turn a profit from its operations, and 2) there is nothing similar available in the way of a heavy long-range bomber already in the works, or being planned, to replace the B-52.  Retrofitting is a good idea when you don't have to consider profitability or progress.  

Yes, it's still good for a few roles, mainly where the defenses it faces are low tech and primitive. And it can carry a massive payload. But we have other newer and more capable bombers. There's the B1, a supersonic, swing-wing bomber from the Reagan area. Not to mention the B2 "stealth bomber" that can carry a MOAB and is undetectable. Last there's the B21:
"The B-21 Raider is the planned replacement for the U.S. Air Force's B-1 and B-2 strategic bombers:  
B-21 Raider
The B-21 is a sixth-generation aircraft that will gradually replace the B-1 and B-2 bombers. The B-21 is designed to be the backbone of the Air Force's global strike capability. It features advanced stealth and data-sharing capabilities, and an open systems architecture that allows it to incorporate new technologies quickly. The first B-21 began flight testing in November 2023 at Edwards Air Force Base in California.  
B-1 and B-2 bombers
The B-1 bombers date from the 1980s, and the B-2 bombers date from the 1990s. The Air Force plans to replace these bombers with at least 100 B-21s by 2040. However, a decision to produce more than 100 B-21s may not be made until the mid-2030s."