Politics and Religion

Re: What part of “impossible to verify” don’t you understand?
RespectfulRobert 475 reads
posted
1 / 25

Just kidding! But the voter fraud expert that Trump hired...let me repeat that....that TRUMP hired...couldnt find any instances of it actually happening! Someone call 911 for Willy asap please. lol
http://www.mediaite.com/politics/expert-chosen-by-trump-to-investigate-voter-fraud-allegations-says-he-proved-every-one-of-them-false/

inicky46 61 Reviews 112 reads
posted
2 / 25

Don't you know you're not allowed to mention his name or the righties here will go bat-shit crazy?
WAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHH!!!!!!!

willywonka4u 22 Reviews 95 reads
posted
3 / 25

I guess this news story just passed the lefties by. Too busy listening to Rachel Maddow tell us that Trump is going to murder her.

willywonka4u 22 Reviews 113 reads
posted
5 / 25

What do you see? Look, we were all supposed to vote behind a curtain so no one can influence us. It’s just our conscious and our vote. This had to be enacted into law because in the past employers would demand their employees to vote Republican as a condition of employment. That is why we vote in private. Now it’s perfectly fine for an elderly woman to ask for help from her son or daughter to cast a vote. But a poll worker should ensure that, and make sure it’s not their child using her parent to illegally cast 2 votes. When you have people voting from home and mailing them in with the Democrat party sending 20 ballots per house, then you have no means to verify a damn thing. And that’s how a guy who hid in his basement and couldn’t draw a crowd got more votes than Obama in 2008 when he was packing stadium after stadium. It was massive wide scale voter fraud and you know it.

BigPapasan 3 Reviews 86 reads
posted
6 / 25

"news" organization?  Really willy?   The only people stupid enough to believe that are your fellow dumbshit righties.  You really have contempt for your fellow righties, don't you willy?  You know that righties will believe anything a fellow righty posts as well as anything that comes out of  Trump's mouth.

 
The Heartland Institute is NOT a news organization.  It is a conservative think tank which worked with Phillip Morris throughout the 1990s to attempt to discredit the health risks of secondhand smoke and lobby against smoking bans.  The Heartland Institute also has been a leading promoter of climate change denial.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heartland_Institute

impposter 49 Reviews 127 reads
posted
7 / 25

Trump hired TWO independent research firms to look for fraud and they both reported their results DIRECTLY to Trump in December 2020, long before Jan 6. Trump, apparently, didn't want to accept the results of their investigations.
.
See sections of my older posts:  
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/politics-and-religion-39/re-you-guys-keep-using-the-same-tactic--431935
"15. The two private companies that Trump hired to look for fraud in the election were Simpatico Software Systems and Berkeley Research Group. Were they in cahoots with Biden?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2023/04/27/trump-false-election-fraud-claims/
A second firm hired by Trump campaign found no evidence of election fraud
"... Ken Block, founder of the firm Simpatico Software Systems, studied more than a dozen voter fraud theories and allegations for Trump’s campaign in late 2020 and found they were “all false." ... "No substantive voter fraud was uncovered in my investigations looking for it, nor was I able to confirm any of the outside claims of voter fraud that I was asked to look at,” he said. “Every fraud claim I was asked to investigate was false.” ..."
Should Trump demand a refund?"
.
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/politics-and-religion-39/re-willy-is-not-entirely-wrong-and-you-misunderstand-both-barr-and-the-election-lawsuits-433265
"Not mentioned in the wikipedia article was the fact that Trump hired TWO independent research firms to find election fraud. They found NONE and Trump kept their results secret.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/02/11/trump-campaign-report-electoral-fraud/
Trump campaign paid researchers to prove 2020 fraud but kept findings secret.
.
"... Senior officials from Berkeley Research Group briefed Trump, then-chief of staff Mark Meadows and others on the findings in a December 2020 conference call, people familiar with the matter said. Meadows showed skepticism of the findings and continued to maintain that Trump won. Trump also continued to say he won the election. The call grew contentious, people with knowledge of the meeting said. ..."
.
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/3977965-second-trump-hired-firm-found-2020-fraud-claims-were-all-false/
Second Trump-hired firm found 2020 fraud claims were ‘all false’.
"... The Trump campaign hired Simpatico Software Systems and its founder, Ken Block, to investigate fraud claims all over the country after the 2020 election. “No substantive voter fraud was uncovered in my investigations looking for it, nor was I able to confirm any of the outside claims of voter fraud that I was asked to look at,” he told the Post. “Every fraud claim I was asked to investigate was false.” ..."

Posted By: willywonka4u
Re: Really?
I guess this news story just passed the lefties by. Too busy listening to Rachel Maddow tell us that Trump is going to murder her.

willywonka4u 22 Reviews 101 reads
posted
8 / 25

…then you fault their methodology, not who conducted the poll, which last I checked, Rasmussen is a widely accepted polling organization.  

BTW, as I have demonstrated before on this page, climate change IS bullshit. CO2 emissions do NOT cause climate change. It is, in fact, impossible.

willywonka4u 22 Reviews 98 reads
posted
9 / 25

Suppose Willy has a box of stolen gold. I hide the box among a pile of boxes, arranged from “Pile A”, “Pile B”, “Pile C” and so on. If I hide the gold in Pile Z and an investigator only looks for the gold in piles A-F then does that mean I didn’t steal the gold, or does it mean that the investigators didn’t find it?

This is not that complicated Imp. The Democrats stole the election. They used ballot harvesting to do it. They sent out 20, 30, 40 ballots per household. No poll worker observed the ballots being cast. The ballots were mailed in. With millions of ballots cast it would be impossible to verify ballots to signatures. And now we have polling showing how it was likely done.  

And have you noticed the pattern? Whether it be 1/6 or the election or the origins of Covid or Ivermectin or the dangers of the vaccine, the Russia collusion hoax or Hunter Biden’s laptop being a Russian disinformation campaign, over and over and over again the evidence for the “conspiracy theorists” keeps on growing and the evidence for the official narrative keeps collapsing. The question is when do you stop ignoring the pattern?

inicky46 61 Reviews 92 reads
posted
10 / 25

Pile Z! Pile Z! Paging Pile Z!

-- Modified on 12/19/2023 9:43:40 AM

willywonka4u 22 Reviews 88 reads
posted
12 / 25

In order to prove anything, Trump would have to have proven that a certain percentage of the ballots were fraudulent and that those ballots cost him the election. This would have required an investigation into each ballot. This would have required 155 million investigations. An impossible task given the time constants. But it was no accident that Democrats flipped out about Trump considering closing down the Post Office just like every other federal agency was closed down, because if Trump had done so then the Democrats couldn’t have harvested the number of ballots needed to win. And this is why the Fraud came at 4 am. Democrats needed to know by how much Trump was winning to know by how much to pad the vote so Biden could “win”.

RespectfulRobert 91 reads
posted
13 / 25

It's the Trumpette responders to it who lied so silly fools like yourself could then use those bogus poll results to spread your totally fabricated conspiracy theories about "rigged elections." If 20% really did vote illegally, that would be super easy to prove in court as there would be examples all over the place, millions of them in fact, of these illegalities and yet not a court in the land saw any proof that the Trumpers said was coming.  
Trumps own people told him he lost. The idiots like Rudy and Jenna Ellis were drug into court and proven to be liars. Lindsey Graham asked the Trump camp to provide him the proof the election was rigged and they never did. Damn Willy, even the super far right Fox News has now acknowledged Trump lost fair and square.  
Best of all, Trumps hand picked expert in voter fraud said that he couldnt find ANY evidence of it anywhere as every lead the Trump camp sent him proved to be bogus....and yet with all that.... here you are.

RespectfulRobert 120 reads
posted
14 / 25

And you have NONE. Just ask Lindsey Graham.

willywonka4u 22 Reviews 85 reads
posted
15 / 25

You think Trump voters just lied about this to cement a conspiracy theory? How did they know that’s hownthe poll results would be interpreted? 😂😂😂

Next you’ll tell me that Biden keeps falling off bikes on purpose to show everyone how tough he is.

willywonka4u 22 Reviews 77 reads
posted
16 / 25

But this isn’t a court of law, this is just two people on a fuck board shooting the shit. And if I’m unable to conduct 155 million investigations, that’s just the way it is. But YOU cannot assert that 2020 was “the most fair and secure election in the history of ever”. That’s bullshit, and you know it’s bullshit.

What I can tell you is that election fraud has historically been detected mathematically. This is why exit polls are so important. Anyone with a better understanding of statistics than I can tell you what sample size you need to find the election result. And when you have an election for President where both candidates have very high negatives, then you’re going to get a low voter turnout. Add a fucking pandemic on top of that and you will have a pitiful turnout. And yet somehow Biden broke all goddamn records despite that he couldn’t draw a crowd and hid in his basement.

RespectfulRobert 121 reads
posted
17 / 25

What is more likely...that millions and millions of people voted illegally yet all of them went undetected by people with expertise in looking for them.... OR.... Joe was elected fairly and squarely like every other president. Give it some thought.

RespectfulRobert 77 reads
posted
18 / 25

Trump told his people NOT to use that method as he told them it was "rigged." Since the R candidate usually does better with the elderly, a group MUCH more likely to stay home on Election Day during Covid, he sealed his own fate which lead to his own demise.

willywonka4u 22 Reviews 85 reads
posted
19 / 25

When did the state legislatures approve that measure? They didn’t. And since 2020 several states have had to weigh in on if mail in voting violated their state’s constitution. Furthermore, mail in voting extended Election Day to a whole two months. Who decided this? The voters? The state legislatures? It’s one thing to vote absentee because you can’t be at the polls on election day. It’s quite another to cheat in order to pad the vote in your favor.

impposter 49 Reviews 108 reads
posted
20 / 25

There were multiple recounts all over the country. Famous cases:
.
1. Georgia - Republican Sec of State Raffensperger counted the GA votes, including a hand count, THREE TIMES. No outcome determinative fraud. 50,000 dead people voting? They found fewer than 12 such ballots. Etc. But I guess he's a RINO.
.
2. Arizona - Republicans controlled numerous recounts, including bringing in the Cyber Ninjas. Not having found any of the fraudulent ballots that Rudy and Powell and Kari Lake were screaming about, they even looked for proof of bamboo containing counterfeit Chinese ballots: zilch. After numerous recounts, they ended up finding more votes that INCREASED Biden's margin of victory. ... And Kari Lake has continued to lose every court case she has brought in her attempt to seize the Governorship of AZ. Lake lost by 17,000 votes and she has looked under every pile, from A to Z, and now she continues to search using the Greek alphabet to label Pile after Pile after Pile of bogus claims.
.
And so on for the other swing states and other whacko theories (Jewish Space Lasers switching votes; Italian satellites switching votes; ... WHY DID FOX PAY $787 Million to settle a lawsuit about promoting these and other FALSE CLAIMS about the election? Why didn't Fox spend a few million dollars to PROVE that there was fraud and avoid the larger settlement? BECAUSE THERE WAS NOTHING TO BE FOUND! There is no mysterious Pile Z!
.
See my previous post:
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/politics-and-religion-39/re-willy-is-not-entirely-wrong-and-you-misunderstand-both-barr-and-the-election-lawsuits-433272
http://www.minnpost.com/national/2023/03/the-bourne-conspiracy-how-a-minnesotans-email-became-key-evidence-in-fox-news-dominion-voting-systems-lawsuit/
The Bourne conspiracy: How a Minnesotan’s email became key evidence in Fox News-Dominion Voting Systems lawsuit.
"Sent just hours after Fox News called the election for Joe Biden, Minnesotan Marlene Bourne’s wild email falsely claimed “a piece of software” was inserted into Dominion voting machines that would change votes for Donald Trump to Biden."
.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/media/2023/03/16/sidney-powell-fox-news-dominion/
At center of Fox News lawsuit, Sidney Powell and a ‘wackadoodle’ email.
"A day after major news organizations declared Joe Biden the winner of the 2020 presidential race, a Sunday-morning guest on Fox News was holding forth on exotic and baseless claims of election fraud — allegedly deceased voters, ballots supposedly lacking an option to vote for Donald Trump, an “affidavit” from a postal worker claiming to have postdated mail-in ballots — when host Maria Bartiromo pressed for more details. ..."
.
"... One day later, though, Powell was back in front of Fox’s cameras, telling host Lou Dobbs that in Arizona, “there were 35,000 votes added to every Democrat candidate just to start their voting off. It’s like getting your $500 of Monopoly money to begin with when you haven’t done anything, and it was only for Democrats.” ..." [Anybody have any evidence of an extra 35,000 votes? Willy? Anyone? Nah, not me either.]
.
"Still, it is that very first post-election Powell appearance on Nov. 8 — and what has come to be known as the “wackadoodle” email said to have inspired some of the segment’s particularly specific and bizarre claims — that legal experts say might provide Dominion with some of its most potent evidence. ..."
.
Here is the 4-page wackadoodle email from the lawsuit evidence:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/documents/ac73ed35-fccd-45df-bc49-4e1a8cd4b37d.pdf?itid=lk_inline_manual_23&itid=lk_interstitial_manual_34

Posted By: willywonka4u
Re: What part of “impossible to verify” don’t you understand?
In order to prove anything, Trump would have to have proven that a certain percentage of the ballots were fraudulent and that those ballots cost him the election. This would have required an investigation into each ballot. This would have required 155 million investigations. An impossible task given the time constants. But it was no accident that Democrats flipped out about Trump considering closing down the Post Office just like every other federal agency was closed down, because if Trump had done so then the Democrats couldn’t have harvested the number of ballots needed to win. And this is why the Fraud came at 4 am. Democrats needed to know by how much Trump was winning to know by how much to pad the vote so Biden could “win”.
Marlene Bourne:

LostSon 43 Reviews 92 reads
posted
21 / 25

Posted By: RespectfulRobert
Re: Occams razor works in my favor, not yours.
What is more likely...that millions and millions of people voted illegally yet all of them went undetected by people with expertise in looking for them.... OR.... Joe was elected fairly and squarely like every other president. Give it some thought.
Occam’s razor indeed!

Biden hides in his basement doesn’t campaign… soon to be Secretary of State Anthony blink gets all the ex intelligence officials now employed by a wildly unfavorable press to call Hunter binds lap top story Russian disinformation. It wasn’t. election day trumps ahead… then in middle of the night truck loads of ballots show up in swing states… Biden suddenly has 81 plus million votes??? The most in US history! A wildly unfavorable to trump press goes jubilantly wild and any suggestion of voter fraud is COMPLETELY smacked down. Anyone suggesting such is instantly labeled a conspiracy theorist or a racist or a white nationalist/supremacist insert whatever pejorative you like.

1/6 happens cementing the narrative  

Biden takes office and immediately implements policy’s that take America in an almost 90degree left turn.  

Country goes to hell.  

Elon musk comes along buys Twitter and suddenly the darling of the left is openly called a fully formed piece of shit. Musk brings in lefty journalists to investigate the government Twitter connection and they expose massive information skewing and out right suppression. Confess calls the previously loved left wing journalists before congress and then THE IRS AUDITS THE JOURNALISTS????  

This is clearly an example of government institutions being weaponized against political rivals  

AND YOU LEFTIES WHO WOULD HAVE NORMALLY BEEN SCREAMING YOUR HEADS OFF are like…

But TRUMP,  

Yeah occam’s razor indeed

willywonka4u 22 Reviews 104 reads
posted
22 / 25

…The Twitter Files revealed that the FBI was ordering Twitter (and paying them too no less) to CENSOR American citizens who questioned the election.  

One has to ask, why on earth would the FBI give a shit about what some “right wing conspiracy theorists” say on Twitter? Why would they care?  

Could it be that the FBI participated in the rigging of the election and was worried about covering their own asses?

willywonka4u 22 Reviews 109 reads
posted
23 / 25

…when you mix fake ballots with real ones and make it impossible to tell which is which.

impposter 49 Reviews 98 reads
posted
24 / 25

Every allegation was investigated.
- Chinese ballots
- Jewish Space Lasers
- Italian Satellites (The DoJ contacted officials in Italy to ask about the Italian satellites!!)
- Internet hackers ... even though the voting and counting machines were not connected to the internet
- I got out an old ouija board and tried to ask Hugo Chavez if he knew anything about fake ballots and vote switching. Guess what he said!
- NO ONE HAS FOUND FAKE BALLOTS
- NO ONE HAS FOUND 50,000 DEAD PEOPLE VOTING (that Rudy alleged occurred in GA alone!)
- NO ONE HAS FOUND DOUBLE COUNTING OF ANY BALLOTS
- NO ONE HAS ANY EVIDENCE OF Venezuelan Programmers doing VOTE SWITCHING
- THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE OF Dem Candidate VOTE COUNTS BEING PRE-LOADED WITH 25,000 VOTES EVEN BEFORE THE POLLS WERE OPEN.
...
...
- What lunatic conspiracy theory do you want to have investigated next? Give the investigators and the courts some concrete evidence to continue to investigate.  
.
When people tell you to "Let it go!" they are referring to the wackadoodle conspiracy theories. They didn't mean that you should completely let go of reality.

Posted By: willywonka4u
Re: A recount means nothing…
…when you mix fake ballots with real ones and make it impossible to tell which is which.
Actually, depending on the state, they can check serial numbers, signatures, and other criteria to authenticate ballots.

willywonka4u 22 Reviews 109 reads
posted
25 / 25

On 155 million ballots? Did they do that? Of course they didn’t. Does the state have voter’s signatures on file? Did they hire handwriting experts to check them all? Or did they contact individual voters and ask them if that’s their signature? 155 million times? They didn’t check shit and you know it.

Register Now!