It's your Constitutional right to engage in peaceful protests and demonstrations unlike the riot which occurred at the Capitol on Jan 6. The minority of non-peaceful acts which occurred in Portland were mostly reactions to the presence of an armed military force on domestic soil facing off against civilians. Remove the force and the reaction dissipates.
They were also posting old images of protests from the "summer" of love crap too.
BUT..... reporters were also not showing any of the nightly "protests" and things going on prior 100+ days and the actual violence going on either.
The stuff going on in Portland was being mis-reported by all sides.
But what is sad is that now that Portland PD has been making more or a presence down there it seems it has 'cooled' a lot. funny how that happens.
Its not like there isnt any major protests going on right now....
It's your Constitutional right to engage in peaceful protests and demonstrations unlike the riot which occurred at the Capitol on Jan 6. The minority of non-peaceful acts which occurred in Portland were mostly reactions to the presence of an armed military force on domestic soil facing off against civilians. Remove the force and the reaction dissipates.
for 100 days... prior to national guard showing up.... really?
"It appears you are referencing the George Floyd protests in Portland in 2020 and conflating them with more recent events involving the National Guard in 2025."
.
"In July 2020, the Trump administration deployed federal law enforcement agents to Portland to protect federal property, such as the Hatfield Federal Courthouse. This was a highly controversial move that critics accused of escalating tensions, and it was separate from a National Guard deployment."
.
"A proposed National Guard deployment to Portland for immigration-related protests occurred in October 2025, but a federal court blocked the move. At that time, protests at the ICE facility were active but largely contained, and local officials asserted that violence levels did not justify military intervention."
.
"The idea of violence happening exactly 100 days before the National Guard's arrival is a misunderstanding of this timeline. Violence occurred repeatedly throughout the 100+ days of protests [of the murder of George Floyd] in 2020 and involved federal agents, not the National Guard."
.
The only cities to which the National Guard has been called are Los Angeles, Washington, D.C., Memphis, and Chicago. Deployments to Portland have been blocked by court order.
No the prior 100 days prior to any talks of the guard showing up.
Then lets not forget about CHAZ/CHAD where they took over a city block wouldn't let people in, burned or tried to burn down buildings.
But yeah.... peaceful bunch in portland.
Stop making excuses for what is going on in Portland and Chicago.
during the 2020 Democrat protests compared to the single day of protests on Jan. 6, which was only one protester killed and NO police.
The Democratic Party had nothing to do with them and the most violent protestors weren't affiliated with ANY political party.
And you know it.
Testimony of DC Police Officer Michael Fanone . . .
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cJGe4C3QqNQ&t=135s
is exaggerating in an attempt to keep his job. If this was as bad as this cop says, how did Trump ever get reelected by the voters? I'll answer that for you. It's because the J-6 committee, which destroyed all of the underlying evidence and records because it didn't support their phony conclusions lost the confidence of the public in the way they handled the hearings. The main people, like Liz Cheney, were given pardons by Biden. Who needs a pardon that is not guilty of something?
Really??? No, of course not. COEUR-DE-LION is pulling shit out of his ass once again. He's lying in an attempt to be a good little lying righty by continuing to suck Trump's dick. All he succeeds in doing is to keep proving what a fucking moron he is.
Michael Fanone RETIRED on December 31, 2021, ALMOST FOUR YEARS AGO, you fucking moron. He suffered burns, a heart attack, a concussion, and a traumatic brain injury when he was brutally assaulted by Trump Traitors on Jan. 6. And, naturally, Trump pardoned the traitors who brutally assaulted hero cop Michael Fanone.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Fanone#
question . . . . . If this guy is telling the truth, then how did Trump get reelected? Brutally attacked? Most accounts on unbiased sites say there were only minor injuries to a few police officers, mostly from the crush of the crowd, but not from anything intentionally directed at the officers. Others were shaking hands with the protesters. After this exaggerated story of his, even his wife would not take him back. He's 45 years old, living off his mother and whatever gubmint welfare he gets. How is that for some kind of hero?
Obviously you are not . . .
"At least nine people died in connection with the January 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol, including five who died in the immediate aftermath and at least four police officers who later died by suicide. A bipartisan Senate report confirmed at least seven deaths related to the incident." - Gemini AI
Says there were four deaths on Jan 6. Ashli Babbitt. shot by police, two others from natural causes, one heart attack and one stroke (according to the DC coroner), and one from amphetamine intoxication (according to the coroner). NO OFFICERS DIED AT THE SCENE. One died of suicide three days later, another one died of suicide a week after that. The next two suicides were six months later. One was not even there during the riot but was an overnight guard the night after the rioters left. Suicides are NOT considered a death in the line of duty by the police. Fact-check says that brings the total to 8, not 9. "Related to the incident" is a political statement, not a fact.
All of the police deaths in the Democrat riots of 2020 were ruled to be "in the line of duty." The civilian deaths were not at the hands of the police, but from attacks by the Democrat-sponsored Antifa rioters.
"Related to the incident" is not a political statement - if it is it's a bipartisan one - it's a conclusion after reviewing the facts. What police deaths were there? There were innocent civilian deaths at the hands of police in Las Vegas and Vallejo, CA. Since antifa is not an organized group, it is irresponsible and inaccurate to describe the violent rioters as antifa. They were certainly not "Democrat-sponsored". These individuals are violent criminals who should be prosecuted to the fullest of the law.
in the summer of 2020, or just didn't pay any attention to the news. That was the summer that Kamala Harris famously said that Antifa rioters should keep doing what they are doing. This was also the summer of Dems pushing "Defund the police." How did that turn out for the left? Are you saying you did not see any of the "Black Lives Matter" commercials on television? Are you just old and you don't have any memories of the summer of 2020, or do you have selective amnesia? Lol
How can it be a "conclusion after reviewing the facts" when all of the documents that were involved were destroyed by the Jan 6th committee after they concluded their hearings and published their bullshit report? If the report was accurate, why destroy the documents from which they claimed the reports were written? The bigger question is, "What kind of fraud did the Jan 6th committee commit that required them all to accept pardons from Biden when offered? Why did not a single member say, "no, thanks, I didn't do anything wrong" when offered an autopen pardon during Biden's final days in office?
This reply is so typical of you. You make wild accusations that you can't back up. When challenged you make even wilder accusations. You live in a MAGA fantasy world. I don't know why I even bother with you. You haven't posted anything truthful ever.
be able to answer a single question I posed. Instead, the speak in conclusive generalizations without any substance. Do you have blond hair?
Of course you couldn't answer any questions or challenges from me. You just make shit up and keep on doing so. I'm done you.
Questions have a question mark at the end. You made opinion statements, which you are entitled to do, but I didn't see any questions from you, only that you couldn't answer any of mine . . . . . again.
What I did was to refute the inaccurate and inflammatory statements made by you. Of course you ignored my rebuttal because you knew you statements were incorrect. That's typical of you. Actually there was on question I asked of you with an actual question mark, but you ignored that too. Ok I'll answer your last question. No.
any questions that I didn't answer, which is what I said. OTOH, I'm still waiting for YOUR answers to the ones I DID ask.
Is your lack of comprehension an acute or a chronic condition? Rhetorical question not that you'd answer anyway. You made a bold statement about police deaths during BLM social justice protests. I asked what deaths? I even used a question mark so you wouldn't be confused. You avoided my question, and you want me to answer yours even though I asked you first. How rude. Practice what you preach and answer my question, then I'll consider your queries.