Politics and Religion

Global Warming Advocate’s WORST Ally
RightwingUnderground 2989 reads
posted

When I saw him say these things on PBS two days ago, I wondered if it would get coverage. BUT, He is DEAD ON RIGHT about the underlying threat of population. Maybe that's why he's bought most of Montana (or is it Wyoming?). Sounds like he and Ben D. will be lonely neighbors some day.

*********************************************

Ted Turner: Global warming could lead to cannibalism

Billionaire environmentalist says world has too many people

By MIKE MORRIS
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Published on: 04/03/08

Failure to address global warming will have us all dead or eating each other by mid-century.

So says Ted Turner, the restaurateur, environmentalist and former media mogul whose controversial comments have earned him the nickname "Mouth of the South."

in 30 or 40 years and basically none of the crops will grow," Turner said during a wide-ranging, hour-long interview with PBS's Charlie Rose that aired Tuesday.

"Most of the people will have died and the rest of us will be cannibals," said Turner, 69. "Civilization will have broken down. The few people left will be living in a failed state — like Somalia or Sudan — and living conditions will be intolerable."

One way to combat global warming, Turner said, is to stabilize the population.

"We're too many people; that's why we have global warming," he said. "Too many people are using too much stuff."


-- Modified on 4/3/2008 3:58:42 PM

.............................
I wish that for just one time
You could stand inside my shoes
And just for that one moment
I could be you

Yes, I wish that for just one time
You could stand inside my shoes
You'd know what a drag it is
To see you
..........
Bob Dylan Positively 4th St.

These guys are insufferable....

-- Modified on 4/3/2008 4:07:10 PM

might belong to Leigh Taylor-Young... I could see that !   just remember - "Soylent Green is people"

i remember that well, LTY was a chair in that dramatic forecast. and the soylent looked like squares of Playdough tha toddlers might fashion while recreating.  And a jar of preserves was $135.



I'm worried -- it's still too damn hot, the AC is still kaput, and all the neighbors have been dieting.

harryj1836 reads

is the consummate piece of shit.

WillieTheBarTender2020 reads

Franklins, and I thought that would impress a Republican.

Oh, let me guess - he stole it from you, because - because he's not a TOTAL asshole!   It's you & Dick Cheney and the Bush clan against the world, eh?

Shut the fuck up, Harry.  Just shut up and slide under the table.

-- Modified on 4/4/2008 9:04:26 AM

harryj1238 reads

Useless Bastard, Ted Turner is just one more in a long parade of pseudo-liberal, rich, sheep herder pieces of shit, e.g., Soreass, Kerry, Clinton, Kennedy, PissOffie, Gore, etc. It is possible, Willie, that one day you and others of your ilk, will quit saying "bah" and realize that your sheep herders are taking you and the other sheep in the ass while they are claiming to serve you. The only thing these bastards are doing is servicing you and the other pathetic pseudo-liberal sheep. Ted Turner is a hog fully immersed in the hog trough and wants you to wipe his ass. Good going there Willie, you DumbSonofaBitch. Just say "bah" as you wipe.

GaGambler2251 reads

has finally pushed him over the edge. I always knew TT wasn't wrapped too tight, but it appears he has finally gone over the edge.

Sen_Craig2118 reads

Red-necked, right-winged, venom-spewing, grenade-totin', bullshit talkin', nutcase drunks like Harryj and the others here are just like me,  ...and we like boys!!   NOT girls!!

Now pass that bottle around, Willie, before I have to rush off to the bathroom again.

Went to a my niece's graduation at Drexel University in Philly  many years ago, (pre-Jane Fonda). Ted Turner was the commencement speaker. After he rambled on for what seemed like eternity, the graduates, parents, and guests looked at each other with quizzical expressions and asked, "What did he say"? First thing out of his mouth was, "All those here that do not have a high school diploma, raise your hands". His was the only hand that went up. After that, I knew we were in for whatever.

the tale of an overheated overpopulated earth... where there are no more forests, trees, or farms... and one tree is left in central park....

blah blah blah...

I actually do believe that a lot of our problems could be solved by reexamination of the population issue... but that will never fly...

for the libs.... hey, even Jane Fonda found him odd!  What does that say about him?

harryj1784 reads

I suspect the two useless bastards found each other odd. They made the perfect couple, a couple of pieces of pure shit. Hoorah for Hanoi Jane and Dickless Ted!!!

it was Grammercy Park.  wonder if it was still "private"?

hey, and remember the "people scoopers?"

i'm still awfully impressed with the gov't-maintained euthanasia facilities.  that's been a staple of many of those futuristic downers.

and that apple.... Jenny Agutter.... the temptress to sexual copulation! lol!

Bizzy, check her out in "Walkabout' [1971].  She's all of 16 years old in that flick,shows a lot of skin, and, well, I don't have to paint a picture for you.

The film is set in the year 2293, a post-apocalypse Earth. The Earth is now inhabited mostly by the "Brutals", ruled over by a warrior class called "Exterminators" or "the Chosen". The Exterminators worship a huge flying stone head called Zardoz as their god, who teaches them:

The gun is good. The penis is evil. The penis shoots seeds, and makes new life to poison the earth with a plague of men, as once it was. But the gun shoots death, and purifies the earth of the filth of brutals. Go forth... and kill!
..................................................

Just wondering if THIS is where DocG got his Zed inspiration???? lmao!


Sean Connery as Zed, wearing what the UK's Channel 4 described as "a red nappy, knee-high leather boots, pony tail and Zapata moustache.






-- Modified on 4/5/2008 8:54:16 PM

I saw that flick when i was 17.  I had smoked 4 joints prior to watching it and it made no sense at all to me.  Subqequent herb-less viewing continue to make no sense to me.  How did that damn Zardoz head fly?  


Hmmm...  "The gun good"?  News flash from the future?  The death cult jihadists won afterall, and their descendents look and sound like  a young Charlotte Rempling?

Chuck Darwin2183 reads

only a Republican could be THAT far beyond kinky.


Cannabalism.  What a horror!

But let's look more closely at TT's prophecy.  It's not clear if he's forecasting people relentlessly hunting down and killing others to eat, or if he's perhaps got a marginally less abhorrent idea of fear-ridden, hunger-crazed half-dead types eating the corpes of those already dead.  Which technically would make tham scavengers as much as cannibals.

So, what's the difference, moral and practical, if any, between:

1. hunting down people and eating them without killing them [our friend the wolf is an example of a predator who eats his prey while it's alive]?

2. hunting down people and killing them and then eating them?

3. eating only the corpses one finds while foraging and engaging in other  survival activities?

Admittedly, it's probably a set of distinctions without much difference.  Still, i think this topic is [forgive me] food  for thought.

As a practical matter. i think consuming the newly dead would be the first step down that very famous slippery slope.  and it would be steeply inclined as well as trecherous of footing.  The newly-dead obviously are in no position to object or to fight back [and they've gotten all the use out of their bodies that they're ever going to get], so it generally would be safer than hunting down a live victim. But you'd have to act fast, as there would no doubt be [a lot of?] competition for the corpses, and because of the heat, they're not going to keep all that long before turning. The battle here is definitely going to the strong, and the race to the swift.  No idea what the trade-offs would be between cosuming men versus women, the young versus the old, slender versus muscular versus fat, members of various ethnic/racial groups, etc...  For those survivors still able to keep a sense of humor in those horrific times, there would be new meaning, none of it especially welcome, in the expresson "hey, let's eat Chinese/Italian/French...tonight."  

Would religiously-inspired dietary restrictions fall by the wayside?  I imagine that keeping kosher, for example, would be quite a daunting task under TT's prediction.

TT's Hobbesian, Lord-of-the-Flies nightmare vision of a possible near future may be a bitter pill to swallow.  As always, i fear it's the most ruthless and the physically strongest who would survive.  Which then brings us  to considerations of evolutionary fitness and natural selection...

-- Modified on 4/4/2008 5:29:15 PM

Register Now!