Politics and Religion

The Jan 6th Pipe Bomber. What do you guys think about it?
willywonka4u 22 Reviews 139 reads
posted

Isn't it odd that we could track down people from all over the country just for being around the Capitol on 1/6, some of whom did nothing but record video of the event, but we still haven't tracked down the pipe bomber? Why do you think that is?

I searched and searched and the Daily Wire is the only place I found it.  

From the link...

"A former FBI agent said that the Bureau quickly believed that it tied the person who planted pipe bombs at the Democrat National Committee and the Republican National Committee to a particular Metro fare card and license plate, but did not allow him to interview the person of interest and pulled his team off of the lead.

The allegation raises more questions about the pipe bombs, which were by far the most violent aspect of the January 6 protests, but which Democrats and authorities have seldom mentioned since.

Kyle Seraphin, who led FBI surveillance teams, told The Daily Wire that shortly after January 6, a counterintelligence team met him at a firehouse in Falls Church, Virginia to brief him on his next surveillance target: They had used security footage to follow the person into a Metro station after he planted the bombs, and identified the fare card that was used.

That fare card then allowed them to determine that the person got off at a Metro stop in Northern Virginia, where surveillance footage showed the person entering a car. Both the car and the fare card were in the name of the same person — a retired Air Force chief master sergeant who was now working as a contractor with a security clearance, they said.

Seraphin and his team were assigned to stake out the person’s row house for days, but the FBI blocked his request to interview the person, he said. Then they were called off the target completely and told to pore through low-priority leads about minor January 6 participants, he said.

Allegedly someone threw bombs around the Capitol which could have killed congressmen or a busload of nuns or anything, and the answer is you can’t follow this guy around — you have to go to headquarters and read ‘leads’ where someone said ‘I might’ve went to high school with some guy that was standing around the Capitol?’” Seraphin told The Daily Wire.

Seraphin said the bomber wasn’t necessarily the same person of interest to whom the car and card were registered to, but that it was a highly specific lead that, if pursued, had a good chance of leading investigators to the suspect. “They found people based on their earlobes that were hanging out by a flagpole,” he said of the Bureau’s persistence in pursuing more minor January 6 wrongdoings.

He said the case was being run by the counter-intelligence division, which are not “manhunters” used to apprehend people and build prosecutable cases. He said that team called in his surveillance team, only to go ahead and quickly cut it off."

WHY in gods name would you N O T follow up on this?  Oh, wait, I know one of your actual working agents did his job tooooo well and got close to something you did NOT want out there...

To me, it sounds like 1/6 was an inside job. That if they couldn't get something to materialize at the Capitol, then pipebombs were their backup. Wasn't Nancy Pelosi's computer stolen that day too by masked men who broke into the Capitol through a side window while everyone else was distracted by the protesters? FBI looking for blackmail to avoid Congressional oversight?

RespectfulRobert10 reads

It was started by the then president of the United States with his nutty, thoroughly delusional "Stop The Steal" rally with many of his police assaulting thugs in attendance, or what you would Righties would call "sightseers." Later, the ultimate insider would pardon and commute the sentences of those very same violent criminals, bc as we all know, he loves cops and is very much against crime. smh

26 FBI informants were there.

Post riot, the FBI lied to Congress:

Confusion and Lack of Coordination Contributed to the FBI’s Inaccurate Report to Congress that It Had Canvassed Field Offices. After January 6, the FBI reported to Congress that it had directed its field offices prior to January 6 to canvass their CHSs for information concerning threats in connection with the January 6 Electoral Certification. However, as noted, we found that no canvassing of field offices for source information had occurred. We found that the FBI’s statements to Congress were not intentionally inaccurate, and that confusion and lack of coordinated communications contributed to the inaccurate reporting.
Many of the informants broke the law during the riot:
Twenty-six FBI CHSs were in Washington, D.C. on January 6 in connection with the events of January 6.
The OIG determined that three of those CHSs had been tasked by FBI field offices to report on specific domestic terrorism case subjects who were possibly attending the events of January 6. One of these three CHSs entered the Capitol during the riot. The other two entered the restricted area around the Capitol.
Twenty-three additional FBI CHSs were in Washington, D.C., and attended January 6 events

A lie is an INTENTIONAL mis-statement. And ChicKie's own excerpt says, "the FBI’s statements to Congress were not intentionally inaccurate." In other words, the FBI was NOT lying.
Tsk, tsk, tsk.

Dem controlled Congress: Did you canvass your field offices re CHS knowledge of pre-J6 info?
FBI: Yes, we did.
Narrator: They didn’t.
DOJ OIG: They didn’t, but it was just a miscommunication.
Dem Controlled Congress: Oh, OK!

-- Modified on 5/16/2025 12:19:26 PM

Your fake narrative above is NOT what your own original link said.
"We found that the FBI’s statements to Congress were not intentionally inaccurate, and that confusion and lack of coordinated communications contributed to the inaccurate reporting."
This is NOT saying the FBI lied.

It’s my opinion that your DOJ quote is a lie. It’s your opinion that it’s not.

We found that the FBI’s statements to Congress were not intentionally inaccurate, and that confusion and lack of coordinated communications contributed to the inaccurate reporting
Comme ci, comme ça

They are based on "facts" but you wouldnt know a fact if it bit you in the ass!

The quote he provided is quite clear and his interpretation of it is a lie.
That's not an "opinion." It's an observation grounded in facts. In his own facts, no less.

I tried to give him the benefit of the doubt for at one time, I thought he was a more rationale Republican. But yes, a weasel is the correct term. Him WKing for Willys racism is just so pathetic as well.

but ChicKie has even WKed for The SPOAT, our worst and stupidest poster of all time.
You can't go lower than that on the Partisan Hack Scale.

Register Now!