YOU ARE FUCKING OBTUSE.
There will always be racism. Sad but true. there will always be some fuck stick that will discriminate. When people bring RACE up in every fucking issue it keeps racism even more alive. LET THAT SINK IN. The more you bring it up the more it stays alive. Think about younger generations... kids now are not growing up with parents that grew up in the 60's. They are growing up with parents that are tolerant and what not. They have to find out about racism on TV or racist hate on TV. They are taught on TV to hate a black person because color of skin type shit. it isn't parents (unless they are skin heads) So when your RACE WARRIORS keep saying our country is so racist.... when it isn't. Kids think this or develop ideas that maybe I should be. HELL.... look at the whole "Black Fatigue" bull shit now. Think about it. White people have been called racist long enough for no reason....let that sink in. You say ICE is racially profiling.... HOW? Going after "brown" people? That is the media saying that. You do know they are working off TIPS. They just dont walk down the street and say... Hey there is a brown person lets check them out. Any story that says that is pure bull shit. SORRY BUT IS TRUE. All of those are debunked. They either are proven to be that the person had a warrant, was with someone who had a warrant, was in a place that was raided outside of that place (caught in friendly fire type thing), pulled over because of something illegal (speeding, expired plates, etc.) I work with lots of Hispanics and many customers are Hispanic. Most are here legally. I say most because you can never be 100%. Also because it is ILLEGAL to ask nationality on job applications or any application (CIVIL RIGHT LAW in many states). But they are not scared of ICE. They said the ones getting targeted deserve it because they are breaking "big laws".....ie: drug crimes, violent crimes, etc. OR have in the past. That is what they are telling me. But again the ones I know tell me they have green cards, work visa's, became citizens, etc. Anyways.... side track. But I am seeing in my area that isn't TRUE. Plus what I see on the news story after story debunked with the "targeting". One out of 1000 might be true. But again like I stated before.... you will never cure racism.... sad but true.…prosecuted the cops that killed her. One cop, Brett Hankison, wildly fired 10 shots from outside the house through the window but did not fire the shot that killed Breonna Taylor.
Hankison was convicted in November, 2024 by Biden’s DOJ of violating Taylor’s civil rights. However, the sentencing was done today under Trump’s DOJ.
The sentencing guidelines call for a sentence of 33 to 41 months. Trump’s DOJ asked for a sentence of one day. ONE DAY!!!!!!!
The DOJ’s sentencing memo for Hankison downplayed his role ing the raid at Taylor’s home, saying “he did not shoot Ms. Taylor and his otherwise not responsible for her death.”
Incredible! Trump’s DOJ sounds like they’re DEFENDING the cop, not prosecuting him. The judge ignored the DOJ and sentenced Hankison to 33 months.
Don’t worry, though, Trump will pardon the cop as soon as he’s sentenced. Trump loves cops…except the ones that tried to stop him from committing treason.
So my take on this whole exchange. (i never looked into this whole thing and want to be brought up to speed)
Only thing that is being refuted is that Taylor wasn't a "known drug mule".... correct?
The rest of what is being said is true???
The police had a warrant for a drug dealer, police announced prior to entering, drug dealer open fired, police returned fire, people died during the exchange?
Are those the facts?
Then now sentencing under one DOJ was 31 to 44 months and another (NEW DOJ) wants 1 day?
Are those the facts?
Now Even if these facts are 100% true or even if some are true and some are not.
Here is my take on what happened for about 2-3 years. Our justice system was out of whack. After the Floyd/BLM riots. Many courts, political leaders, etc. all went too overboard on things. I am not saying people didn't do wrong. But they went overboard to "appease" a demographic in fear of more riots and chaos (I'm not being racist I am talking about the protesters who were going nuts). Just like they did with the whole "hands up don't shoot" fucking fiasco and lie. Remember that with Mr. Brown. How he as just a little innocent boy. Yet when all the facts played out. That was far from the truth. Again.... I am not saying that these police might have not done everything by the books or could have done things differently. But should the punishment be the full 31-44 months.... or should it be less? Should it be the 1 day or should it be something in between?
Because if the facts that were presented are in fact TRUE (which none of you have refuted yet).... it looks like the 31-44 months is harsh for police doing their job. Now an officer firing blindly into a home, thru a wall, not knowing your target, could hit other police officers, etc..... not protocol.
Now don't go off on saying... WELL IT IS YOUR JOB TO PROVE.... no it is yours in a debate to prove him wrong as well.
chose not to look into the rest. Because, having debunked one important part of Wanker's claim, I chose not to do the rest of his homework for him. It is up to Wanker (or anyone else who choses to do it) to take on the rest of his claims.
Perhaps you might like to. Or maybe Wanker will get up off of his lazy ass and do it. But please don't tell me what's my responsibility to prove or disprove. I don't play that.
I dont feel like to.
But my statement remains the same about how our justice system OVER CORRECTED big time during those years.
"Lady Justice" wasn't blind. The system tilted against police to appease a base. Again not saying police are completely innocent in all of this. Like I stated someone shooting blindly from outside of a building isn't protocol... if that is what happened. But other instances judges knew what could/would happen in communities IF a verdict went a certain way so they tilted the trial. They suppressed evidence or didn't allow certain things to be presented to juries. They didn't let certain testimony happen. They didn't let certain evidence happen. etc.
I am from Minnesota. The stuff that happened during the Chauvin Trial would piss many off. Again... he isn't 100% innocent in all of this. But he was thrown to the wolves. A "star" witness was caught lying. But testimony allowed. The judge after the trial even admitted to doing what i stated about suppression of evidence... but they are not allowing a retrial as of yet. The other officers go throw to the wolves as well. Again the sentencing didn't match what really happened. Like I stated they did this to appease the mass so things did "relight" the riots/destruction type shit.
Unfortunately it looks like your attempt to purchase VIP membership has failed due to your card being declined. Good news is that we have several other payment options that you could try.
We thank you for your purchase!
Membership should be activated shortly. You'll receive notification!
