Hook line and sinker!!!!
Dem's fall for it again. Epstiens brother talks about it.
This shows you how the Dem's "leak" shit to push a narrative. Funny how this has been a repeat thing over and over and over. Then when the truth comes out it is really nothing.
This may be just a hint of what can be expected if the House votes to force the Justice Dept. to release its Epstein files.
Now cue up righty whines....
Trump thinks he can shoot someone on 5th Avenue and not lose a single voter. I wonder if he loses any voters IF he's a suspected pedophile. MAGA lemmings please tell us if he'd lose your support.
They are being analyzed now, so we'll see if there are any other bombshells.
Also on Nancy Mace, says the Times:
"President Trump and his administration on Wednesday ramped up a pressure campaign on congressional Republicans who are pushing for a full release of the Justice Department’s files about the convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, rushing to head off a House vote on the matter.
Top officials met in the White House Situation Room on Wednesday with Representative Lauren Boebert, a Colorado Republican who is backing an effort to force a House vote on whether to demand the release of the files.
She was summoned to sit down with top Justice Department and F.B.I. officials, according to two people familiar with the matter. One of the people said the session included Attorney General Pam Bondi and F.B.I. Director Kash Patel. Both people spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to comment on the private discussions."
Trump is CLEARLY afraid of something....
...the petition, Boebert's vote was locked in and couldn't be withdrawn.
While Grijalva was signing the petition, Boeber taunted Trump on X:
"I want to thank the White House officials for meeting with me today.
Together, we remain committed to ensuring transparency for the American people."
The squeeze was stupid and futile anyway. There'll be more than 4 Republicans who vote to release the files next week. There could be as many as 50. But Republicans are gutless cowards - if 100 or more vote to release the files, Trump couldn't possibly primary all of them. "In unity there is strength."
And it's crickets from this board's MAGA faithful. Even your "sweet Karoline" (apologies to Neil Diamond) who had the unmitigated gall to gaslight America and say these emails proved that "trump did nothing wrong" has more temerity than all of you.
If he's a proven pedo, he loses a massive amount of voters and will be driven from office. I'm not sure what the lemmings say though, I don't know any of those. Yes, he did say he could shoot someone but he really doesn't think that and you know it but it's fun to post for you, isn't it?
FWIW, Sarah Palin never said she "could see Russia from her house" either (for the sheep that believe everything the media feeds you and there's a handful in here)
Lead-in . . .
-
Jeffrey Epstein described himself as Donald Trump’s “closest friend” and claimed intimate knowledge of his proclivity for sex, including cuckolding his best friends, according to recordings obtained exclusively by the Daily Beast.
-
The convicted pedophile even boasted of his closeness to Trump and his now-wife Melania by claiming, “the first time he slept with her was on my plane,” which was dubbed the Lolita Express.
-
Epstein spoke at length about Trump with the author Michael Wolff in August 2017, two years before being found dead in his jail cell. Wolff was researching his bombshell bestseller "Fire and Fury" at the time.
-
The recordings cast more light on Trump’s long relationship with Epstein, and will add to debate over the character of the Republican candidate, especially his attitudes and conduct toward women, just days before the election.
-
The tapes tell Epstein’s version of the relationship between two former friends and their very different paths: One toward infamy, prison and suicide; the other toward power, the Oval Office and his own criminal conviction for paying hush money to a porn star.
-
Trump’s camp referred to the tapes’ release as “false smears” and “election interference.”
-
The tapes also offer unusual insight into the friendship of two wealthy, powerful men who frequently went out on the town together, prowling for women in New York and Atlantic City.
-
http://docs.house.gov/meetings/JU/JU08/20250227/117951/HHRG-119-JU08-20250227-SD006-U6.pdf
Key Points:
-
* Notorious sex offender Jeffrey Epstein said of President Donald Trump, “I know how dirty Donald is,” in a 2018 email thread released by House Democrats about Trump’s former personal lawyer and fixer Michael Cohen pleading guilty to campaign finance violations and agreeing to cooperate in a federal investigation of the president.
-
* The email thread, which CNBC has not independently verified, is among more than 20,000 documents obtained from Epstein’s estate through a subpoena by Democrats on the House oversight committee, which released them.
-
* In a 2019 email, Epstein told author Michael Wolff that his ex-friend Trump “knew about the girls.”
-
* Epstein, in a 2011 email to his now-convicted procurer Ghislaine Maxwell, wrote, “I want you to realize that the dog that hasn’t barked is Trump.” Epstein added that a person whose name was redacted in the email, but whom the Democrats identified as a victim of his “spent hours at my house with” Trump.
-
http://www.cnbc.com/2025/11/12/trump-jeffrey-epstein-ghislaine-maxwell-emails-house-democrats.html
So that makes all Trump's lies about not knowing, OK.
But, oops, he also wrote Trump knew about the girls.
Shit, meet fan.
Rep Tim Burchett put on the floor a vote to release info and Dem's blocked it.
YET..... House Speaker is saying Next week there will be a vote to release the info.
Why did they block this first vote? What will happen the next vote?
Things need to be released. But I am always skeptical when they release small bits here and there.... Especially after the fuck up of the shutdown. Two of these emails they are saying reference the lady who said Trump did nothing. The other one is interesting and needs more investigation, information, and context.
Time will tell about next week and if the vote goes thru and then what comes of it.
And yet it's been reported that it was actually Republican Womack of Arkansas who shot the UC down as an improper inquiry.
Actually they are saying it was "shot down" because they wanted the votes to be "public". His bill/vote would allow it not to be recorded or "public" how people voted.
IF justice is the real reason for the release of the files this shouldn't have fucking mattered. This shows you that it is pure political theatre. I dont care what side you are on the political isle. Both sides are using this for bullshit reasons and not to get to the bottom of anything. They just want to gain political points with voters. This proved it. Let that sink in.... Dem's wanted to make sure that VOTERS know how people voted on this measure. They have the votes needed since they will swear in the new member. But yet they want to make sure the votes are "recorded".....why? Political theatre is why. If Republicans did this I would call out the same bullshit. It isn't about justice it is political games is all.
Both parties have been doing this with Epstein. Trump "reversing" his tone on it is all political bullshit. The idiots saying "he played 4D chess" and set the trap are idiots and don't see how it was political bullshit as well.
..."See, Jeffrey Epstein also called him the world's worse person" he's "dangerous", lol. It proves what we're saying...says the donkey, LMAO
You really look ridiculous.
Say what? How exactly are Dems aligning themselves with Epstein? Seems like it's trump that is tied to hip with pedophile and sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein.
In an email, Epstein said: “I have met some very bad people. None as bad as Trump. Not one decent cell in his body.” Now, coming from a pedophile, that's got to be pretty damning.
Let's just suppose, for argument's sake, Trump never had sexual relations with underage girls. Does it absolve him of any guilt? Maybe legally, but certainly not morally. The Trump birthday card and the Epstein emails clearly show Trump knew what was going on with Epstein. Trump condoned, if not encouraged, Epstein's pedophilia, instead of reporting it to the authorities. If you couldn't tolerate Bill Clinton being a womanizer, how could you possibly turn your head the other way and accept a morally devoid Donald Trump in the WH?
Mainly, she says it would have been even worse if Epstein was into sex with 5- or 8-year-olds. She doesn't give Epstein a pass but the distinction she makes is damn weird. Why did she do this? It's not clear.
She's softening the ground if it comes out that trump had sex with a 16 year old. Allows MAGA to say that she looked legal and lied about her age and at least she wasn't a 6 year old.
and she was speculating along the same lines. If this proves true I can't wait for the MAGAts here to start parroting, "so Trump fucked a 16-year-old. So what? He wasn't a real pedophile fucking 8-year-olds."
Too bad the law makes no such distinction.
Retroactive from say year, 1990. There problems solved.
Now righties can breathe a sight of relief. They’re off the hook.
On “Bubba”, commonly assumed it was Bill Clinton???
Oh Lordy someone pass me the popcorn 🤣🤣
-- Modified on 11/15/2025 1:49:51 PM
Hook line and sinker!!!!
Dem's fall for it again. Epstiens brother talks about it.
This shows you how the Dem's "leak" shit to push a narrative. Funny how this has been a repeat thing over and over and over. Then when the truth comes out it is really nothing.
A good written article showing how many people used Epstein or wanted to be around him.
Shows kind of how he was working or trying to make connections.
I would say it was Epstein who was the user of the people around him. I'm constantly amazed by the extensive network of influential connections he developed around him. He really knew how to use money and influence.
I would say it is both ways. In the article I posted people reached out to Jefferey for info on women they were seeing (mistresses) and what not. They were also looking for advise on financial stuff or into things about making money. People also reached out to him for "dirt" on others. Now for the reason of the "dirt".... for political, financial, industrial, social, etc. type of gain who knows. Was Epstein like the local hairdresser who knows all the gossip on everyone. You know might not be 100% the truth but enough that people will or should be nervous about things.
Hopefully soon we will see the "files" or what they will let us see about them. I am sure they will be 50% redacted and will not have anything "new" in them. It will just be a fucking kangaroo court like it is now and be all public opinion which will lead to possibly lawsuits because of "slander" type situation without actual facts. Just like the whole "bubba" and how people immediately jumped on it and said it was Clinton and how it must be TRUE. When it was actually nothing and Jeff's brother confirmed it.
New details of Summers’ relationship with Epstein emerged last week when a House committee released emails showing years of personal correspondence between the two men, including Summers making sexist comments and seeking Epstein’s romantic advice.
.
Warren, a former Harvard Law School professor and now the Democratic senior senator from Massachusetts, said in response to a CNN inquiry that she believes Summers “cannot be trusted” with students given his past relationship with Epstein.
.
http://www.cnn.com/2025/11/17/politics/elizabeth-warren-larry-summers-harvard-epstein
Here is the slippery slope..... if they fire him. Does he have grounds to sue?
See what I mean how slander could come into play? Have no clue what exactly he did or didn't do or know. But yet she is saying this?
It is like demonizing someone who "might" have know a neighbor, co-worker, etc. Might have done something. But they didn't have direct proof. See the issues that can happen.
BTW.... did anyone see what was slipped into the bill by Senators? They can SUE if they get subpoenaed.
why doesn't he just tell his Justice Department to release them? He can do that.
He let the shut down go on and on to delay this.
He dragged Rep. Boebert into the Situation Room to shut it down.
But now he wants it out?
All he has to do is snap his fingers.